Listening to Mentor Teachers’ Voices in Uncertain Times

Chapter

Abstract

One characteristic of the uncertain times in teacher education is the complexity involved in operationalising the various standards and policy documents when little attention is given to how best to use the time in school-based practicum so that it is both educative and purposeful. This is a “wicked problem” to which various theories and literature miss the mark if not informed by those at the coalface. We argue that to navigate this complex terrain we need to include the voice of the mentor teacher. Up to this point, there has been a global silence on the crucial importance of this voice. Yet, in many instances, the mentor teachers develop considerable expertise and professional judgements about how to produce confident, capable, resilient and reflective novice teachers. This voice needs to be recognised and listened to in, not only informing policy and articulating standards but in bridging the gap between policy and practice. Our research investigated how mentor teachers, working within a program where pre-service teachers had significant amounts of practicum time, and in a context of high Education Needs Index schools, understood teaching pre-service teachers to teach. Through qualitative inquiry using the method of a case study, this chapter investigates the views of 30 mentor teachers across 12 schools (both primary and secondary). The broad themes from our data analysis are relationships, reciprocity, responsibility and reflection. We argue that these aspects add a rich and crucial dimension to standard statements and pedagogy around school-based mentoring.

Keywords

Relationships Mentoring Intentionality Teachers’ voice Pre-service teacher education 

References

  1. Allen, J. M., Howells, K., & Radford, R. (2013). A ‘partnership in teaching excellence’: Ways in which one school–university partnership has fostered teacher development. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrosetti, A. (2014). Are you ready to be a mentor? Preparing teachers for mentoring pre-service teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(6), 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2011). National professional standards for teachers. Canberra: Ministerial Council for Education Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Bazeley, P. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bullough, R. V., Jr. (2005). Being and becoming a mentor: School-based teacher educators and teacher educator identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cain, T. (2009). Mentoring trainee teachers: How can mentors use research? Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 17(1), 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2001). Beyond certainty: Taking an inquiry stance on practice. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 45–58). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cochran-Smith, M., & Paris, C. L. (1995). Mentor and mentoring: Did Homer have it right? In J. Smyth (Ed.), Critical discourses on teacher development (pp. 181–202). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  11. Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (Eds.). (2010). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, D. K., McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (1993). Teaching for understanding: Challenges, for practice, research, and policy. New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Darling-Hammond, L., & Lieberman, A. (2012). Teacher education around the world: Changing policies and practices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Evelein, F. G., & Korthagen, F. (2015). Practicing core reflection: Activities and lessons for teaching and learning from within. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Feiman-Nemser, S. (1998). Teachers as teacher educators. European Journal of Teacher Education, 21(1), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2012). Teachers as learners. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  19. Feiman-Nemser, S., & Beasley, K. (2007). Discovering and sharing knowledge: Inventing a new role for cooperating teachers. In D. Carroll, H. Featherstone, J. Featherstone, S. Feiman-Nemser, & D. Roosevelt (Eds.), Transforming teacher education: Reflections from the field (pp. 139–160). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  22. Hagger, H., & McIntyre, D. (2006). Learning teaching from teachers: Realising the potential of school-based teacher education. Maidenhead, Berks: McGraw-Hill International.Google Scholar
  23. Hamel, F. L., & Jaasko-Fisher, H. A. (2011). Hidden labor in the mentoring of pre-service teachers: Notes from a mentor advisory council. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 434–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Grossman, P., Rust, F., & Shulman, L. S. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 390–441). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hennissen, P., Crasborn, F., Brouwer, N., Korthagen, F., & Bergen, T. (2011). Clarifying pre-service teacher perceptions of mentor teachers’ developing use of mentoring skills. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(6), 1049–1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hobson, A. J., Ashby, P., Malderez, A., & Tomlinson, P. D. (2009). Mentoring beginning teachers: What we know and what we don’t. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Le Cornu, R. (2012). School co-ordinators: Leaders of learning in professional experience. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Le Cornu, R. (2015). Key components of effective professional experience in initial teacher education in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership.Google Scholar
  32. Le Cornu, R. (2016). Professional experience: Learning from the past to build the future. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 80–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Little, J. W. (1990). The mentor phenomenon and the social organization of teaching. Review of Research in Education, 16, 297–351.Google Scholar
  34. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  36. Southgate, E., Reynolds, R., & Howley, P. (2013). Professional experience as a wicked problem in initial teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 31, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stake, R. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Valencia, S. W., Martin, S. D., Place, N. A., & Grossman, P. (2009). Complex interactions in student teaching: Lost opportunities for learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 304–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van Ginkel, G., Verloop, N., & Denessen, E. (2016). Why mentor? Linking mentor teachers’ motivations to their mentoring conceptions. Teachers and Teaching, 22(1), 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Wang, J., & Odell, S. J. (2006). An alternative conception of mentor–novice relationships: Learning to teach in reform-minded ways as a context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 473–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2007). Mentor teachers’ work with prospective teachers in a newly formed professional development school: Two illustrations. Teachers College Record, 109(3), 669–698.Google Scholar
  43. Yendol-Hoppey, D., Jacobs, J., & Dana, N. F. (2009). Critical concepts of mentoring in an urban context. The New Educator, 5, 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations