Advertisement

Geo-Reconstruct Technology of Hull

  • Bao-Ji Zhang
  • Sheng-Long Zhang
Chapter
  • 298 Downloads

Abstract

The hull shape optimization based on the Michell integral method of the theory of linear wave resistance is based on the hull shape value contained in the wave resistance expression. Therefore, the hull shape value can be directly used as the design variable in the optimization process without the need to parameterize and reconstruct the hull geometry; Because of the implicit relationship between the objective function and the design variable, and the automatic deformation of the hull and the automatic demarcation of the mesh in the optimization process, the ship-type optimization based on Rankine source method and the CFD method requires the use of hull geometry reconstruction techniques to connect the objective function with the design variables.

Keywords

Rankine Source Method Hull Shape Hull Surface Control Vertices Nonuniform B-spline (NURBS) 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhao F, LI S-Z, Yang L (2010) An overview on the design optimization of ship hull based on CFD techniques. J Ship Mech 14(7): 406–412Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yusuke T, Sugimoto S, Shinya M (2003) Development of CAD/CFD/ optimizer-integrated hull-form design system. J Kansai Soc Naval Archit Jpn (240): 29–36Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu P, Zhang H, Cheng H (2014) An overview on hull form generations and geometric representation methods of surface naval ship. Ship Sci Technol 36(6): 1–6Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jochen M (2003) Use of CFD methods for hull form optimization in a model basin. In: MARNET—CFD workshop pp 1–8Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harries S (1998) Parametric design and hydrodynamic optimization of ship hull forms. Institut für Schiffs-und Meerestechnik, Technische Universit Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harries S (2005) Systematic optimization-a key for improving ship hydrodynamics. Hansa 142(12): 36–43Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abt C, Harries S (2007) FRIENDSHIP-Framework-integrating ship-design modeling simula-tion and optimization. Naval Archit RINA (1): 1–8Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abt, CT, Harries, S, Heimann J (1999) Formal hydrodynamic optimization of a fast monohull on the basis of parametric hull design. In: FAST’99-5th International conference on fast sea transportation, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abt C, Harries S, Heimann J, Winter H (2003) From redesign to optimal hull lines by means of parametric modeling. In: 2nd International conference on computer application and information technology in the maritime industries, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tahara Y, Patterson E, Stern F, Himeno Y (2000) Flow-and wave-field optimization of surface combatants using CFD-based optimization methods. Val de Reuil, France. In: Proceedings, 23rd ONR symposium on naval hydrodynamicsGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim H, Yang C, Chun HH (2010) A combined local and global hull form Modification approach for hydrodynamic optimization. In: 28th symposium on naval hydrodynamicsGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim H (2009) Multi-objective optimization for ship hull form design. America: George Mason UniversityGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peri D, Rossetti M, Campana EF (2001) Design optimization of ship hulls via CFD techniques. J Ship Res 45(2): 140–149Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ampana EF, Peri D, Bulgarelli UP (2002) Optimal shape design of a surface combatant with reduced wave pattern. In: Symposium on “Reduction of military vehicle acquisition time and cost through advanced modelling and virtual simulation”, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peri D, Campana EF (2003) Multidisciplinary design optimization of a naval surface combatant. J Ship Res 47(1):1–12Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peri D, Campana EF (2005) High-fidelity models and multi objective global optimization algorithms in simulation-based design. J Ship Res 49(3):159–175Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Campana EF, Peri D, Tahara Y, Stern F (2001) Comparison and validation of CFD based local optimization methods for surface combatant bow. In: Canada: The 25th symposium on naval hydrodynamicsGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tahara Y, Peri D, Campana EF, Stern F (2008) Computational fluid dynamics-based multi objective optimization of a surface combatant. Mar Sci Technol 13(2):95–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Campana EF, Peri D, Tahara Y, Kandasamy M, Stern F (2009) Numerical optimization methods for ship hydrodynamic design. In: SNAME annual meetingGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peri D, Campana EF (2006) Simulation based design of fast multihull ship. In: 26th symposium on naval hydrodynamics. Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Campana EF, Peri D (2006) Shape optimization in ship hydrodynamics using computational fluid dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196: 634–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tahara Y, Peri D, Campana EF, Stern F (2008) Single and multi objective design optimization of a fast multihull ship: Numerical and experimental results. In: 27th symposium on naval hydrodynamicsGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhou CJ (1992) Computer aided hull form design. Shang Hai: Shanghai Jiaotong University PressGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang P (2009) The parametric design to hull form. Wu Xi: Jiangnan UniversityGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ping Z, De-xiang Z, Wen-hao L (2008) Parametric approach to design of hull forms. J Hydrodyn Ser B 20(6):804–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xie Y-P, Liu Z, Zhang H (2009) Method of mould lines parameterized design of the round craft base on NAPA. Ship Eng 31(6): 8–11Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang BJ (2009) Research on optimization design of hull lines and minimum Resistance hull form. Dalian: Dalian University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bao-ji Z, Kun Ma, Zhuo-shang J (2009) The optimization study for hull form of minimum wave making resistance based on Rankine source method. J Hydrodyn Ser B 21(2):277–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang B-J, M K (2011) Study on hull form optimization for minimum resistance based on niche genetic algorithms. J Ship Prod Des 27(4): 162–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yu YY (2009) Study on the method of ship and platform 3D parametric general design. Dalian: Dalian University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fu H-P, Chen Z-G (2010) Stern form optimization aimed at wake uniformity. J Shanghai jiaotong Univ 44(10): 1430–1433Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Baiwei F, Zuyuan L, Chengsheng Z (2010) Parametrization modeling based on hull form morphing method. Comput Aided Eng 19(4):3–7Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Li SZ (2012) Research on hull form design optimization based on SBD technique. Wuxi: China Ship Scientific Research CenterGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mitsuhiro A, Tan O (1966) Application of wave resistance theory in ship type planning. Kansai Soc Nav Archit Jpn 119:60–72Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Suzuki K., Iokamori N (1999) Studies on minimization of wave making resistance based on Rankine source method. Kansai Soc Nav Archit Jpn (185): 9–19. (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yasukawa H, Heavy M (2000) Ship form improvement using genetic algorithm. Ship Technology Research 47, 35–44Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Takumi Y, Kazuo S (2001) Hydrodynamic shape optimization of bow bulbs based on rankine source method. Kansai Soc Nav Archit Jpn 325:39–47Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Saha GK, Suzuki K, Kai H (2004) Hydrodynamic optimization of ship hull forms in shallow water. J Marine Sci Technol 9(2):51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Saha GK, Suzuki K, Kai H (2005) Hydrodynamic optimization of a catamaran hull with large bow and stern bulbs installed on the center plane of the catamaran. J Marine Sci Technol 10:32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hirayama A, Ando J (2008) Study on mul-tiobjective hull optimization for resistance in still water and added resistance in waves-mul-tiobjective optimization using real-coded genetic algorithm. Jpn Soc Naval Archit Ocean Eng (7): 213–222Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jun-ichi H, Himeno Y, Tahara Y (1996) Hull form optimization by nonlinear programming (Part 4): Improvement of stern form for wake and viscous resistance. J Kansai Soc Naval Archit Jpn 225:15–21Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jun-ichi H, Himeno Y, Tahara Y (1996) Hull form optimization by nonlinear programming (Part 3): Improvement of stern form for wake and viscous resistance. J Kansai Soc Naval Archit Jpn (225): 1–6Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jun-ichi H, Himeno Y, Masatoshi B (1995) Hull form optimization by nonlinear programming: Part 2: improvement of hull form for minimizing wave resistance. J Kansai Soc Naval Archit Jpn 224:13–19Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Masuda S, Suzuki K, Kasahara Y (2002) An optimization method for full form ships using a simple prediction of the thrust deduction factor. J Kansai Soc Naval Archit Jpn 237:33–38Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Suzuki K, Kai H, Kashiwabara S (2005) Studies on the optimization of stern hull form based on a potential flow solver. J Marine Sci Technol 10(2):61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Xu G, Wang GZ, Chen X (2010) Free form deformation and its application. J Comput Res Dev 47(2): 344–352Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Deng ZJ, Cao J (2013) Research and application of FFD algorithm. Comput Technol Dev 23(12): 116–119Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Demengel P. Gilberd, DH et al (2000) Mathematics of curves and surfaces. Beijing: Commercial PressGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wu G-L, Zhang Q-J (2011) Study on computer aided NURBS surface modeling technology and its implementatio. J Jiangnan Univ (Natl Sci Edition 10(2): 158–161Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sun ZX, Song JJ, An YR (2010) Optimization of the head shape of the CRH3 high speed train. Sci China Technol Sci 53(12):3356–3364CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, Shanghai and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bao-Ji Zhang
    • 1
  • Sheng-Long Zhang
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Ocean Science and EngineeringShanghai Maritime UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Merchant Marine CollegeShanghai Maritime UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations