Advertisement

A Universal Basic Robot

  • Mathew Schwartz
  • Michael Ehrlich
Chapter
Part of the KAIST Research Series book series (KAISTRS)

Abstract

While the idea of advancing technology and society are often of primary interest to academics, the general public is frequently challenging the integration of these advancements within society. This complex issue is most often discussed around the role of robots in manufacturing where both repetitive and dangerous tasks performed by humans are being replaced by robotic counterparts that in many cases, can also perform these tasks more accurately. Similarly, the idea of automation through artificial intelligence poses a risk to workers far beyond physical labor, a topic highly discussed for the past few years. From this concern, theories on bringing your own robot to work, analogous to the bring your own device to work movement, have been brought up as a way into the future. Separately, in order to offset the economic downsides of the changing human labor force, and among other reasons, recent political discussions have been actively pursuing the idea of a universal basic income. This paper poses an alternative idea, one in which the advantages of robotics continues to benefit the laborers in which it replaces, and takes the bring your own robot to work to a macro scale: a universal basic robot. These two past proposals, one in which people bring their own robot to work, and one in which a universal basic income is given, have large differences in the way society itself will transform. This paper discusses the trends of technological development that lead to the robotic workforce and the economic challenges of implementing such an idea.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ji-Hyun Lee for organizing the Cultural DNA Workshop and the attendees for their valuable feedback during the conceptualization of this idea.

References

  1. 1.
    Prassler, Erwin, Ritter, Arno, Schaeffer, Christoph, & Fiorini, Paolo. (2000). A short history of cleaning robots. Autonomous Robots, 9(3), 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rumberger, R. W. (1984). High technology and job loss. Technology in Society, 6(4), 263–284.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Errington, F., Fujikura, T., & Gewertz, D. (2013). The noodle narratives: The global rise of an industrial food into the twenty-first century. Univ of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Collier, D. A. (1983). The service sector revolution: The automation of services. Long Range Planning, 16(6), 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leontief, W. W. (1982). The distribution of work and income. Scientific American, 247(3), 188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Parijs, Philippe. (2013). The universal basic income: Why utopian thinking matters, and how sociologists can contribute to it. Politics & Society, 41(2), 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Freedman, D. H. (2016). Basic income: A sellout of the American dream. Technology Review, 119(4), 48–53.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Quadagno, J. (1990). Race, class, and gender in the us welfare state: Nixon’s failed family assistance plan. American Sociological Review, 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tabatabai, H. (2012). From price subsidies to basic income: The iran model and its lessons. Exporting the Alaska Model: Adapting the Permanent Fund Dividend for Reform around the World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koistinen, Pertti, & Perkiö, Johanna. (2014). Good and bad times of social innovations: The case of universal basic income in finland. Basic Income Studies, 9(1–2), 25–57.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hall, Anthony. (2008). Brazil’s bolsa família: A double-edged sword? Development and Change, 39(5), 799–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aizenman, J. & Glick, R. (2007). Sovereign wealth funds: Stumbling blocks or stepping stones to financial globalization? CPBS 2007 Annual Report, pp. 11.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lam, W.W.-L. (2015). Chinese politics in the era of Xi Jinping: Renaissance, reform, or retrogression? Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, Y. & R. H. Gordon (2005). Tax structure and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5), 1027–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Greenwood, J., Hercowitz, Z., & Krusell, P. (1997). Long-run implications of investment-specific technological change. The American Economic Review, 342–362.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2017). Industry output and employment projections. Bureau of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leontief, W. & Duchin, F. (1984). The impacts of automation on employment, 1963–2000. Final report.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2017). Occupational outlook handbook: Drafters. Bureau of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Adams, B., Breazeal, C., Brooks, R. A., & Scassellati, B. (2000). Humanoid robots: A new kind of tool. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 15(4), 25–31.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schwartz, M. & Park, J. (2017). Robotic control strategies applicable to architectural design. Technology| Architecture + Design, 1(1), 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kawamura, K., Wilkes, D. M., Pack, T., Bishay, M., & Barile, J. (1996). Humanoids: Future robots for home and factory. In International Symposium on Humanoid Robots, pp. 53–62.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim, S., Kim, M., Lee, J., Hwang, S., Chae, J., Park, B., Cho, H., Sim, J., Jung, J., Lee, H. et al. (2015). Approach of team SNU to the DARPA robotics challenge finals. In 2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids) (pp. 777–784). IEEE.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rise of the robots: 60,000 workers culled from just one factory as chinas struggling electronics hub turns to artificial intelligence. Retrieved November 29, 2017 from http://www.scmp.com/news/china/economy/article/1949918/rise-robots-60000-workers-culled-just-one-factory-chinas.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Architecture and DesignNew Jersey Institute of TechnologyNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Martin Tuchman School Of ManagementNew Jersey Institute of TechnologyNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations