Study on Properties of LBW Joint of AISI 304 Pipes Used in Nuclear Power Plant

  • Jingyao Chen
  • Xiao Wei
  • Jijin Xu
  • Yi Duan
  • Junmei Chen
  • Chun Yu
  • Hao Lu
Conference paper
Part of the Transactions on Intelligent Welding Manufacturing book series (TRINWM)


In this work, a girth weld of AISI 304 stainless steel pipes with a dimension of Φ89 mm × 250 mm × 14.5 mm was produced by laser beam welding. The microstructure was observed by optical microscopy. The microhardness test was carried out to study the mechanical properties of the welded joint. A slow strain rate test was performed to investigate the susceptibility to stress corrosion cracking (SCC) of the welded joint in the simulated pressurized water reactor environment. The results show that the values of microhardness in the weld and HAZ are close to those in the parent material. According to ultimate tensile strength-loss rate, elongation-loss rate and fractograph analysis, the welded joint has low susceptibility to SCC in the simulated pressurized water reactor environment.


Laser beam welding Slow strain rate test SCC susceptibility Microhardness AISI 304 stainless steel 


  1. 1.
    Subodh K, Shahi AS (2011) Effect of heat input on the microstructure and mechanical properties of gas tungsten arc welded AISI 304 stainless steel joints. Mater Des 32:3617–3623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee HT, Jeng SL (2001) Characteristics of dissimilar welding of alloy 690 to 304L stainless steel. Sci Technol Weld Joining 6:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jamshidi AH, Farzadi A, Serajzadeh S et al (2009) Theoretical and experimental study of microstructures and weld pool geometry during GTAW of 304 stainless steel. Int J Adv Manufact Technol 42:1043–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wolfgang R, Mary PN, George SG (2011) Civilian nuclear accidents. Encycl Inorg Bioinorg Chem 15:1–14Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jinya K (2007) Crack growth analysis of SCC under various residual stress distributions near the piping butt-welding. In: ASME Pressure vessels and piping division conference, vol 1, pp 22–26Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scott PM (2007) An overview of materials degradation by stress corrosion in PWRs. Eur Fed Corros Publ 1:3–24Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Takumi T, Katsuhiko F, Koji A (2005) Microstructural characterization of SCC crack tip and oxide film for SUS 316 stainless steel in simulated PWR primary water at 320 ℃. J Nucl Sci Technol 42:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    MacDonald DD, Urquidi-MacDonald M (1991) A coupled environment model for stress corrosion cracking in sensitized type 304 stainless steel in LWR environments. Corros Sci 32:51–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xu JJ, Chen JY, Duan Y et al (2017) Comparison of residual stress induced by TIG and LBW in girth weld of AISI 304 stainless steel pipes. J Mater Process Technol 248:178–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Muthupandi V, Bala SP, Seshadri SK et al (2003) Effect of weld metal chemistry and heat input on the structure and properties of duplex stainless-steel welds. Mater Sci Eng A 358:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Lab of Shanghai Laser Manufacturing and Materials Modification, School of Materials Science and EngineeringShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations