Advertisement

Basic Theory of Hydrodynamics

  • Bao-Ji Zhang
  • Sheng-Long Zhang
Chapter
  • 303 Downloads

Abstract

Ship hydrodynamic performance evaluation technique is one of the prerequisites and key conditions for ship-type optimization based on SBD technology, which provides an effective means to establish the mathematical model of ship design optimization problem. The accuracy of the hydrodynamic performance evaluation directly affects the quality of the optimization results [1]. In the optimization process, the optimization algorithm will adjust the next search direction based on the performance prediction results. Therefore, the reliability of the performance prediction results is the key to ensure that the search direction of the optimization algorithm in the design space is correct or not, and is also directly related to the success or failure of the optimization design.

Keywords

Performance Prediction Results Rankine Source Method Free Surface Grid Wave-making Resistance Hull Surface 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Campana EF, Peri D, Tahara Y et al (2009) Numerical optimization methods for ship hydrodynamic design. In: SNAME annual meetingGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li GL, Luohuai L, Tan ZS (1990) Energy-saving ship design. Beijing: National Defense Industry PressGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li ZZ (2005) Research on ship type optimization based on wave resistance value calculation. Dalian University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tarafdera MS, Suzuki K (2008) Numerical calculation of free-surface potential flow around a ship using the modified Rankine source panel method. Ocean Eng 35(5–6):536–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ji X, Zang YL, Cheng YM (1997) Boundary element method progress and general procedure. Shanghai: Tongji University PressGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu YZ (2003) Theory of ship wave making resisitance. BeiJing: National Defense Industry Press, 1Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gao B (2002) Wave resistance calculation and ship type optimization. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University2002Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li LY (2006) Numerical simulation of resistance and viscous flow around ship hull. Dalian Polytechnic UniversityGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    STAR-CCM users guideGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Choi J, Sung BY (2009) Numerical simulations using momentum source wave-maker applied to RANS equation model. Coastal Eng 56(10):1043–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Longo J, Stern F (2005) Uncertainty assessment for towing tank tests with example for surface combatant DTMB model 5415. J Ship Res 49(1):55–68Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gui L, Longo J, Stern F (2005) Biases of PIV measurement of turbulent flow and the masked correlation-based interrogation. Exp Fluids 30:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang C-L, ZHU R-C, Miao G-P (2012) Uncertainty analysis in CFD for flow simulation around ship using RANS and DES. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ 46(3): 430–435Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, Shanghai and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bao-Ji Zhang
    • 1
  • Sheng-Long Zhang
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Ocean Science and EngineeringShanghai Maritime UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Merchant Marine CollegeShanghai Maritime UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations