Partnering with Schools Beyond Professional Experience: Building Equity-Centred ITE Programme Alignment and Coherence
Uncertainty about teacher education around the world abounds as providers grapple with the challenge of preparing teachers who can foster the learning of increasingly diverse student populations. Hence, the policy focus in New Zealand, as in other nations, is on improving the quality of initial teacher education (ITE) through strengthening professional experience and school–university partnerships. This chapter reports a qualitative study that investigated how engagement in a school–university collaborative research project outside of ITE contributed to a New Zealand equity-centred teacher education programme’s alignment and coherence. We interviewed teachers and teacher educators participating in the research project and teaching on the programme. Directed thematic data analysis identified three major themes—awareness, articulation and action. Using concepts from complexity theory, the study illustrates how building relationships with schools that extend beyond professional experience can occasion the emergence of deeper and shared understandings about practice for equity, reducing uncertainty and contributing to ITE programme alignment and coherence.
KeywordsInitial teacher education School–university partnerships Equity Complexity
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Byrne, D. (1998). Complexity theory and the social sciences. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Carter, A. (2015). Review of initial teacher training (ITT). Downloaded from www.gov.uk/government/publications.
- Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Teacher research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. (Eds.). (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, New Jersey: American Educational Research Association and Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Cochran-Smith, M., Ell, F., Ludlow, L., Grudnoff, L., Haigh, M., & Hill, M. (2014). When complexity theory meets critical realism: A platform for research on initial teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 41(1), 105–122.Google Scholar
- Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2012). Fitting teacher education in/to/for an increasingly complex world. Complicity, 9(1), 30–40.Google Scholar
- Education Council. (2016) Strategic options for developing future oriented initial teacher education. Downloaded from https://educationcouncil.org.nz.
- Flick, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Grossman, P. (2010). Learning to practice: The design of clinical experiences in teacher preparation. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education & National Education Association.Google Scholar
- Le Cornu, R. (2015). Key components of effective professional experience in initial teacher education in Australia. A paper prepared for the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, Melbourne.Google Scholar
- Mason, M. (Ed.). (2008). Complexity theory and the philosophy of education. West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Pullen, D. (2017). What counts? Who is counting? Teacher education improvement and accountability in a data-driven era. In J. Nuttall, A. Kostogriz, M. Jones, & J. Martin (Eds.), Teacher education policy and practice: Evidence of impact, impact of evidence (pp. 3–16). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group [TEMAG]. (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teachers. Retrieved from https://www.studentsfirst.gov.au/teacher-education-ministerial-advisory-group.
- Teaching and Learning Research Initiative. (n.d.). Home page http://tlri.org.nz/.
- Timperley, H., Kaser, L., & Halbert, J. (2014). A framework for transforming learning in schools: Innovation and the spiral, Seminar series: Vol. 234. Melbourne: Centre for Strategic Education.Google Scholar
- UNESCO. (2014). Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all, EFA Global Monitoring Report. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing.Google Scholar
- University of Auckland, Faculty of Education and Social Work. (2017). Master of teaching EDPROF 758: Inquiring into practice. Auckland, NZ: Author.Google Scholar
- Waks, L. (2011). Teacher education programs as complex organizations. Emerging Changes in Teacher Education, 8(1), 65–69.Google Scholar
- Wertsch, J., Del Rio, P., & Alvarez, A. (Eds.). (1995). Sociocultural studies of the mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar