Differences in Perceiving Narratives Through Screens or Reality

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics book series (ICCN)


Understanding a narrative requires a high level of attention. Today, we are used to perceive narratives not only in real world but also through screens. Here, we approach the visual perception of those narratives by the viewer’s eyeblink rate in different situations: while watching videos with narratives, watching videos without narratives, listening to narratives with no video, watching videos with the same narrative but different editing styles, and looking the same narrative in real performance. Watching videos with narratives decreases eyeblink rate. Video editing style affects eyeblink rate, regardless of narratives. The type of stimulus, in which a narrative is viewed, screened, or performed, affects eyeblink rate. Media professionals show a significant lower eyeblink rate than non-media professionals while perceiving narratives.


Cinema perception Attention Vision Professionalization Screens Reality 


  1. 1.
    Burch, N.: La Lucarne de l’infini. Naissance du langage cinématographique, Nathan (1991)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bordwell, D., Staiger, J., Thompson, K.: Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style and Mode of Production to 1960, 1st edn. Routledge, London (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bordwell, D.: Intensified continuity: visual style in contemporary American film. Film Q. 55, 16–28 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nielsen.: The Total Audience Report: Q1 2016 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carroll, N., Seeley, W.P.: Cognitivism, psychology, and neuroscience: movies as attentional engines. In: Shimamura, A.P. (ed.) Psychocinematics. Exploring Cognition at the Movies, pp. 53–75. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Skotte, J.H., Nøjgaard, J.K., Jørgensen, L.V., Christensen, K.B., Sjøgaard, G.: Eye blink frequency during different computer tasks quantified by electrooculography. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 99(2007), 113–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    VanderWerf, F., Brassinga, P., Reits, D., Aramideh, M., Ongerboer de Visser, B.: Eyelid movements: behavioral studies of blinking in humans under different stimulus conditions. J. Neurophysiol. 89, 2784–2796 (2003)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stern, J., Boyer, D., Schroeder, D.: Blink rate: a possible measure of fatigue. Hum. Factors. 36, 285–297 (1994)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Delgado-García, J.M., Gruart, A., Múnera, A.: Neural organization of eyelid responses. Mov. Disord., Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 17, S33–S36 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bour, L., Aramideh, M., Ongerboer de Visser, B.W.: Neurophysiological aspects of eye and eyelid movements during blinking in humans. J. Neurophysiol. 83, 166–176 (2000)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fogarty, C., Stern, J.A.: Eye movements and blinks: their relationship to higher cognitive processes. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 8, 35–42 (1989)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wiseman, R., Nakano, T.: Blink and you’ll miss it: the role of blinking in the perception of magic tricks. PeerJ. 4, e1873 (2016)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nakano, T., Yamamoto, Y., Kitajo, K., Takahashi, T., Kitazawa, S.: Synchronization of spontaneous eyeblinks while viewing video stories. Proceed. Biol. Sci./R. Soc. 276, 3635–3644 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Andreu-Sánchez, C., Martín-Pascual, M.A., Gruart, A., Delgado-García, J.M.: Eyeblink rate watching classical Hollywood and post-classical MTV editing styles, in media and non-media professionals. Sci. Rep. 7, 43267 (2017)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Murch, W.: In the Blink of an Eye: A Perspective on Film Editing. Silman-James Press, Los Angeles (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Andreu-Sánchez, C., Martín-Pascual, M.A., Gruart, A., Delgado-García, J.M.: Looking at reality versus watching screens: media professionalization effects on the spontaneous eyeblink rate. PLoS One. 12, 0176030 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lotze, M., Scheler, G., Tan, H.-R., Braun, C., Birbaumer, N.: The musician’s brain: functional imaging of amateurs and professionals during performance and imagery. NeuroImage. 20, 1817–1829 (2003)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zheng, B., Jiang, X., Tien, G., Meneghetti, A.: Workload assessment of surgeons: correlation between NASA TLX and blinks. Surg. Endosc. Other Interventional Tech. 26, 2746–2750 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Faubert, J.: Professional athletes have extraordinary skills for rapidly learning complex and neutral dynamic visual scenes. Sci. Rep. 3, 1154 (2013)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maguire, E.A., Gadian, D.G., Johnsrude, I.S., Good, C.D., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R.S.J., Frith, C.D.: Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 4398–4403 (2000)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maguire, E.A., Woollett, K., Spiers, H.J.: London taxi drivers and bus drivers: a structural MRI and neuropsychological analysis. Hippocampus. 16, 1091–1101 (2006)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Colzato, L.S., Slagter, H.A., Spapé, M.M.A., Hommel, B.: Blinks of the eye predict blinks of the mind. Neuropsychologia. 46, 3179–3183 (2008)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Neuro-Com Research GroupUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Division of NeurosciencePablo de Olavide UniversitySevilleSpain

Personalised recommendations