Advertisement

Improvement of Yeast Fermentation Efficiency Utilizing mRNAs Preferentially Translated Under Translational Repression

  • Sae Kato
  • Shingo Izawa
Chapter

Abstract

As their transcription site (nucleus) and translation site (cytoplasm) are separated by the nuclear membrane, eukaryotic microorganisms such as yeast and Aspergillus undergo gene expression regulation differently from prokaryotic microorganisms such as Escherichia coli. In eukaryotic microorganisms, mRNAs synthesized in the nucleus are transported outside after intranuclear processing, which includes addition of 5′ caps and 3′ poly(A) tails, splicing, and formation of nuclear export complexes. Additionally, mRNA nuclear export also occurs selectively under certain stress conditions, and this allows efficient gene expression by retaining nonessential mRNAs in the nucleus while preferentially transporting urgent and highly essential mRNAs to the cytoplasm. Recently, it has lately been proven that specific mRNAs are preferentially and selectively translated under stress conditions that repress overall protein synthesis. These facts suggest that, in addition to transcription regulation, gene expression is also precisely regulated at the mRNA nuclear transport stage and cytoplasmic translation stage. This paper focuses on the preferential and selective translation in yeast cells under stress and introduces recent findings regarding applications of this knowledge.

Keywords

Translation repression Preferential translation Ethanol stress Lignocellulosic hydrolysates Vanillin 

References

  1. Akao T, Yashiro I, Hosoyama A, Kitagaki H, Horikawa H, Watanabe D et al (2011) Whole-genome sequencing of sake yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Kyokai no. 7. DNA Res 18:423–434.  https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsr029 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson P, Kedersha N (2006) RNA granules. J Cell Biol 172:803–808.  https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200512082 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Antal MJ, Mok WS, Richards GN (1990) Mechanism of formation of 5-(hydroxymethyl)-2-furaldehyde from d-fructose and sucrose. Carbohydr Res 199:91–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arribere JA, Doudna JA, Gilbert WV (2011) Reconsidering movement of eukaryotic mRNAs between polysomes and P bodies. Mol Cell 44:745–758.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.09.019 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashe MP, De Long SK, Sachs AB (2000) Glucose depletion rapidly inhibits translation initiation in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 11:833–848.  https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.11.3.833 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Balagopal V, Parker R (2009) Polysomes, P bodies and stress granules: states and fates of eukaryotic mRNAs. Curr Opin Cell Biol 21:403–408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2009.03.005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Brengues M, Sheth U, Parker R (2005) Movement of eukaryotic mRNAs between polysomes and cytoplasmic processing bodies. Science 310:486–489.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1115791 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchan JR, Muhlrad D, Parker R (2008) P bodies promote stress granule assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 183:441–455.  https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200807043 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Chattopadhyay S, Pearce DA (2002) Interaction with Btn2p is required for localization of Rsglp: Btn2p-mediated changes in arginine uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 1:606–612.  https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.1.4.606-612.2002 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Chattopadhyay S, Muzaffar NE, Sherman F, Pearce DA (2000) The yeast model for Batten disease: mutations in btn1, btn2, and hsp30 alter pH homeostasis. J Bacteriol 182:6418–6423.  https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.182.22.6418-6423.2000 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Espinazo-Romeu M, Cantoral JM, Matallana E, Aranda A (2008) Btn2p is involved in ethanol tolerance and biofilm formation in flor yeast. FEMS Yeast Res 8:1127–1136.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00397.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. González E, Fernández MR, Marco D, Calam E, Sumoy L, Parés X, Dequin S, Biosca JA (2010) Role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae oxidoreductases Bdh1p and Ara1p in the metabolism of acetoin and 2,3-butanediol. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:670–679.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01521-09 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Grousl T, Ivanov P, Frýdlova I, Vasicová P, Janda F, Vojtová J, Malinská K, Malcová I, Nováková L, Janosková D, Valásek L, Hasek J (2009) Robust heat shock induces eIF2alpha-phosphorylation-independent assembly of stress granules containing eIF3 and 40S ribosomal subunits in budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Sci 122:2078–2088.  https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200807043 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hajar S, Azhar M, Abdulla R, Jambo SA, Marbawi H, Gansau JA, Faik AAM, Rodrigues KF (2017) Yeasts in sustainable bioethanol production: a review. Biochem Biophys Rep 10:52–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Inada T, Aiba H (2005) Translation of aberrant mRNAs lacking a termination codon or with a shortened 3’-UTR is repressed after initiation in yeast. EMBO J 24:1584–1595.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600636 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Ishida Y, Nguyen TTM, Kitajima S, Izawa S (2016) Prioritized expression of BDH2 under bulk translational repression and its contribution to tolerance to severe vanillin stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Front Microbiol 7:1059.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01059 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Ishida Y, Nguyen TTM, Izawa S (2017) The yeast ADH7 promoter enables gene expression under pronounced translation repression caused by the combined stress of vanillin, furfural, and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. J Biotechnol 252:65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.04.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Iwaki A, Kawai T, Yamamoto Y, Izawa S (2013a) Biomass conversion inhibitors, furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, induce the formation of mRNP granules and attenuate translation activity in yeast. Appl Environ Microbiol 446:225–233.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02797-12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iwaki A, Ohnuki S, Suga Y, Izawa S, Ohya Y (2013b) Vanillin inhibits translation and induces messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) granule formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: application and validation of high-content, image-based profiling. PLoS One 8:e61748.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061748 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Izawa S, Kita T, Ikeda K, Miki T, Inoue Y (2007) Formation of the cytoplasmic P-bodies in sake yeast during Japanese sake brewing and wine making. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 71:2800–2807.  https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.70417 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kama R, Robinson M, Gerst JE (2007) Btn2, a hook1 ortholog and potential batten disease-related protein, mediates late endosome-Golgi protein sorting in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 27:605–621.  https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00699-06 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kato K, Yamamoto Y, Izawa S (2011) Severe ethanol stress induces assembly of stress granules in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 28:339–347.  https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.1842 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kato S, Yamauchi Y, Izawa S (2018) Pronounced translation repression and the preferential expression of BTN2 in yeast during the process of alcoholic fermentation and wine making (submitted)Google Scholar
  24. Kedersha N, Stoecklin G, Ayodele M, Yacono P, Lykke-Anderson J, Fritzler MJ, Scheuner D, Kaufman RJ, Golan DE, Anderson P (2005) Stress granules and processing bodies are dynamically linked sites of mRNP remodeling. J Cell Biol 169:871–884.  https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200502088 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim Y, Chattopadhyay S, Locke S, Pearce DA (2005) Interaction among Btn1p, Btn2p, and Ist2p reveals potential interplay among the vacuole, amino acid levels, and ion homeostasis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 4:281–288.  https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.4.2.281-288.2005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Klinke HB, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK (2004) Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66:10–26.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1642-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lam FH, Ghaderi A, Fink GR, Stephanopoulos G (2014) Engineering alcohol tolerance in yeast. Science 346:71–75.  https://doi.org/10.1126/scicence.1257859 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Larroy C, Fernández MR, González E, Parés X, Biosca JA (2002a) Characterization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae YMR318C (ADH6) gene product as a broad specificity NADPH-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase: relevance in aldehyde reduction. Biochem J 361:163–172.  https://doi.org/10.1042/0264-6021:3610163 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Larroy C, Parés X, Biosca JA (2002b) Characterization of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae NADP(H)-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase (ADHVII), a member of the cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase family. Eur J Biochem 269:5738–5745.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03296.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lu X, Yamauchi K, Phaiboonsilpa N, Saka S (2009) Two-step hydrolysis of Japanese beech as treated by semi-flow hot-compressed water. J Wood Sci 55:367–375.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-009-1040-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lui J, Campbell SG, Ashe MP (2010) Inhibition of translation following glucose depletion in yeast facilitates a rationalization of mRNA content. Biochem Soc Trans 38:1131–1136.  https://doi.org/10.1042/BST0381131 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Marsit S, Dequin S (2015) Diversity and adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces wine yeast: a review. FEMS Yeast Res 15:fov067.  https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/fov067 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller SBM, Ho C, Winkler J, Khokhrina M, Neuner A, Mohamed MYH, Guilbride DL, Richiter K, Lisby M, Schiebel E, Mogk A, Bukau B (2015) Compartment-specific aggregases direct distinct nuclear and cytoplasmic aggregate deposition. EMBO J 34:778–797.  https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201489524 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Nguyen TTM, Kitajima S, Izawa S (2014) Importance of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) for vanillin tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng 118:263–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.02.025 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Nguyen TTM, Iwaki A, Izawa S (2015) The ADH7 promoter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is vanillin inducible and enables mRNA translation under severe vanillin stress. Front Microbiol 6:1390.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01390 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Nguyen TTM, Ishida Y, Kato S, Iwaki A, Izawa S (2018) The VFH1 (YLL056C) promoter is vanillin-inducible and enables mRNA translation despite pronounced translation repression caused by severe vanillin stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (submitted)Google Scholar
  37. Noguchi C, Watanabe D, Zhou Y, Akao T, Shimoi H (2012) Association of constitutive hyperphosphorylation of Hsf1p with a defective ethanol stress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae sake yeast strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:385–392.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.06341-11 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Nordling E, Jörnvall H, Persson B (2002) Medium-chain dehydrogenases/reductases (MDR) family characterizations including genome comparisons and active site modeling. Eur J Biochem 269:4267–4276.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03114 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Piotrowski JS, Zhang Y, Bates DM, Keating DH, Sato TK, Ong IM, Landick R (2014) Death by a thousand cuts: the challenges and diverse landscape of lignocellulosic hydrolysate inhibitors. Front Microbiol 5:90.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00090 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Sopko R, Huang D, Preston N, Chua G, Papp B, Kafadar K, Snyder M, Oliver SG, Cyert M, Hughes TR, Boone C, Andrews B (2006) Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. Mol Cell 21:319–330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.12.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Teixeira MC, Gosinho CP, Cabrito TR, Mira NP, Sá-Correia I (2012) Increased expression of the yeast multidrug resistance ABC transporter Pdr18 leads to increased ethanol tolerance and ethanol production in high gravity alcoholic fermentation. Microb Cell Fact 11:98.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-11-98 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Vera M, Pani B, Griffiths LA, Muchardt C, Abbott CM, Singer RH, Nudler E (2014) The translation elongation factor eEF1A1 couples transcription to translation during heat shock response. eLife 3:e03164.  https://doi.org/10.75554/eLife.03164 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Wu H, Zheng X, Araki Y, Sahara H, Takagi H, Shimoi H (2006) Global gene expression analysis of yeast cells during sake brewing. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:7353–7358.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01097-06 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Yamamoto Y, Izawa S (2013) Adaptive response in stress granule formation and bulk translational repression upon a combined stress of mild heat shock and mild ethanol stress in yeast. Genes Cells 18:974–984.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gtc.12090 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Yamauchi Y, Izawa S (2016) Prioritized expression of BTN2 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under pronounced translation repression induced by severe ethanol stress. Front Microbiol 7:1319.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01319 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Yang J, Bae JY, Lee YM, Kwon H, Moon HY, Kang HA, Yee SB, Kim W, Choi W (2011) Construction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with enhanced ethanol tolerance by mutagenesis of the TATA-binding protein gene and identification of novel genes associated with ethanol tolerance. Biotechnol Bioeng 108:1776–1787.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.23141 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Zid BM, O’Shea EK (2014) Promoter sequences direct cytoplasmic localization and translation of mRNAs during starvation in yeast. Nature 514:117–121.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13578 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied BiologyKyoto Institute of TechnologyMatsugasaki, Sakyo-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations