Skip to main content
  • 654 Accesses

Abstract

The hull shape optimization based on the Michell integral method of the theory of linear wave resistance is based on the hull shape value contained in the wave resistance expression. Therefore, the hull shape value can be directly used as the design variable in the optimization process without the need to parameterize and reconstruct the hull geometry; Because of the implicit relationship between the objective function and the design variable, and the automatic deformation of the hull and the automatic demarcation of the mesh in the optimization process, the ship-type optimization based on Rankine source method and the CFD method requires the use of hull geometry reconstruction techniques to connect the objective function with the design variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zhao F, LI S-Z, Yang L (2010) An overview on the design optimization of ship hull based on CFD techniques. J Ship Mech 14(7): 406–412

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yusuke T, Sugimoto S, Shinya M (2003) Development of CAD/CFD/ optimizer-integrated hull-form design system. J Kansai Soc Naval Archit Jpn (240): 29–36

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liu P, Zhang H, Cheng H (2014) An overview on hull form generations and geometric representation methods of surface naval ship. Ship Sci Technol 36(6): 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jochen M (2003) Use of CFD methods for hull form optimization in a model basin. In: MARNET—CFD workshop pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harries S (1998) Parametric design and hydrodynamic optimization of ship hull forms. Institut für Schiffs-und Meerestechnik, Technische Universit Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harries S (2005) Systematic optimization-a key for improving ship hydrodynamics. Hansa 142(12): 36–43

    Google Scholar 

  7. Abt C, Harries S (2007) FRIENDSHIP-Framework-integrating ship-design modeling simula-tion and optimization. Naval Archit RINA (1): 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  8. Abt, CT, Harries, S, Heimann J (1999) Formal hydrodynamic optimization of a fast monohull on the basis of parametric hull design. In: FAST’99-5th International conference on fast sea transportation, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  9. Abt C, Harries S, Heimann J, Winter H (2003) From redesign to optimal hull lines by means of parametric modeling. In: 2nd International conference on computer application and information technology in the maritime industries, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tahara Y, Patterson E, Stern F, Himeno Y (2000) Flow-and wave-field optimization of surface combatants using CFD-based optimization methods. Val de Reuil, France. In: Proceedings, 23rd ONR symposium on naval hydrodynamics

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim H, Yang C, Chun HH (2010) A combined local and global hull form Modification approach for hydrodynamic optimization. In: 28th symposium on naval hydrodynamics

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim H (2009) Multi-objective optimization for ship hull form design. America: George Mason University

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peri D, Rossetti M, Campana EF (2001) Design optimization of ship hulls via CFD techniques. J Ship Res 45(2): 140–149

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ampana EF, Peri D, Bulgarelli UP (2002) Optimal shape design of a surface combatant with reduced wave pattern. In: Symposium on “Reduction of military vehicle acquisition time and cost through advanced modelling and virtual simulation”, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peri D, Campana EF (2003) Multidisciplinary design optimization of a naval surface combatant. J Ship Res 47(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peri D, Campana EF (2005) High-fidelity models and multi objective global optimization algorithms in simulation-based design. J Ship Res 49(3):159–175

    Google Scholar 

  17. Campana EF, Peri D, Tahara Y, Stern F (2001) Comparison and validation of CFD based local optimization methods for surface combatant bow. In: Canada: The 25th symposium on naval hydrodynamics

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tahara Y, Peri D, Campana EF, Stern F (2008) Computational fluid dynamics-based multi objective optimization of a surface combatant. Mar Sci Technol 13(2):95–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Campana EF, Peri D, Tahara Y, Kandasamy M, Stern F (2009) Numerical optimization methods for ship hydrodynamic design. In: SNAME annual meeting

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peri D, Campana EF (2006) Simulation based design of fast multihull ship. In: 26th symposium on naval hydrodynamics. Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  21. Campana EF, Peri D (2006) Shape optimization in ship hydrodynamics using computational fluid dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196: 634–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tahara Y, Peri D, Campana EF, Stern F (2008) Single and multi objective design optimization of a fast multihull ship: Numerical and experimental results. In: 27th symposium on naval hydrodynamics

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou CJ (1992) Computer aided hull form design. Shang Hai: Shanghai Jiaotong University Press

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang P (2009) The parametric design to hull form. Wu Xi: Jiangnan University

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ping Z, De-xiang Z, Wen-hao L (2008) Parametric approach to design of hull forms. J Hydrodyn Ser B 20(6):804–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xie Y-P, Liu Z, Zhang H (2009) Method of mould lines parameterized design of the round craft base on NAPA. Ship Eng 31(6): 8–11

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang BJ (2009) Research on optimization design of hull lines and minimum Resistance hull form. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bao-ji Z, Kun Ma, Zhuo-shang J (2009) The optimization study for hull form of minimum wave making resistance based on Rankine source method. J Hydrodyn Ser B 21(2):277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang B-J, M K (2011) Study on hull form optimization for minimum resistance based on niche genetic algorithms. J Ship Prod Des 27(4): 162–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yu YY (2009) Study on the method of ship and platform 3D parametric general design. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fu H-P, Chen Z-G (2010) Stern form optimization aimed at wake uniformity. J Shanghai jiaotong Univ 44(10): 1430–1433

    Google Scholar 

  32. Baiwei F, Zuyuan L, Chengsheng Z (2010) Parametrization modeling based on hull form morphing method. Comput Aided Eng 19(4):3–7

    Google Scholar 

  33. Li SZ (2012) Research on hull form design optimization based on SBD technique. Wuxi: China Ship Scientific Research Center

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mitsuhiro A, Tan O (1966) Application of wave resistance theory in ship type planning. Kansai Soc Nav Archit Jpn 119:60–72

    Google Scholar 

  35. Suzuki K., Iokamori N (1999) Studies on minimization of wave making resistance based on Rankine source method. Kansai Soc Nav Archit Jpn (185): 9–19. (in Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yasukawa H, Heavy M (2000) Ship form improvement using genetic algorithm. Ship Technology Research 47, 35–44

    Google Scholar 

  37. Takumi Y, Kazuo S (2001) Hydrodynamic shape optimization of bow bulbs based on rankine source method. Kansai Soc Nav Archit Jpn 325:39–47

    Google Scholar 

  38. Saha GK, Suzuki K, Kai H (2004) Hydrodynamic optimization of ship hull forms in shallow water. J Marine Sci Technol 9(2):51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Saha GK, Suzuki K, Kai H (2005) Hydrodynamic optimization of a catamaran hull with large bow and stern bulbs installed on the center plane of the catamaran. J Marine Sci Technol 10:32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hirayama A, Ando J (2008) Study on mul-tiobjective hull optimization for resistance in still water and added resistance in waves-mul-tiobjective optimization using real-coded genetic algorithm. Jpn Soc Naval Archit Ocean Eng (7): 213–222

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jun-ichi H, Himeno Y, Tahara Y (1996) Hull form optimization by nonlinear programming (Part 4): Improvement of stern form for wake and viscous resistance. J Kansai Soc Naval Archit Jpn 225:15–21

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jun-ichi H, Himeno Y, Tahara Y (1996) Hull form optimization by nonlinear programming (Part 3): Improvement of stern form for wake and viscous resistance. J Kansai Soc Naval Archit Jpn (225): 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jun-ichi H, Himeno Y, Masatoshi B (1995) Hull form optimization by nonlinear programming: Part 2: improvement of hull form for minimizing wave resistance. J Kansai Soc Naval Archit Jpn 224:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  44. Masuda S, Suzuki K, Kasahara Y (2002) An optimization method for full form ships using a simple prediction of the thrust deduction factor. J Kansai Soc Naval Archit Jpn 237:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  45. Suzuki K, Kai H, Kashiwabara S (2005) Studies on the optimization of stern hull form based on a potential flow solver. J Marine Sci Technol 10(2):61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Xu G, Wang GZ, Chen X (2010) Free form deformation and its application. J Comput Res Dev 47(2): 344–352

    Google Scholar 

  47. Deng ZJ, Cao J (2013) Research and application of FFD algorithm. Comput Technol Dev 23(12): 116–119

    Google Scholar 

  48. Demengel P. Gilberd, DH et al (2000) Mathematics of curves and surfaces. Beijing: Commercial Press

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wu G-L, Zhang Q-J (2011) Study on computer aided NURBS surface modeling technology and its implementatio. J Jiangnan Univ (Natl Sci Edition 10(2): 158–161

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sun ZX, Song JJ, An YR (2010) Optimization of the head shape of the CRH3 high speed train. Sci China Technol Sci 53(12):3356–3364

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, Shanghai and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhang, BJ., Zhang, SL. (2019). Geo-Reconstruct Technology of Hull. In: Research on Ship Design and Optimization Based on Simulation-Based Design (SBD) Technique. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8423-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8423-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8422-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8423-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics