Advertisement

Seeds of STEM: The Development of a Problem-Based STEM Curriculum for Early Childhood Classrooms

  • Mia DubosarskyEmail author
  • Melissa Sue John
  • Florencia Anggoro
  • Susmitha Wunnava
  • Ugur Celik
Chapter
Part of the Early Mathematics Learning and Development book series (EMLD)

Abstract

This chapter adds to the body of research on engineering in early childhood education by describing the multiple research components associated with the development of an early childhood engineering curriculum, Seeds of STEM. Since very few research studies were devoted to the topic of engineering in early childhood, the Seeds of STEM research team was charged with developing many of the tools and instruments to be used throughout the project. The chapter describes the research conducted by the Seeds of STEM team in order to establish the framework for the curriculum, the development process, evaluation of fidelity of implementation, as well as the effectiveness of the curriculum. More specifically, the chapter addresses the following questions on curriculum development research: (a) Who should be part of the curriculum development team? (b) What is a successful curriculum development process? (c) What principles should guide the Seeds of STEM units? (d) How should the curriculum’s effectiveness be measured? and (e) What measures should be taken to ensure fidelity of implementation?

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, through Grant R305A150571 to Worcester Polytechnic Institute. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the US Department of Education.

The authors would like to thank Dr. Katherine Chen and Leah Reppucci for their thoughtful comments and feedback.

References

  1. Ackerman, D. & Barnett, S. (2005). Prepared for kindergarten: What does “readiness” mean? National Institute for Early Education Research Policy Brief.Google Scholar
  2. Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2015). Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: The teacher’s experience. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(1), 112–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagiati, A., Yoon, S. Y., Evangelou, D., & Ngambeki, I. (2010). Engineering curricula in early education: Describing the landscape of open resources. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12(2), 1–15.Google Scholar
  4. Bowman, B. T., Donovan, M. S., & Burns, M. S. (Eds.). (2001). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brenneman, K. (2011). Assessment for preschool science learning and learning environments. Early Childhood Research and Practice 13(1).Google Scholar
  6. Brenneman, K., Stevenson-Boyd, J., & Frede, E. (2009). Math and science in preschool: Policies and practices. National Institute for Early Education Research Policy Brief.Google Scholar
  7. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. The Research Journal for Engineering Education, 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cabell, S., Justice, L. M., Konold, T., & McGinty, A. (2011). Profiles of emergent literacy skills among preschool children who are at-risk for academic difficulties. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Camilli, G., Vargas, S., Ryan, S., & Barnett, W. S. (2010). Meta-analysis of the effects of early education interventions on cognitive and social development. Teachers College Record, 112(3), 579–620.Google Scholar
  10. Care, E., Denas, J., & Brown, R. (2007). The realism and sex type of four- to five-year-old children’s occupational aspirations. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 5, 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CCNY (Carnegie Corporation of New York). (2009). The opportunity equation—Transforming mathematics and science education for citizenship and the global economy. Available https://www.carnegie.org/media/filer_public/80/c8/80c8a7bc-c7ab-4f49-847d-1e2966f4dd97/ccny_report_2009_opportunityequation.pdf. Accessed February 18, 2016.
  12. Century, J., Rudnick, M., & Freeman, C. (2010). A framework for measuring fidelity of implementation: A foundation for shared language and accumulation of knowledge. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(2), 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christenson, L. A., & James, J. (2015). Building bridges to understanding in a preschool classroom: A morning in the block center. Young Children, 26–31.Google Scholar
  14. Clasessens, A., Duncan, G., & Engel, M. (2009). Kindergarten skills and fifth grade achievement: Evidence from the ECLS-K. Economics of Education Review, 28, 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clements, D. H. (2007). Curriculum research: Toward a framework for ‘research-based curricula’. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 35–70.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, L., & Uhry, J. (2011). Naming block structures: A multimodal approach. Early Education Journal, 39, 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cunningham, C. (2009). Engineering is elementary. The Bridge, 39(3), 11–17.Google Scholar
  18. Cunningham, C. M., & Lachapelle, C. P. (2007). Engineering is Elementary: Children’s changing understandings of science and engineering. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
  19. Cunningham, C., & Lachapelle, C. (2010). The impact of Engineering is Elementary (EiE) on students’ attitudes toward engineering and science. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Louisville, KY.Google Scholar
  20. Custer, R., & Daugherty, J. (2009). Professional development for teachers of engineering: Research and related activities. The Bridge, 39(3), 18–24.Google Scholar
  21. Dayton Regional STEM Center (2011). STEM Education Quality Framework. Available http://daytonregionalstemcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Final-Framework-copyrighted.pdf.
  22. Diamond, K. E., Justice, L. M., Siegler, R. S., & Snyder, P. A. (2013). Synthesis of IES research on early intervention and early childhood education (NCSER 2013–3001). Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  23. Diamond, K. E., & Powell, D. R. (2011). An iterative approach to the development of a professional development intervention for head start teachers. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(1), 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dubosarsky, M., Murphy, B., Roehrig, G., Frost, L. C., Jones, J., Carlson, S. P. … Bement, J. (2011). Animal tracks on the playground, minnows in the sensory table: Incorporating cultural themes to promote preschoolers’ critical thinking in American Indian Head Start classrooms. Young Children, 66(5), 20–29.Google Scholar
  25. Duncan, F. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessent, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanove, P., et al. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., & Harold, R. D. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents' socialization of gender differences. Journal of social issues, 46(2), 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eshach, H. (2006). Science literacy in primary schools and pre-schools. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Evangelou, D. (2010). Child development perspective in engineering education: Why STEM now? Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12(2).Google Scholar
  29. Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. (2013). America’s children: Key national indicators of well-being. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  30. Fennema, E. H., & Sherman, J. A. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization, and sociocultural factors. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. French, L. (2004). Science as the center of a coherent, integrated early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 138–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gelman, S. A. (1999). Concept development in preschool children. Dialogue on early childhood science, mathematics, and technology education. Washington, DC: Project 2061, American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
  33. Genishi, C., & Goodwin, A. L. (2008). Diversities in early childhood education: Rethinking and doing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Ginsburg, H., Lee, J., & Boyd, J. (2008). Mathematics education for young children: What it is and how to promote it. Social Policy Report, 22, 1–23.Google Scholar
  35. Gorey, K. M. (2001). Early childhood education: A meta-analytic affirmation of the short- and long-term benefits of educational opportunity. School Psychology Quarterly, 16(1), 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gormley, W. T., Phillips, D., & Gayer, T. (2008). Preschool programs can boost school readiness. Science, 320, 1723–1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Greenfield, D. B., Jirout, J., Dominguez, X., Greenberg, A., Maier, M., & Fuccillo, J. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: A programmatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education and Development, 20(2), 238–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2008) Why so few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. AAUW http://www.aauw.org/files/2013/02/Why-So-Few-Women-in-Science-Technology-Engineering-and-Mathematics.pdf.
  39. Hjalmarson, M., Diefes-Dux, H. A., & Moore, T. (2008). Designing model development sequences for engineering. In J. Zawojewski, K. Bowman, & H. A. Diefes-Dux (Eds.), Mathematical modeling in engineering education: Designing experiences for all students. Roterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Hsu, M. C., Purzer, S., & Cardella, M. E. (2011). Elementary teacher’s views about teaching design, engineering, and technology. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1, 31–39.Google Scholar
  41. Jacobs, J. E., & Eccles, J. S. (1985). Gender differences in math ability: The impact of media reports on parents. Educational researcher, 14(3), 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jenniches, S., & Didion, C. (2009). Engineergirl! A website to interest girls in engineering. The Bridge, 39(3), 38–44.Google Scholar
  43. Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (2009). The status and nature of K-12 engineering education in the United States. The Bridge, 39(3), 5–10.Google Scholar
  44. Katz, L. G. (2010). STEM in the early years. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12(2), 11–19. Retrieved from: http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/beyond/seed/katz.html.
  45. Kinzie, M. B., Pianta, R. C., Kilday, C. R., McGuire, P. R., & Pinkham, A. M. (2009, March). Development of curricula, teacher supports, and assessments for pre-kindergarten mathematics and science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (SREE), Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  46. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Levitch, A. & Gable, S. (2016). Reducing stereotyping in the preschool classroom. Available http://extension.missouri.edu/hes/childcare/reducestereotype.htm. Accessed February 18, 2016.
  48. Lindeman, K. W., Jabot, M., & Berkley, M. T. (2013). The role of STEM (or STEAM) in the early childhood setting. In L. E. Cohen & S. Waite-Stupiansky (Eds.), Learning Across the Early Childhood Curriculum, 17, 95–114. Advances in Early Education and Day Care series. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
  49. Lynch, S. (2001). ‘‘Science for all’’ is not equal to ‘‘One size fits all’’: Linguistic and cultural diversity and science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 622–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moomaw, S. (2012). STEM begins in the early years. School Science and Mathematics, 112, 57–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. National Academy of Engineering. (2006). Tech tally: Approaches to assessing technological literacy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  53. National Academy of Engineering, & National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  54. National Research Council. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  55. National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. In R. J Shavelson & L Towne (Eds.), Committee on scientific principles for education research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  56. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  57. NSB (National Science Board). (2007). A national action plan for addressing the critical needs of the U.S. science, technology, education, and mathematics education system. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  58. New, R. S. (1999). Playing fair and square: Issues of equity in preschool mathematics, science, and technology. Dialogue on Early Childhood Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education: Fostering High Quality Programs. Washington, DC: Project 2061, American Association for the Advancement of Science. http://www.project2061.org/publications/earlychild/online/fostering/new.htm.
  59. Novak, J. D. (1977). A theory of education. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  60. O’Donnell, C. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 33–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Piaget, J. (1961). The child’s conception of number. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  62. Powell, D. R., Son, S., File, N., & San Juan, R. R. (2010). Parent-school relationships and children’s academic and social outcomes in public school pre-kindergarten. Journal of School Psychology, 48(4), 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Roberts, L. C., & Hill, H. T. (2003). Using children’s literature to debunk gender stereotypes. In Carol Copple (Ed.), A world of difference: Readings on teaching young children in a diverse society (pp. 125–127).Google Scholar
  64. Samarapungavan, A., Mantzicopoulos, P., & Patrick, H. (2008). Learning science through inquiry in kindergarten. Science Education, 92(5), 868–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schunn, C. D. (2009). How kids learn engineering: The cognitive science perspective. The Bridge: Linking engineering and society. US: National Academy of engineering of the National Academies.Google Scholar
  66. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  67. Sleeter, C. E., & Grant, C. A. (1999). Making choices for multicultural education: Five approaches to race, class and gender (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Merrill.Google Scholar
  68. Sneider, C. I. (Ed.). (2014). The go-to guide for engineering curricula, preK-5: Choosing and using the best instructional materials for your students. Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  69. Stoll, J., Hamilton, A., Oxley, E., Eastman, A. M., & Brent, R. (2012). Young thinkers in motion: Problem solving and physics in preschool. Young Children, 67, 20–26.Google Scholar
  70. Center, Southern Poverty Law. (1997). Gender learning in early childhood. Starting small: Teaching tolerance in preschool and the early grades (pp. 50–54). Author. Reprinted: Montgomery, AL.Google Scholar
  71. Sullivan, A., Kazakoff, E. R., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The wheels on the bot go round and round: Robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 12, 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Swim, J. K. (1994). Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Torres-Crespo, M. N., Kraatz, E., & Pallansch, L. (2014). From fearing STEM to Playing with It: The natural integration of STEM into the preschool classroom. Journal of the Southeastern Regional Association of Teacher Educators, 23(2), 8–16.Google Scholar
  74. Tunks, K. W. (2009). Block play: Practical suggestions for common dilemmas. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 37, 3–8.Google Scholar
  75. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2007). The Nation’s Report Card: America’s high school graduates: Results from the 2005 NAEP High School Transcript Study, by C. Shettle et al. (NCES 2007-467) Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  76. Van Meeteren, B., & Zan, B. (2010). Revealing the work of young engineers in early childhood education. Early Childhood Research and Practice. Collected Papers from the SEED (STEM in Early Education and Development) Conference.Google Scholar
  77. Wang, J., Werner-Avidon, M., Newton, L., Randol, S., Smith, B., & Walker, G. (2013). Ingenuity in action: Connecting tinkering to engineering design processes. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 3, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 529–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wolfson, W. (n.d.). Engineering Lens. Retrieved from: http://www.integratingengineering.org/index.html.
  80. Worth, K. (2010). Science in early childhood classrooms: Content and process. Collected Papers from the SEED (STEM in Early Education and Development) Conference. Retrieved from: http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/beyond/seed/worth.html.
  81. Wynn, T., & Harris, J. (2013). Toward a STEM and arts curriculum: Creating the teacher team. Art Education, 65, 42–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (2003). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mia Dubosarsky
    • 1
    Email author
  • Melissa Sue John
    • 1
  • Florencia Anggoro
    • 2
  • Susmitha Wunnava
    • 1
  • Ugur Celik
    • 1
  1. 1.Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI)WorcesterUSA
  2. 2.College of the Holy CrossWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations