Skip to main content

Integration Between School and Work: Developments, Conceptions and Applications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integration of Vocational Education and Training Experiences

Abstract

Integration of students’ experiences in and between education institutions (as in schools, vocational colleges and universities) and workplaces, to develop vocational competence, is a central tenet of contemporary educational systems and provisions. Educational institutions and workplaces are no longer seen in isolation for pre-employment preparations as well as continuing development of the workforce. However, researchers (e.g. Onstenk J, Blokhuis F, Education + Training, 49(6):489–499, 2007; Billett S, Integrating practice-based experiences into higher education. Springer, Dordrecht, 2015) argue that the concept of ‘integration’ remains underdeveloped, both theoretically and conceptually. In this chapter we summarise some of the more general developments and complexities around integration of students’ learning experiences in schools and work sites. We discuss the historical intentions and progression of pedagogical means into curriculum design and delivery of vocational education to better prepare individuals as skilful and productive workers. The account here outlines conceptualisations and development of processes of integration as vocational education systems transformed in their manifestations, purposes and practices. Examples of different types of integration and typologies and their theoretical bases are summarised. We then outline examples of common applications, i.e. pedagogies and arrangements suited for integration. Three main units of analysis (individual, context and cultural and historical) are also introduced. While integration often has been an issue for two parties, school and workplace, students’ agency is also considered and given a foregrounded position here. An identified challenge in researching integration is to recognise agency intertwined with structure. The concluding section contends that the main aim of integration is to jointly interpret knowledge and knowing in the social cultural contexts of different settings and achieve a ‘common sense of mutuality’ (Edwards A, Revealing relational work. In Edwards (ed) Working relationally in and across practices. A cultural-historical approach to collaboration. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2017, p. 2). We recommend more research to further illuminate this complex phenomenon of integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The terms and their meaning may vary between occupational sectors and nations – still the kind of phenomenon they are related to are common in many countries.

References

  • Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Crossing boundaries between school and work during apprenticeships. Vocations and Learning, 5, 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-011-9073-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baartman, L. K. J., & de Bruijn, E. (2011). Integrating knowledge, skills and attitudes: Conceptualising learning processes towards vocational competence. Educational Research Review, 6, 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartkus, K., & Higgs, J. (2011). Research in cooperative and work-integrated education. In R. K. Coll & K. E. Zegwaard (Eds.), International handbook for cooperative & work-integrated education (2nd ed., pp. 73–84). Boston: World Association for Cooperative Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benavot, A. (1983). The rise and decline of vocational education. Sociology of Education, 56(2), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2001a). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2001b). Knowing in practice: Re-conceptualising vocational expertise. Learning and Instruction, 11, 431–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2002). Workplace pedagogical practices: Co-participation and learning. British Journal of Educational Studies, 50(4), 457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2004). Learning through work. Workplace participatory practices. In H. I. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munroe (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 109–125). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2006). Constituting the workplace curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(1), 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2009). Realising the educational worth of integrating work experiences in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(7), 827–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2015). Integrating practice-based experiences into higher education. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S., & Choy, S. (2014). Integrating professional learning experiences across university and practice settings. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning (pp. 485–512). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S., Henderson, A., Choy, S., Dymock, D., Beven, F., Kelly, A., James, I., Lewis, J., & Smith, R. (2013). Refining models and approaches in continuing education and training. Adelaide: National Centre for Vocational Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2003). Expertise development: The transition between school and work. Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (2012). Problematising practice-based education. In Higgs, Barnett, Billett, Hutchings, & Franziska (Eds.), Practice-based education. Perspectives and strategies (pp. 55–68). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cedefop. (2009). The shift to learning outcomes: Policies and practices in Europe (Cedefop reference series; 72). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, P., Munby, H., & Hutchinson, N. (2000). Workplace learning from a curriculum perspective. In C. Symes (Ed.), Working knowledge: Conference proceedings. Sydney: The University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coll, R. K., & Taylor, N. (2008). Science education in context: an overview and some observations. In R. K. Coll & N. Taylor (Eds.), Science education in context: An international examination of the influence of context on science curricula development and implementation (pp. ix–xiv). Rotterdam: Sense Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coll, R. K., & Zegwaard, K. E. (2001). The integration of knowledge in cooperative and work-integrated education programs. In R. K. Coll & K. E. Zegwaard (Eds.), International handbook for cooperative & work-integrated education (2nd ed., pp. 297–304). Boston: World Association for Cooperative Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collin, K. (2006). Connecting work and learning: Design engineers’ learning at work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(7/8), 403–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L., Orrell, J., & Bowden, M. (2010). Work integrated learning. A guide to effective practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cort, P. (2010). Stating the obvious: The European qualifications framework is not a neutral evidence-based policy tool. European Educational Research Journal, 9(3), 304–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J., & Dewey, E. (1915/2015). Schools of to-morrow. Retrieved March 2017 http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/48906#

  • Edwards, A. (2017). Revealing relational work. In Edwards (Ed.), Working relationally in and across practices. A cultural-historical approach to collaboration (pp. 1–21). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ellström, P. (2001). Integrating learning and work: Problems and prospects. Human Resource Development Quarterly, Winter, 12(4), 421–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y., & Miettinen, R. (1999). Introduction. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (2004). Transfer of learning between education and workplace settings. In A. F. Rainbird & H. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 201–221). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K., & Guile, D. (2012). Putting different forms of knowledge to work in practice. In Higgs, Barnett, Billett, Hutchings, & Franziska (Eds.), Practice-based education. Perspectives and strategies (pp. 113–130). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2004). Expansive learning at work: Integrating organisational and personal development. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 126–144). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford: Further Education Unit, Oxford Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenewald, T., Drysdale, M., Chiupka, C., & Johnston, N. (2011). Towards a definition and models of practice for cooperative and work-integrated education. In R. K. Coll & K. E. Zegwaard (Eds.), International handbook for cooperative & work-integrated education (2nd ed., pp. 17–24). Boston: World Association for Cooperative Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guile, D., & Griffith, T. (2001). Learning through work experience. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 113–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, J. (2012). Practice-based education pedagogy: Situated, capability-development, relationship practice(s). In J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings, & F. Trede (Eds.), Practice-based education: Perspectives and strategies (pp. 71–80). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, K., Nerland, M., & Enqvist-Jensen, C. (2015). Higher Education, 70, 867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9872-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johari, A., & Bradshaw, A. (2008). Project-based learning in an internship program: A qualitative study of related roles and their motivational attributes. Educational Technology Research & Development, 56(3), 329–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, N. (2011). Curriculum and curricular orientations in cooperative and work-integrated education. In R. K. Coll & Zegwaard (Eds.), International handbook for cooperative & work-integrated education (2nd ed., pp. 305–311). Boston: World Association for Cooperative Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., Edwards-Groves, C., Wilkinson, J., & Hardy, I. (2012). Ecologies of practices. In P. Hager, A. Lee, & A. Reich (Eds.), Practice, learning and change: Practice-theory perspectives on professional learning (pp. 33–49). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristmansson, P. (2016). Gymnasial lärlingsutbildning på Handels- och administrationsprogrammet: en studie av lärlingsutbildningens förutsättningar och utvecklingen av yrkeskunnande. [Upper secondary apprenticeship education in the business and administration programme – A study of preconditions of upper secondary apprenticeship education and development of professional skills]. Umeå: Umeå universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labaree, D. F. (2010). How Dewey lost: The victory of David Snedden and social efficiency in the reform of American education. In D. Tröhler, T. Schlag, & F. Osterwalder (Eds.), Pragmatism and modernities (pp. 163–188). Leiden: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson. (2001). Industri- och hantverksutbildning under två sekel. Årsböcker i svensk undervisningshistoria [Education for industry and craft during two centuries], 194. Uppsala: Föreningen för svensk undervisningshistoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawn, M. (2011). Standardizing the European education policy space. European Educational Research Journal, 10(2), 259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onstenk, J., & Blokhuis, F. (2007). Apprenticeship in the Netherlands: Connecting school- and work-based learning. Education + Training, 49(6), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910710819136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persaud, A. (2017). Integrated planning for education and development. European Journal of Education, 52(4), 448–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SchÖn, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snedden, D. (1977). Fundamental Distinctions between Liberal and Vocational Education. Curriculum Inquiry, 7(1), 41–52. Original published in 1914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenström, M. -L., & Virolainen, M. (2014). The current state and challenges of vocational education and training in Finland. Roskilde: Nord-VET, Roskilde University. Retrieved from http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A66853

  • Sung-Chan, P., & Yuen-Tsang, A. (2008). Bridging the theory-practice gap in social work education: A reflection on action research in China. Social Work Education, 27(1), 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L., Ellström, P., & Åberg, C. (2004). Integration formal and informal learning at work. The Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(8), 479–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W. (1911/1998). The principles of scientific management. Mineola/New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant, M. (2000). Learning to work, working to learning: Theories of situational education. In C. Symes & J. McIntyre (Eds.), Working knowledge: The new vocationalism and higher education. Ballmoor: The Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virtanen, A., Tynjälä, P., & Collin. (2009). Characteristics of workplace learning among Finnish vocational students. Vocations and Learning, 2(3), 153–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1926/1997). Chap. 10. Psychological understanding of occupational education. In Educational psychology. Boca Raton: St. Lucie Press. (Original published in Russian 1926).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S. (1988). From Fordism to flexibility? The case of the U.S. car industry. In R. Hyman & W. Streeck (Eds.), Trade unions technology and industrial democracy (pp. 101–127). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarojni Choy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Choy, S., Wärvik, GB., Lindberg, V. (2018). Integration Between School and Work: Developments, Conceptions and Applications. In: Choy, S., Wärvik, GB., Lindberg, V. (eds) Integration of Vocational Education and Training Experiences. Technical and Vocational Education and Training: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 29. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8857-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8857-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8856-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8857-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics