Abstract
This chapter analyzes research and capacity gaps in policies, institutions and markets in Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain (Eastern IGP), including the states of Bihar and West Bengal in India, Nepal and Bangladesh. The analysis is based on a review of existing policies, institutional framework and farmers group discussion (FGD) from selected villages in identified districts located across the Eastern IGP. A review of the existing policies and institutions indicated that a good number of required policies and institutional framework were in place, but the informal transaction cost of availing benefits of those policies by the smallholders from formal channels (banks, government departments, insurance companies, etc.) was very high. This reflected poorly on the level of governance, as the global percentile ranking of Eastern IGP states in respect of governance was in the range of 15–45%. Therefore, major reforms are required for promoting equitable access to technology and financial services; public resources management (reducing leakages) and addressing gender issues.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Institute for Integrated Development Studies (IIDS), Nepal; Bangladesh Centre for Advance Studies (BCAS), Bangladesh; Indian Council of Agricultural research, Eastern Region (ICAR-ER), Bihar; Uttar Banga Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, West Bengal.
- 2.
Makhanas are popularly known as lotus seeds, fox nuts, Euryale ferox, gorgon nuts and phool makhana.
References
Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies (BCAS). (2013). Analysis of research gaps in policies. Institutions and market opportunities for climate resilient farming system intensification in Bangladesh. FGD Findings Based Report. Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Bansil, P. (2011). Bihar agriculture: A perspective (1st ed.). New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company Private Ltd.
Boserup, E. (1993). The conditions of agricultural growth: The economics of Agrarian change under population pressure. London: Earthsca.
Carswell, G. (1997). Agricultural intensification and rural sustainable livelihoods: A think piece. IDS working paper 64. www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/Wp64.pdf.
Clarke, D. J., Mahul, O., Rao, K. N., Verma, N. (2012). Weather based crop insurance in India Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank. www.elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.
Collins, E. D., & Chandrasekaran, K. (2012). A wolf in sheep’s clothing? An analysis of the ‘sustainable intensification’ of agriculture. Amsterdam: Friends of the Earth International.
Collins, K. (2011). Land use (in) efficiency: Economics and outlook for Asia and the Pacific, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific Bangkok. http://www.unep.org/roap/Portals/96/REEO_AP_CH5_Land.pdf.
Dorward, A., Fan, S., Kydd, J., Lofgren, H., Morrison, J., Poulton, C., et al. (2004). Institutions and policies for pro-poor agricultural growth. Development Policy Review, 22(6), 611–622.
Edwards, C. A., Lal, R., Madden, P., Miller, R. H., & House, G. (Eds.). (1990). Sustainable agricultural systems. Ankeny (Iowa, USA): Soil and Water Conservation Society.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2009). Feeding the world, eradicating hunger. Rome, Italy: Background Document for World Summit on Food Security-INF/2. www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=13378&page=16.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2011). Save and grow: A policy maker’s guide to the sustainable intensification of crop production (p. 116). Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization. http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2215e/i2215e.pdf. Accessed December 2013.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2014). Farming systems and poverty. www.fao.org/farmingsystems/description_en.htm.
Garnett, T, Charles, H., & Godfray, J. (2012). Sustainable intensification in agriculture: Navigating a course through competing food system priorities. In Food climate research network and the Oxford Martin programme on the future of food. UK: University of Oxford.
GoB - Department of Finance. (2014). Economic survey of Bihar 2013–14. Patna: Government of Bihar.
GoBD - Ministry of Agriculture and FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization. (2011). Towards a food secure Bangladesh: Country programming framework 2010–15. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Government of Peoples Republic of Bangladesh.
GoBD - Ministry of Planning. (2011). Agricultural census of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Dhaka: Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
GoBD - Ministry of Planning. (2014). Yearbook of agricultural statistics—2012, 24th series (Chap. 8). Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Dhaka: Government of Peoples Republic of Bangladesh, pp. 255–266.
GoI - Ministry of Agriculture. (2013). State of Indian agriculture 2012–13. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Government of India. New Delhi, India.
GoI - Planning Commission. (2010). West Bengal development report. New Delhi: Government of India.
GoI - Planning Commission. (2012). Poverty estimates for 2009–10. India: Press Information Bureau, Government of India, March 19, 2012.
GoI - Special Task Force Agriculture (STFA). (2008). Bihar’s agriculture development: Opportunities and challenges-task force report. New Delhi: Government of India.
GoN - Ministry of Agricultural Development. (2012). Statistical information on Nepalese agriculture 2011/2012. Kathmandu: Agri-Business Promotion and Statistics Division, Government of Nepal.
GoN - National Planning Commission. (2014). Nepal human development report 2014. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal. http://www.npc.gov.np/new/uploadedFiles/allFiles/NHDR_Report_2014.pdf. Last accessed December 18, 2018.
GoWB - Department of Finance. (2012). Economic review of West Bengal, Government of West Bengal, Kolkata. http://www.wbfin.nic.in/writereaddata/EconomicReview11_Part2.pdf. Last accessed December 16, 2018.
GoWB - Department of Planning and Statistics. (2012). Statistical handbook. Kolkata: Government of West Bengal.
Institute for Integrated Development Studies (IIDS). (2013). Policy and institutions related research gaps for climate resilient farming system intensification in Nepal. Kathmandu: Nepal.
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). (2013). Research gaps in policies and institutions for climate resilient farming systems intensification: A diagnostic study in Eastern Indo-Gangetic plains (Draft Report). New Delhi: IFPRI South Asia Regional Office.
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). (2006). Nepal country strategic opportunities programme report for review (Document No. EB 2006/89/R.14/Rev.1). Rome: Executive Board—Eighty-Ninth Session.
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). (2012). Progress report on implementation of the performance-based allocation system. https://webapps.ifad.org/members/gc/35/docs/GC-35-L-10.pdf.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate change (IPCC). (2007). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. In: R. K. Pachauri & A. Reisinger (Eds.), Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (104 p). Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Draft Policy Research Working Paper. www.govindica-tors.org.
Mandemaker, M., Bakker, M., & Stoorvogel, J. (2011). The role of governance in agricultural expansion and intensification: A global study of arable agriculture. Ecology and Society, 16(2), 8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art8/;http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04142-160208.
National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS). (2013). Water use potential of flood-affected and drought prone areas of Eastern India (NAAS Policy Paper 60, p. 20). New Delhi.
Pingali, P., Bigot, Y., & Binswanger, H. P. (1987). Agricultural mechanization and the evolution of farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Poppy, G. M., Jepson, P. C., Pickett, J. A., & Birkett, M. A. (2014). Achieving food and environmental security: New approaches to close the gap. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20120272. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0272.
Pretty, J. (1997). The sustainable intensification of agriculture. Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 21(4), 247–256.
Reardon, T., & Kelly, V. (1999). Policy reforms and sustainable agricultural intensification in Africa. Development Policy Review, 17, 375–395.
Rota, A., & Sperandini, S. (2014). Value chains, linking producers to the markets: Thematic paper on livestock, international fund for agricultural development, Rome, Italy. www.ifad.org/lrkm/index.htm. Accessed on June 29, 2014.
Sehgal, V. K., Singh, M. R., Chaudhary, A., Jain, N., & Pathak, H. (2013). Vulnerability of agriculture to climate change: District level assessment in the Indo-Gangetic plains (p. 74). New Delhi: Indian Agricultural Research Institute.
Seth, A. (2009). Institutions and rural services: Lessons from IFAD-supported projects in Asia. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). http://www.ifad.org/operations/projects/regions/pi/paper/9.pdf.
Spielman, D. J. (2014). Evaluating the “new agronomy”, in global food policy report. Washington, D.C.: International food Policy Research Institute.
Thomas, T. S., Mainuddin, K., Cathy, C., Rahman, A., Haque, A., Islam, N., et al. (2012). Agriculture and adaptation in Bangladesh: Current and projected impacts of climate change—A report for USAID. ftp://cgiar.org/ifpri/LDanessi/USAID-Reports/.
The Montpellier Panel. (2013). Sustainable intensification: A new paradigm for African agriculture. London: Agriculture for Impact.
Tiffen, M., Mortimore, M., & Gichuki, F. (1994). More people, less erosion: Environmental recovery in Kenya. Chichester: Wiley and Sons.
Tyagi, N. K., Joshi, P. K., Aggarwal, P. K., & Pandey, D. (2013). Impact of government policies, programs on climate change adaptation, mitigation, and resilience in agriculture in South Asia. Paper presented in CCAFS Workshop on Institutions and policies for scaling-up climate-smart agriculture, December 2–5, 2013, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
United Nations (UN). (2009). The Millennium development goals report. http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/MDG_Report_2009_ENG.pdf.
United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (2013). Human development report 2013, the rise of the South: Human progress in a diverse world. New York, NY.
United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (2009). Policy study on the probable impacts of climate change on poverty and economic growth and the options of coping with adverse effect of climate change in Bangladesh.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2011). Resource efficiency: Economics and outlook for Asia and the Pacific. Thailand: Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific United Nations Environment Programme Bangkok.
United Nations. (2013). UN data 2012, 2013. United Nations Statistics Division. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/energy/edbase.htm.
United States Agency for International development (USAID). (2009). Best (Bellmon Estimation Studies for Title II) Analysis Bangladesh. USAID Office of Food for Peace Bangladesh.
World Bank. (2008). High value agriculture in Bangladesh: An assessment of Agro-business opportunities and constraints. Bangladesh Development Series Paper No. 21. Dhaka: Sustainable Agriculture Development Department, Agriculture and Rural Development Unit, South Asia Region.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix 1: Summary of Existing Policies Supporting Agricultural Intensification in Eastern IGP (Bihar, West Bengal, Nepal and Bangladesh)
Appendix 1: Summary of Existing Policies Supporting Agricultural Intensification in Eastern IGP (Bihar, West Bengal, Nepal and Bangladesh)
Policy issue, policy statement, program and practice | Implications/problemsa |
---|---|
Bihar and West Bengal | |
Inputs price (1) Seed-National Seed Policy 2002: establishment of seed banks, seed villages, national seed grid, training in seed production Price of certified seeds is fixed by the government, distribution by state agencies (national seed corporation, state seed corporations) No price control on private suppliers/multinational agencies There is a new scheme in Bihar for seed supply—Mukhyamantri Tivra Beej Vistar Yojana (2008–09) for the supply of seed at 50% subsidy in Bihar (2) Fertilizers: Fertilizer Pricing Policy-1977: Retention Price Scheme setting an ex-factory price for fertilizer specific to each unit and allowed a 12% after tax return Nutrient Based Subsidy (NBS) (2008): Decontrol of non-urea fertilizer price Government supplies urea fertilizer at issue price, which is highly subsidized; non-urea fertilizers are now only partially subsidized Irrigation Water: Canal water supply is priced on area basis and is highly subsidized Groundwater supply is a private business, but electricity for tube wells is highly subsidized. Electricity is charged on motor horse power basis Subsidized supply of diesel in drought-prone area of Bihar Mechanization: Several programs like National Food Security Mission and Krishi Yantrikaran Yojana or the Farm Mechanization scheme (2010) in Bihar, under which farm implements are supplied at subsidized cost | Limited supply, timely distribution is a problem Informal sources cover larger space Complaints of spurious seeds Private companies charge high cost High subsidy burden. Benefits inefficient. Imbalanced fertilizer use leads to soil health problems. Impure supply reported Poorly maintained canal system meets demands partially Electricity supply is poor in Bihar. Diesel-based pumping increases cost of production Good initiative to reduce production cost and facilitate intensification |
Output price As of date, some 27 commodities including jute and cotton enjoy the Minimum Support Price (MSP). However, there is no MSP for fruit, vegetables, dairy, meat, and other perishable commodities and output price is controlled by market forces Pricing-Farm Gate Pricing liberalized. Private traders sell and buy Pricing-Retail: Pricing liberalized and is controlled by private importers and traders Futures: Needs clear policy and institutional capacity building | Implementation of MSP in Bihar and West Bengal is not as efficient as in Punjab and Haryana Traders manipulate output price, form cartel and this increases producer’s vulnerability Market not yet mature to use futures |
Credit Agricultural credit is disbursed through a multi-agency network of commercial banks, Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) and Cooperative banks, Primary Agricultural Credit Societies (PACS). Credit Card (KCC) is another important medium to increase agricultural credit. The National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) plays a major role in increasing credit for agricultural inputs PACS have been more active in West Bengal and Bihar; commercial banks did brisk business through KCC Cooperative Act and Warehousing Act prohibit cooperatives and central and state warehousing from banking with private sector banks Interest rates: interest rates are regulated by the government in formal credit sector. These rates are low Microfinance institutions (MFIs) and private lenders decide their interest rates, which are high | Only land owners can get a loan. Share croppers, who are more common in Bihar and West Bengal are not eligible for a loan from the formal system Owners of flooded land also do not get a bank loan High servicing cost Increasing non-performing assets (NPA) Government loan waivers impact sustainability High informal transaction cost (bribe) may be 10–12% loan in formal credit system |
Land tenures Rural India, particularly Bihar and West Bengal, have significant portion of land (about 25%) under tenancy cultivation. Concealed tenancy has no protection of law. Land tenures are not secure | Without land ownership, access to credit from formal sources is denied |
Output markets The Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act (APMC), which made agricultural markets a state subject, was repealed in 2006 by the Bihar government, thus allowing the influx of private markets. The West Bengal government on the other hand, is presently trying to amend the APMC act, to promote agricultural reforms Most small and marginal farmers do business with local traders or in village hats | Poor transportation facility. Low volumes make transportation expensive. Farmers unable to receive remunerative prices, compelled to sell produce to the local traders visiting villages |
Insurance National Agricultural Insurance Scheme (NAIS) (1999) Weather Based Crop Insurance Scheme (WBCIS) (2007) Private companies—such as ICICI-Lombard, IFFCO-Tokio, HDFC-Ergo NAIS enabled to reach the small and marginal farmers in Bihar and West Bengal | Settlements in NAIS were fast and attained the level of 83% in Bihar and 99% West Bengal Insurance penetration is low. Mostly those taking loan from banks go for insurance |
Safety nets: Food security bill-2014, Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee (MNREGA) program | Mostly do not lead to assets creation Malpractices on large scale |
Extension service Extension Reforms (2005) to provide decentralized and demand-driven extension service through: Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA), Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVKs), Kisan Call Centres with toll free number, Farmers’ Fields Schools, NGOs, etc. Bihar Agricultural Management and Extension Training Institute (BAMETI), state agricultural universities | KVKs and Kisan call centres are quite popular The basic data on soil and water quality in GPS system at micro-scale is missing |
Disaster management Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) provides forecast and warning against drought, flood, cyclones, etc. Flood management program to provide central assistance to the flood-prone states like Bihar and West Bengal in operation. Bihar government launched a portal the Flood Management Information System (FMIS) in 2006. West Bengal government State Disaster Management Policy (2009–10) | Inadequate capacity to deal with the problem. Interagency coordination is an issue. Policy not tuned to the needs of the agricultural sector |
Nepal | |
Inputs price Seeds: Seed sector in Nepal is regulated under the Seed Act (1988) and the National Seed Policy (2000). More than 90% seed supply is through informal sector. No government price support Fertilizers: National Fertilizer Policy (2002) lays down the guiding principles. The country has been following varying subsidy regimes. A revised policy with new guidelines is under consideration Irrigation: National water Policy (NWP) (2003) and Agriculture Perspective Plan (APP) (1997–2017) lay down the guiding policies. NWP requires the users to pay not only irrigation water charges but also a share in construction cost by the users (GoN - Ministry of Agricultural Development 2012). Tube wells are private, and farmers pay for water Mechanization: Government plans are silent on mechanization. No clear policy on mechanization | Availability of quality seed is a problem. Many times, private traders supply spurious seeds The fertilizers are in short supply and there are cases of spurious supply Groundwater development has helped the farmers to raise high-value crops in study locations—Morang and Rautahat Legal/institutional reforms are planned slow progress |
Output price Agribusiness Promotion and Marketing Development Directorate (ABP and MDD) is the primary government agency responsible for policy and regulation of agricultural marketing in the country. The policy of MSP has been discontinued. Wheat, paddy, and other food grains are procured at market prices from traders and open markets | The traders buy cheap from producers and sell at higher price. Unorganized small and marginal farmers suffer |
Credit Commercial banks, development banks, and government agencies, MFIs provide saving and loan products. There is rapid growth in formal sector and regulated financial institutions (Nepal Rastra Bank, 2012). Private money lenders operate in rural areas Developmental aid from international agencies | Low access to formal credit by small farmers The situation is not very satisfactory. It is mostly dependent on international aid/development support |
Interest rates Private lenders may charge 20–30% annual interest. Formal credit sector rates are reasonable | Small and marginal farmers face problems |
Output markets No government procurement from famers. Market information availability is poor. Bilateral trade with India. Traders play major role | Connectivity is better in Terai and poor in the hills. Better grain markets in Morang |
Insurance There is no well-organized program. No private sector involvement. Some MFIs run pilot project. Farmers demand it | Farmers suffer huge losses as climate situation is very volatile |
Extension service Implementation of the Local Self Governance Act (LSGA) in 1999 was a major institutional change with respect to extension services. Departments of Agriculture, Livestock Services, Food Technology and Quality Control and Cooperatives are responsible for providing service | Poor linkage with research institution. Lack of training Insufficient funds Interdepartmental coordination is weak. Consequently, poor service |
Disaster management Natural Calamities (Relief) Act, 1982 with provision of institutional framework necessary for managing disaster Nepal Disaster Risk Reduction Consortium (NDRRC) Steering Committee (2010), a National Emergency Operations Centre under Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Irrigation for mitigation of water-induced disasters. Department of Water Induced Disaster Management for mitigation of the impacts of water-induced disasters | Operational preparedness is an issue. Financial allocations need up scaling. Coordination between the agencies is missing There is lack of comprehensive legal and policy instruments |
Bangladesh | |
Inputs price (1) Seeds: National Agricultural Policy (NAP) (1999) of Bangladesh identifies seeds and mechanization as two of the 18 areas of interventions. Seed Rules of 1998 liberalized seed import. Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation (BADC), various NGOs and the private sector are involved in seed production, procurement, and distribution No controls. Price is determined by market (2) Fertilizers: Fluctuating policy regime. Open market sale re-introduction in 2010, and substantial subsidy on non-urea fertilizers in 2012. Fertilizer distribution often a problem/lacks information dissemination (3) Water: National Agriculture Policy of Bangladesh (1999) prioritizes irrigation through surface water rather than groundwater. Barind Rain Water Conservation and Irrigation Project (2011–14) specifically at the Barind tract Irrigation water is priced. Charges vary according to the source of energy. Higher for diesel driven pumps. Rates are competitive (4) Mechanization: Imports liberalized. No subsidy. Mostly imported. Irrigation water pumping is mechanized | State agencies meet only 5–6% seed demand Private dealers hike import cost. Reports of spurious seed supply Limited availability and too high price of inputs in remote areas Supply is monopolized by a few. Surface water in the excavated canals gets polluted due to breaking of barriers by influential people Mechanization of operations other than irrigation is slow |
Output price (1) Pricing liberalized. No MSP. Private traders sell and buy, Government Task Force sometimes sets price for major commodity like rice, jute, and wheat (2) Farm gate pricing, retail pricing—Liberalized (3) Futures: Needs clear policy and institutional capacity building | Traders are reluctant to buy at government price, increases producers vulnerability Same as for India |
Credit Credit provision identified as one of most important areas of intervention The important institutions are: Bangladesh Krishi Bank (BKB), Private commercial banks and state-owned commercial banks. They provide loans to farmers/landowners and to traders, food importers, MFIs like Bangladesh Rural Advance Committee (BRAC) and Grameen Bank provide collateral free loans to the poorer sections | Hard core poor are often left out of the formal credit service Bureaucrats make national commercial banks’ credit service inaccessible to the rural poor/small farmers |
Interest rates Interest rates liberalized, banks and MFIs determine their own rates. Interest rate moderate; repayment pressure for MFI credit is very high Private lenders-high interest rate | NAP with commercial banks Poor farmers suffer |
Output markets Department of Agriculture and Marketing (DAM) oversees marketing of the agricultural products in local and international markets. Cash incentive of 15–20% for export of agro-processing products Export liberalized—no export duty No price support in domestic market. Sometimes government intervenes in case of market failure. Farm produce in study locations are mostly disposed | Cash support in export has brought in resilience Private traders syndicate controls market, market behavior is unpredictable |
Insurance Programmes initiated by Sadharan Bima Corporation (SBC) were abolished for lack of government intervention. Currently, crop insurance and livestock insurance is under consideration to be reintroduced. Asian Development Bank (ADB) has introduced a pilot project on Weather Based Crop Insurance in 2012 | In Bangladesh, agriculture is a high-risk venture. Insurance for small and marginal farmers is essential for bringing in sustainability |
Extension service New Agricultural Extension Policy (NAEP) (1996) to encourage various agencies to provide efficient and effective services. DAE has initiated ICT-based extension and agricultural marketing services Farmers Field Schools to bring awareness among farmers about climate change and adaptation strategies | Access to technology information remains deficient. This is corroborated by FGD report |
Disaster management Vital policies and frameworks including the Disaster Management Act, Disaster Management Policy (Draft), Standing Order on Disasters (SOD) are in place. A Comprehensive Disaster Management Plan (CDMP) is in operation to strengthen national capacity to manage risks related to disasters. Institutionalizing of risk reduction framework is underway. Forty most vulnerable districts developed adaptive agriculture measures to be more resilient in the face of climate change. Early warning generation, institutional capacity and the dissemination mechanism developed and operationalized by Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB), implements the flood control, drainage and irrigation (FCDI) programs | The institutionalization of disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation beyond the Ministry of Food and Disaster Management is slow The government has a well-developed model of flood management |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kishore, A., Pandey, D., Pal, B.D., Joshi, P.K., Tyagi, N.K. (2019). Institutional and Policy Related Research Gaps for Climate Resilient Farming System Intensification: A Study in Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain. In: Pal, B., Kishore, A., Joshi, P., Tyagi, N. (eds) Climate Smart Agriculture in South Asia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8171-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8171-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8170-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8171-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)