Advertisement

Partnering with Schools Beyond Professional Experience: Building Equity-Centred ITE Programme Alignment and Coherence

  • Fiona Ell
  • Lexie Grudnoff
  • Mavis Haigh
  • Mary F. Hill
Chapter

Abstract

Uncertainty about teacher education around the world abounds as providers grapple with the challenge of preparing teachers who can foster the learning of increasingly diverse student populations. Hence, the policy focus in New Zealand, as in other nations, is on improving the quality of initial teacher education (ITE) through strengthening professional experience and school–university partnerships. This chapter reports a qualitative study that investigated how engagement in a school–university collaborative research project outside of ITE contributed to a New Zealand equity-centred teacher education programme’s alignment and coherence. We interviewed teachers and teacher educators participating in the research project and teaching on the programme. Directed thematic data analysis identified three major themes—awareness, articulation and action. Using concepts from complexity theory, the study illustrates how building relationships with schools that extend beyond professional experience can occasion the emergence of deeper and shared understandings about practice for equity, reducing uncertainty and contributing to ITE programme alignment and coherence.

Keywords

Initial teacher education School–university partnerships Equity Complexity 

References

  1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity theory and the social sciences. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Carter, A. (2015). Review of initial teacher training (ITT). Downloaded from www.gov.uk/government/publications.
  4. Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Teacher research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, New Jersey: American Educational Research Association and Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Cochran-Smith, M., Ell, F., Ludlow, L., Grudnoff, L., Haigh, M., & Hill, M. (2014). When complexity theory meets critical realism: A platform for research on initial teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 41(1), 105–122.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2010). “If things were simple …”: Complexity in education. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16, 856–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2012). Fitting teacher education in/to/for an increasingly complex world. Complicity, 9(1), 30–40.Google Scholar
  11. Education Council. (2016) Strategic options for developing future oriented initial teacher education. Downloaded from https://educationcouncil.org.nz.
  12. Flick, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Grossman, P. (2010). Learning to practice: The design of clinical experiences in teacher preparation. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education & National Education Association.Google Scholar
  14. Grudnoff, L., Haigh, M., Hill, M. F., Cochran-Smith, M., Ell, F., & Ludlow, L. (2017a). Teaching for equity: Insights from international evidence. The Curriculum Journal, 28(3), 305–326.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.1292934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grudnoff, L., Haigh, M., & Mackisack, V. (2017b). Re-envisaging and reinvigorating school-university practicum partnerships. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 45(2), 180–193.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2016.1201043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Le Cornu, R. (2015). Key components of effective professional experience in initial teacher education in Australia. A paper prepared for the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  18. Lefever-Davis, S., Johnson, C., & Pearman, C. (2007). Two sides of a partnership: Egalitarianism and empowerment in school-university partnerships. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(4), 204–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mason, M. (Ed.). (2008). Complexity theory and the philosophy of education. West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. McIntyre, D. (2009). The difficulties of inclusive pedagogy for initial teacher education and some thoughts on the way forward. Teachers and Teacher Education, 25, 602–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morrison, K. (2008). Educational philosophy and the challenge of complexity theory. In M. Mason (Ed.), Complexity theory and the philosophy of education (pp. 16–31). West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nieto, S. (2000). Placing equity front and center: Some thoughts on transforming teacher education for a new century. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 180–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pullen, D. (2017). What counts? Who is counting? Teacher education improvement and accountability in a data-driven era. In J. Nuttall, A. Kostogriz, M. Jones, & J. Martin (Eds.), Teacher education policy and practice: Evidence of impact, impact of evidence (pp. 3–16). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reid, J. A. (2011). A practice turn for teacher education? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group [TEMAG]. (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Retrieved from https://www.studentsfirst.gov.au/teacher-education-ministerial-advisory-group.
  26. Teaching and Learning Research Initiative. (n.d.). Home page http://tlri.org.nz/.
  27. Timperley, H., Kaser, L., & Halbert, J. (2014). A framework for transforming learning in schools: Innovation and the spiral, Seminar series: Vol. 234. Melbourne: Centre for Strategic Education.Google Scholar
  28. UNESCO. (2014). Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all, EFA Global Monitoring Report. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. University of Auckland, Faculty of Education and Social Work. (2017). Master of teaching EDPROF 758: Inquiring into practice. Auckland, NZ: Author.Google Scholar
  30. Waks, L. (2011). Teacher education programs as complex organizations. Emerging Changes in Teacher Education, 8(1), 65–69.Google Scholar
  31. Wertsch, J., Del Rio, P., & Alvarez, A. (Eds.). (1995). Sociocultural studies of the mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fiona Ell
    • 1
  • Lexie Grudnoff
    • 1
  • Mavis Haigh
    • 1
  • Mary F. Hill
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations