Advertisement

Optical Wireless Systems with DPSK and Manchester Coding

Conference paper
  • 1.3k Downloads
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 828)

Abstract

Free-space optical (FSO) communication is an alternative method of allocating high bandwidth links in short to medium range over RF communication systems. It is observed as a growing increase in research and development activities over the past few years due to the innumerous advantages. The advantages of FSO communication include a much larger data rate, lower power consumption, more compact equipment, greater security against eavesdropping, better protection against electromagnetic interference and license free data transmission. However, the performance of the FSO system is greatly influenced by atmospheric temperature, pressure, humidity etc. To overcome these challenges various techniques have been proposed in the literature. Generally, the average bit error rate (BER) and quality factor (Q-factor) are prime parameters to measure the performance of the FSO systems. In this paper, a comparative study and mathematical modeling have been done using differential phase shift keying (DPSK) modulation technique with Manchester coding to conventional DPSK modulation technique for different FSO configurations. Manchester encoding synchronizes the signal itself; hence, it minimizes the error rate and optimizes the reliability of the system. For analyzing, the low to high turbulence level of atmosphere Gamma-Gamma type channel model is preferred.

Keywords

DPSK Scintillation OWC Diffused channel Manchester coding 

References

  1. 1.
    Seeds, A., Shams, H., Fice, M., Renaud, C.: TeraHertz photonics for wireless communications. J. Lightwave Technol. 33, 579–587 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar, N., Rana, A.K.: Impact of various parameters on the performance of free space optics communication system. Optik (Stuttg.) 124, 5774–5776 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.04.062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khalighi, M.A., Uysal, M.: Survey on free space optical communication: a communication theory perspective. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 16, 2231–2258 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2014.2329501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang, Z., Zhong, W.D., Fu, S., Lin, C.: Performance comparison of different modulation formats over free-space optical (FSO) turbulence links with space diversity reception technique. IEEE Photonics J. 1, 277–285 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2009.2039015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Popoola, W., Ghassemlooy, Z., Leitgeb, E.: BER and outage probability of DPSK subcarrier intensity modulated free space optics in fully developed speckle. J. Commun. 4, 546–554 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agrawal, G.P.: Fiber-Optic Communications Systems, 3rd edn. (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Majumdar, A.K.: Free-space laser communication performance in the atmospheric channel. J. Opt. Fiber Commun. Rep. 2, 345–396 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10297-005-0054-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Binh, L.N.: Digital Optical Communications. CRC Press, London, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Forouzan, A.B.: Data Communications and Networking. McGraw-Hill, New York (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang, J.Z.J., Chi, N.C.N., Holm-Nielsen, P.V., Peucheret, C., Jeppesen, P.: Method for high-speed Manchester encoded optical signal generation. In: Optical Fiber Communication Conference 2004, OFC 2004, vol. 1, p. 2800 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ofc.2004.1359241
  11. 11.
    Chi, N., Huang, D.: Improved label property of orthogonal ASK/DPSK labeling by using a 40 Gb/s Manchester coded payload. In: OFC/NFOEC 2007 - Optical Fiber Communication and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference, pp. 6–8 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ofc.2007.4348769
  12. 12.
    Patnaik, B., Sahu, P.K.: Inter-satellite optical wireless communication system design and simulation. IET Commun. 6, 2561–2567 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2012.0044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prabu, K., Kumar, D.S., Srinivas, T.: Performance analysis of FSO links under strong atmospheric turbulence conditions using various modulation schemes. Optik (Stuttg.) 125, 5573–5581 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2014.07.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Illinois, J.L.L., Patel, B.P.: Line coding. In: Mobile Communications Handbook. CRC Press (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Telecommunication EngineeringIIIT BhubaneswarBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations