Software Defined Networking for Smart Grid Communications and Security Challenges

  • M. U. Shaileshwari
  • K. S. Nandini Prasad
  • A. Paventhan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 487)


With the aim of empowering smarter energy usage and integration of renewable distributed energy resources (DERs), smart grid has been proposed as an evolution of the current power systems leveraging the most advanced information and communication technologies (ICTs) to provide an intelligent bi-directional electricity and communication network. Smart grid is a large-scale, heterogeneous, and distributed network, which poses many challenges to be overcome from communication networking to autonomous control and management. In recent years, the paradigm of software defined networking (SDN) has attracted much attention. It proposes a new concept of networking architecture which abstracts the control functionalities from the packet forwarding hardware (data plane) to an external software controller (control plane). This is extremely convenient for large data centers to cope with virtual machine networking in which virtual machines are created dynamically and move between different physical machines. Due to the controller being implemented as software and its programmatic interfaces to individual networking devices are exposed to other software applications, any network applications and services based on such an architecture can be more agile. Furthermore, application systems are enabled to be network-aware, which means that they are aware of the properties, requirements, and state of the network environment and can quickly adapt to changes in the network context. Therefore, SDN is perceived to have tremendous potential for utilization by the underlying communication infrastructure of the smart grid. With the advent of SDN, the interface between applications and networks will be greatly changed. Applications in smart grid will have a higher degree of network awareness which enables more dynamic interactions with the underlying network. In this paper, the challenges and security concerns are presented to explore the opportunities for SDN technology in smart grid communication.


Smart grid Software defined networking Cyber security Cyber-physical system 



Authors gratefully acknowledge the Central Power Research Institute, Bangalore, Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Technology, Bangalore, and ERNET India, Bangalore, for technical support provided by them.


  1. 1.
    Bonneau M. ICT’s role in sustainability, the case of smart grids: potential and challenges Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guidelines for Smart Grid cyber security, vol 2. Privacy and the Smart Grid, NIST, August 2010Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dorsch N, Kurtz F, Georg H, H¨agerling C, Wietfeld C. Software-defined networking for smart grid communications: applications, challenges and advantages. TU Dortmund University, Communication Networks Institute (CNI), GermanyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang J, Seet BC, Lie TT. Opportunities for software-defined networking in smart grid. Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Open Networking Foundation.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Aydeger A. Software defined networking for smart grid communications. Florida Interation University, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alam F, Katib I, Alzahrani AS. New networking era: software defined networking. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci Softw Eng. Computer Science Department, Faculty of Computing & IT Kind Abdulaziz University Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cahn A, Hoyos J, Hulse M, Keller E. Software-defined energy communication networks: from substation automation to future smart grids. University of Colorado, Boulder. In: IEEE SmartGridComm 2013 symposium—smart grid services and management modelsGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sequeira A. Report by Fundamentals of SDN Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. U. Shaileshwari
    • 1
  • K. S. Nandini Prasad
    • 2
  • A. Paventhan
    • 3
  1. 1.Utility Automation Research Centre, Central Power Research Institute (CPRI)BangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of ISEDr. Ambedkar Institute of TechnologyBangaloreIndia
  3. 3.Centre Head (Bangalore & Chennai), ERNET IndiaBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations