Skip to main content

Seeds of STEM: The Development of a Problem-Based STEM Curriculum for Early Childhood Classrooms

Part of the Early Mathematics Learning and Development book series (EMLD)

Abstract

This chapter adds to the body of research on engineering in early childhood education by describing the multiple research components associated with the development of an early childhood engineering curriculum, Seeds of STEM. Since very few research studies were devoted to the topic of engineering in early childhood , the Seeds of STEM research team was charged with developing many of the tools and instruments to be used throughout the project. The chapter describes the research conducted by the Seeds of STEM team in order to establish the framework for the curriculum, the development process, evaluation of fidelity of implementation, as well as the effectiveness of the curriculum. More specifically, the chapter addresses the following questions on curriculum development research: (a) Who should be part of the curriculum development team? (b) What is a successful curriculum development process? (c) What principles should guide the Seeds of STEM units? (d) How should the curriculum’s effectiveness be measured? and (e) What measures should be taken to ensure fidelity of implementation?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-8621-2_12
  • Chapter length: 21 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-981-10-8621-2
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 12.1
Fig. 12.2

References

  • Ackerman, D. & Barnett, S. (2005). Prepared for kindergarten: What does “readiness” mean? National Institute for Early Education Research Policy Brief.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2015). Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: The teacher’s experience. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(1), 112–128.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bagiati, A., Yoon, S. Y., Evangelou, D., & Ngambeki, I. (2010). Engineering curricula in early education: Describing the landscape of open resources. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12(2), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, B. T., Donovan, M. S., & Burns, M. S. (Eds.). (2001). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenneman, K. (2011). Assessment for preschool science learning and learning environments. Early Childhood Research and Practice 13(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenneman, K., Stevenson-Boyd, J., & Frede, E. (2009). Math and science in preschool: Policies and practices. National Institute for Early Education Research Policy Brief.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. The Research Journal for Engineering Education, 369–387.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cabell, S., Justice, L. M., Konold, T., & McGinty, A. (2011). Profiles of emergent literacy skills among preschool children who are at-risk for academic difficulties. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(1), 1–14.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Camilli, G., Vargas, S., Ryan, S., & Barnett, W. S. (2010). Meta-analysis of the effects of early education interventions on cognitive and social development. Teachers College Record, 112(3), 579–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Care, E., Denas, J., & Brown, R. (2007). The realism and sex type of four- to five-year-old children’s occupational aspirations. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 5, 155–168.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • CCNY (Carnegie Corporation of New York). (2009). The opportunity equation—Transforming mathematics and science education for citizenship and the global economy. Available https://www.carnegie.org/media/filer_public/80/c8/80c8a7bc-c7ab-4f49-847d-1e2966f4dd97/ccny_report_2009_opportunityequation.pdf. Accessed February 18, 2016.

  • Century, J., Rudnick, M., & Freeman, C. (2010). A framework for measuring fidelity of implementation: A foundation for shared language and accumulation of knowledge. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(2), 199–218.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Christenson, L. A., & James, J. (2015). Building bridges to understanding in a preschool classroom: A morning in the block center. Young Children, 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clasessens, A., Duncan, G., & Engel, M. (2009). Kindergarten skills and fifth grade achievement: Evidence from the ECLS-K. Economics of Education Review, 28, 415–427.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H. (2007). Curriculum research: Toward a framework for ‘research-based curricula’. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 35–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., & Uhry, J. (2011). Naming block structures: A multimodal approach. Early Education Journal, 39, 79–87.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C. (2009). Engineering is elementary. The Bridge, 39(3), 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C. M., & Lachapelle, C. P. (2007). Engineering is Elementary: Children’s changing understandings of science and engineering. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C., & Lachapelle, C. (2010). The impact of Engineering is Elementary (EiE) on students’ attitudes toward engineering and science. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Louisville, KY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Custer, R., & Daugherty, J. (2009). Professional development for teachers of engineering: Research and related activities. The Bridge, 39(3), 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton Regional STEM Center (2011). STEM Education Quality Framework. Available http://daytonregionalstemcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Final-Framework-copyrighted.pdf.

  • Diamond, K. E., Justice, L. M., Siegler, R. S., & Snyder, P. A. (2013). Synthesis of IES research on early intervention and early childhood education (NCSER 2013–3001). Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, K. E., & Powell, D. R. (2011). An iterative approach to the development of a professional development intervention for head start teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(1), 75–93.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dubosarsky, M., Murphy, B., Roehrig, G., Frost, L. C., Jones, J., Carlson, S. P. … Bement, J. (2011). Animal tracks on the playground, minnows in the sensory table: Incorporating cultural themes to promote preschoolers’ critical thinking in American Indian Head Start classrooms. Young Children, 66(5), 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, F. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessent, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanove, P., et al. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., & Harold, R. D. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents' socialization of gender differences. Journal of social issues, 46(2), 183–201.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Eshach, H. (2006). Science literacy in primary schools and pre-schools. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelou, D. (2010). Child development perspective in engineering education: Why STEM now? Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. (2013). America’s children: Key national indicators of well-being. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E. H., & Sherman, J. A. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization, and sociocultural factors. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 51–71.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • French, L. (2004). Science as the center of a coherent, integrated early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 138–149.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, S. A. (1999). Concept development in preschool children. Dialogue on early childhood science, mathematics, and technology education. Washington, DC: Project 2061, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genishi, C., & Goodwin, A. L. (2008). Diversities in early childhood education: Rethinking and doing. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H., Lee, J., & Boyd, J. (2008). Mathematics education for young children: What it is and how to promote it. Social Policy Report, 22, 1–23.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gorey, K. M. (2001). Early childhood education: A meta-analytic affirmation of the short- and long-term benefits of educational opportunity. School Psychology Quarterly, 16(1), 9–30.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gormley, W. T., Phillips, D., & Gayer, T. (2008). Preschool programs can boost school readiness. Science, 320, 1723–1724.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, D. B., Jirout, J., Dominguez, X., Greenberg, A., Maier, M., & Fuccillo, J. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: A programmatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education and Development, 20(2), 238–264.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2008) Why so few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. AAUW http://www.aauw.org/files/2013/02/Why-So-Few-Women-in-Science-Technology-Engineering-and-Mathematics.pdf.

  • Hjalmarson, M., Diefes-Dux, H. A., & Moore, T. (2008). Designing model development sequences for engineering. In J. Zawojewski, K. Bowman, & H. A. Diefes-Dux (Eds.), Mathematical modeling in engineering education: Designing experiences for all students. Roterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, M. C., Purzer, S., & Cardella, M. E. (2011). Elementary teacher’s views about teaching design, engineering, and technology. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1, 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. (1985). Gender differences in math ability: The impact of media reports on parents. Educational researcher, 14(3), 20–25.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jenniches, S., & Didion, C. (2009). Engineergirl! A website to interest girls in engineering. The Bridge, 39(3), 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (2009). The status and nature of K-12 engineering education in the United States. The Bridge, 39(3), 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L. G. (2010). STEM in the early years. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12(2), 11–19. Retrieved from: http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/beyond/seed/katz.html.

  • Kinzie, M. B., Pianta, R. C., Kilday, C. R., McGuire, P. R., & Pinkham, A. M. (2009, March). Development of curricula, teacher supports, and assessments for pre-kindergarten mathematics and science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE), Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 495.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Levitch, A. & Gable, S. (2016). Reducing stereotyping in the preschool classroom. Available http://extension.missouri.edu/hes/childcare/reducestereotype.htm. Accessed February 18, 2016.

  • Lindeman, K. W., Jabot, M., & Berkley, M. T. (2013). The role of STEM (or STEAM) in the early childhood setting. In L. E. Cohen & S. Waite-Stupiansky (Eds.), Learning Across the Early Childhood Curriculum, 17, 95–114. Advances in Early Education and Day Care series. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, S. (2001). ‘‘Science for all’’ is not equal to ‘‘One size fits all’’: Linguistic and cultural diversity and science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 622–627.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 71–85.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Moomaw, S. (2012). STEM begins in the early years. School Science and Mathematics, 112, 57–58.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering. (2006). Tech tally: Approaches to assessing technological literacy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering, & National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. In R. J Shavelson & L Towne (Eds.), Committee on scientific principles for education research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSB (National Science Board). (2007). A national action plan for addressing the critical needs of the U.S. science, technology, education, and mathematics education system. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • New, R. S. (1999). Playing fair and square: Issues of equity in preschool mathematics, science, and technology. Dialogue on Early Childhood Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education: Fostering High Quality Programs. Washington, DC: Project 2061, American Association for the Advancement of Science. http://www.project2061.org/publications/earlychild/online/fostering/new.htm.

  • Novak, J. D. (1977). A theory of education. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, C. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 33–84.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1961). The child’s conception of number. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, D. R., Son, S., File, N., & San Juan, R. R. (2010). Parent-school relationships and children’s academic and social outcomes in public school pre-kindergarten. Journal of School Psychology, 48(4), 269–292.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L. C., & Hill, H. T. (2003). Using children’s literature to debunk gender stereotypes. In Carol Copple (Ed.), A world of difference: Readings on teaching young children in a diverse society (pp. 125–127).

    Google Scholar 

  • Samarapungavan, A., Mantzicopoulos, P., & Patrick, H. (2008). Learning science through inquiry in kindergarten. Science Education, 92(5), 868–908.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schunn, C. D. (2009). How kids learn engineering: The cognitive science perspective. The Bridge: Linking engineering and society. US: National Academy of engineering of the National Academies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleeter, C. E., & Grant, C. A. (1999). Making choices for multicultural education: Five approaches to race, class and gender (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneider, C. I. (Ed.). (2014). The go-to guide for engineering curricula, preK-5: Choosing and using the best instructional materials for your students. Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, J., Hamilton, A., Oxley, E., Eastman, A. M., & Brent, R. (2012). Young thinkers in motion: Problem solving and physics in preschool. Young Children, 67, 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center, Southern Poverty Law. (1997). Gender learning in early childhood. Starting small: Teaching tolerance in preschool and the early grades (pp. 50–54). Author. Reprinted: Montgomery, AL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, A., Kazakoff, E. R., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The wheels on the bot go round and round: Robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 12, 203–219.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Swim, J. K. (1994). Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 21–36.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Crespo, M. N., Kraatz, E., & Pallansch, L. (2014). From fearing STEM to Playing with It: The natural integration of STEM into the preschool classroom. Journal of the Southeastern Regional Association of Teacher Educators, 23(2), 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunks, K. W. (2009). Block play: Practical suggestions for common dilemmas. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 37, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2007). The Nation’s Report Card: America’s high school graduates: Results from the 2005 NAEP High School Transcript Study, by C. Shettle et al. (NCES 2007-467) Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Meeteren, B., & Zan, B. (2010). Revealing the work of young engineers in early childhood education. Early Childhood Research and Practice. Collected Papers from the SEED (STEM in Early Education and Development) Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Werner-Avidon, M., Newton, L., Randol, S., Smith, B., & Walker, G. (2013). Ingenuity in action: Connecting tinkering to engineering design processes. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 3, 1–23.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 529–552.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, W. (n.d.). Engineering Lens. Retrieved from: http://www.integratingengineering.org/index.html.

  • Worth, K. (2010). Science in early childhood classrooms: Content and process. Collected Papers from the SEED (STEM in Early Education and Development) Conference. Retrieved from: http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/beyond/seed/worth.html.

  • Wynn, T., & Harris, J. (2013). Toward a STEM and arts curriculum: Creating the teacher team. Art Education, 65, 42–47.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, through Grant R305A150571 to Worcester Polytechnic Institute. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the US Department of Education.

The authors would like to thank Dr. Katherine Chen and Leah Reppucci for their thoughtful comments and feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mia Dubosarsky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dubosarsky, M., John, M.S., Anggoro, F., Wunnava, S., Celik, U. (2018). Seeds of STEM: The Development of a Problem-Based STEM Curriculum for Early Childhood Classrooms. In: English, L., Moore, T. (eds) Early Engineering Learning. Early Mathematics Learning and Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8621-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8621-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8620-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8621-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)