Advertisement

Workplace Learning for School-Based Apprenticeships: Tripartite Conversations as a Boundary-Crossing Tool

  • Ingela AnderssonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (TVET, volume 29)

Abstract

This chapter examines how a vocational education and training activity, the tripartite conversation, is shaped in the context of the Swedish upper secondary apprenticeship education. Learning in school and in a workplace is often emphasised as complementary. Research that draws on activity theory emphasises the development of shared spaces to support integration of learning across these sites. In this chapter the tripartite conversation is investigated as a tool intended to support integration of experiences across school and workplace. The focus of this study was the following question: What does the tripartite conversation indicate about what the parties try to achieve with regard to students’ learning? Field studies were conducted in three upper secondary schools in 2014. Sixteen tripartite conversations between vocational teacher, workplace tutor and student have been analysed. Activity theory and the concepts of tensions and contradictions have formed the analytical framework. The tripartite conversation is identified as a boundary-crossing tool to plan and negotiate workplace learning paths. The findings show that students were expected to develop knowledge, skills and abilities to handle daily work assignments and complex work situations in the workplace. These goals were sometimes hard to achieve due to uncertainties among participants about the learning objectives, norms and rules that guided the students’ learning in the work place. It is concluded that integration of experiences across sites can be supported when workplace learning is collaboratively planned and evaluated from the perspectives of school and workplace respectively.

Keywords

Upper Secondary Apprenticeships Tripartite conversation Boundary-crossing tool Activity theory 

References

  1. Aarkrog, V. (2005). Learning in the workplace and the significance of school-based education: A study of learning in a Danish vocational education and training programme. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 24(2), 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akkerman, F. S., & Bakker, A. (2012). Crossing boundaries between school and work during apprenticeships. Vocations and Learning, 5(2), 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berglund, I. (2007). En ny yrkesutbildning – genom yrkesbaserat lärande? En studie i tre gymnasieskolor som samverkar med företag. Report from the EQUAL-project. Teacher College Stockholm. http://yrkesutbildning.blogg.lu.se/files/2015/01/ENYrapporten.pdf. Accessed 24 Mar 2017.
  4. Berglund, I. (2012). Att vara lärling i gymnasial lärlingsutbildning. In I. Henning Loeb, & H. Korp (Eds.), Lärare och lärande i yrkesprogram och introduktionsprogram (pp. 167–182). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  5. Berglund, I., & Lindberg, V. (2012). Assessment of vocational knowing: Experiences from the Swedish pilot project with upper secondary apprenticeship 2008–2011. Bulletin of Institute of Technology and Vocational Education. http://ir.nul.nagoya-u.ac.jp/jspui/bitstream/2237/17026/1/3%E3%80%90Viveca%20Lindberg%E3%80%91.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2016.
  6. Berner, B. (2010). Crossing boundaries and maintaining differences between school and industry: Forms of boundary-work in Swedish vocational education. Journal of Education and Work, 23(1), 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Billett, S. (2006). Constituting the workplace curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(1), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Billett, S. (2009). Vocational learning: Contributions of workplaces and educational institutions. In R. Maclean & D. Wilson (Eds.), International handbook of education for the changing world of work (pp. 1711–1724). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: an activity theoretical approach to developmental research. University of California, San Diego, The Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition’s website: http://lchc.ucsd.edu/mca/Paper/Engestrom/expanding/toc.htm. Accessed 9 Jan 2015.
  10. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts. A methodological framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 368–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2003). Learning as apprentices in the contemporary UK workplace: Creating and managing expansive and restrictive participation. Journal of Education and Work, 16(4), 407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gustavsson, S. (2012). Trepartsamtalet i APL. (The tripartite conversation and workplace learning in an upper secondary vocational education and training programme). In I. Henning Loeb & H. Korp (Eds.), Lärare och lärande i yrkesprogram och introduktionsprogram (pp. 149–165). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  16. Hegender, H. (2010). Vilkor och praxis. Bedömning av lärarstudenters yrkeskunskaper under verksamhetsförlagd utbildning. Nordic Studies in Education, 30(3), 180–197.Google Scholar
  17. Kilbrink, N., & Bjurulf, V. (2013). Transfer of knowledge in technical vocational education: A narrative study in Swedish upper secondary school. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Konkola, R., Tuomi-Gröhn, T., Lambert, P., & Ludvigsen, S. (2007). Promoting learning and transfer between school and workplace. Journal of Education and Work, 20(3), 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kristmansson, P. (2016). Gymnasial lärlingsutbildning på Handels- och administrationsprogrammet. En studie av lärlingsutbildningens förutsättningar och utvecklingen av yrkeskunnande. University of Umeå: UmU tryckservice. http://umu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1040061/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2016.
  20. Lagström, A. (2012). Lärlingsläraren – en studie om hur vård- och yrkeslärares uppdrag formas i samband med införandet av gymnasial lärlingsutbildning. University of Gothenburg. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/27999. Accessed 12 Jan 2015.
  21. Lgy 70. (1970). Läroplan för gymnasieskolan (Curricula for Upper Secondary School). Stockholm: Liber AB.Google Scholar
  22. Lindberg, V. (2003). Yrkesutbildning i omvandling. En studie av lärandepraktiker och kunskapstransformationer. Lärarhögskolan. Institutionen för samhälle, kultur och lärande. Stockholms Universitet: HLS Förlag. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:225794/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 1 Nov 2016.
  23. Lindberg, V. (2013). Bedömning av lärares yrkeskunnande. In Y. Stråhle, & A. Bronäs (Eds.), Mentorskap i skola och förskola (pp. 148–174). Stockholm: Nordstedts.Google Scholar
  24. Lpf. 94. (1994). Läroplanen för de frivilliga skolformerna. (Curricula for the Voluntary School Forms) Stockholm: Liber AB.Google Scholar
  25. Olofsson, J. (2014). Yrkesutbildning i förändring – utmaningar och möjligheter ur ett forsknings och aktörsperspektiv. Ratio report no. 10. http://ratio.se/app/uploads/2014/10/yrkesutbildning-i-forandring.pdf. Accessed 7 Jan 2015.
  26. Sappa, V., & Aprea, C. (2014). Conceptions of connectivity: How Swiss teachers, trainers and apprentices perceive vocational learning and teaching across different learning sites. Vocations and Learning, 7(3), 263–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schaap, H., Baartmaan, L., & de Bruijn, E. (2012). Students’ learning processes during school-based learning and workplace learning in vocational education: A review. Vocations and Learning, 5(2), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. The School Inspectorate. (2011). Arbetsplatsförlagd utbildning i praktiken. En kvalitetsgranskning av gymnasieskolans yrkesförberedande utbildningar. Report 2011:2. https://www.skolinspektionen.se/globalassets/publikationssok/granskningsrapporter/kvalitetsgranskningar/2011/yrkesforberedande-utbildningar/kvalgr-yrkesforb-slutrapport.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.
  29. Tuomi-Gröhn, T. (2003). Developmental transfer as a goal of internship in practical nursing. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn, Y. Engeström, & M. Young (Eds.), Between school and work. New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 199–231). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  30. Tuomi-Gröhn, T., Engeström, Y., & Young, M. (2003). From transfer to boundary-crossing between school and work as a tool for developing vocational education: An introduction. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn, Y. Engeström, & M. Young (Eds.), Between school and work. New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing (pp. 1–15). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  31. Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational Research Review, 3(2), 130–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Virtanen, A., Tynjälä, P., & Eteläpelto, A. (2014). Factors promoting vocational students’ learning at work: Study on student experiences. Journal of Education and Work, 27(1), 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wesselink, R., de Jong, C., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2010). Aspects of competence based education as footholds to improve the connectivity between learning in school and in the workplace. Vocations and Learning, 3(1), 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education and Special EducationUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations