Skip to main content

Institutional and Policy Related Research Gaps for Climate Resilient Farming System Intensification: A Study in Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Smart Agriculture in South Asia

Abstract

This chapter analyzes research and capacity gaps in policies, institutions and markets in Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain (Eastern IGP), including the states of Bihar and West Bengal in India, Nepal and Bangladesh. The analysis is based on a review of existing policies, institutional framework and farmers group discussion (FGD) from selected villages in identified districts located across the Eastern IGP. A review of the existing policies and institutions indicated that a good number of required policies and institutional framework were in place, but the informal transaction cost of availing benefits of those policies by the smallholders from formal channels (banks, government departments, insurance companies, etc.) was very high. This reflected poorly on the level of governance, as the global percentile ranking of Eastern IGP states in respect of governance was in the range of 15–45%. Therefore, major reforms are required for promoting equitable access to technology and financial services; public resources management (reducing leakages) and addressing gender issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Institute for Integrated Development Studies (IIDS), Nepal; Bangladesh Centre for Advance Studies (BCAS), Bangladesh; Indian Council of Agricultural research, Eastern Region (ICAR-ER), Bihar; Uttar Banga Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, West Bengal.

  2. 2.

    Makhanas are popularly known as lotus seeds, fox nuts, Euryale ferox, gorgon nuts and phool makhana.

References

  • Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies (BCAS). (2013). Analysis of research gaps in policies. Institutions and market opportunities for climate resilient farming system intensification in Bangladesh. FGD Findings Based Report. Dhaka, Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansil, P. (2011). Bihar agriculture: A perspective (1st ed.). New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company Private Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. (1993). The conditions of agricultural growth: The economics of Agrarian change under population pressure. London: Earthsca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carswell, G. (1997). Agricultural intensification and rural sustainable livelihoods: A think piece. IDS working paper 64. www.ids.ac.uk/files/dmfile/Wp64.pdf.

  • Clarke, D. J., Mahul, O., Rao, K. N., Verma, N. (2012). Weather based crop insurance in India Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank. www.elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/pdf/10.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, E. D., & Chandrasekaran, K. (2012). A wolf in sheep’s clothing? An analysis of the ‘sustainable intensification’ of agriculture. Amsterdam: Friends of the Earth International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, K. (2011). Land use (in) efficiency: Economics and outlook for Asia and the Pacific, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific Bangkok. http://www.unep.org/roap/Portals/96/REEO_AP_CH5_Land.pdf.

  • Dorward, A., Fan, S., Kydd, J., Lofgren, H., Morrison, J., Poulton, C., et al. (2004). Institutions and policies for pro-poor agricultural growth. Development Policy Review, 22(6), 611–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C. A., Lal, R., Madden, P., Miller, R. H., & House, G. (Eds.). (1990). Sustainable agricultural systems. Ankeny (Iowa, USA): Soil and Water Conservation Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2009). Feeding the world, eradicating hunger. Rome, Italy: Background Document for World Summit on Food Security-INF/2. www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=13378&page=16.

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2011). Save and grow: A policy maker’s guide to the sustainable intensification of crop production (p. 116). Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization. http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2215e/i2215e.pdf. Accessed December 2013.

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2014). Farming systems and poverty. www.fao.org/farmingsystems/description_en.htm.

  • Garnett, T, Charles, H., & Godfray, J. (2012). Sustainable intensification in agriculture: Navigating a course through competing food system priorities. In Food climate research network and the Oxford Martin programme on the future of food. UK: University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoB - Department of Finance. (2014). Economic survey of Bihar 2013–14. Patna: Government of Bihar.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoBD - Ministry of Agriculture and FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization. (2011). Towards a food secure Bangladesh: Country programming framework 2010–15. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Government of Peoples Republic of Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoBD - Ministry of Planning. (2011). Agricultural census of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Dhaka: Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoBD - Ministry of Planning. (2014). Yearbook of agricultural statistics—2012, 24th series (Chap. 8). Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Dhaka: Government of Peoples Republic of Bangladesh, pp. 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoI - Ministry of Agriculture. (2013). State of Indian agriculture 2012–13. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Government of India. New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoI - Planning Commission. (2010). West Bengal development report. New Delhi: Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoI - Planning Commission. (2012). Poverty estimates for 2009–10. India: Press Information Bureau, Government of India, March 19, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoI - Special Task Force Agriculture (STFA). (2008). Bihar’s agriculture development: Opportunities and challenges-task force report. New Delhi: Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoN - Ministry of Agricultural Development. (2012). Statistical information on Nepalese agriculture 2011/2012. Kathmandu: Agri-Business Promotion and Statistics Division, Government of Nepal.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoN - National Planning Commission. (2014). Nepal human development report 2014. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal. http://www.npc.gov.np/new/uploadedFiles/allFiles/NHDR_Report_2014.pdf. Last accessed December 18, 2018.

  • GoWB - Department of Finance. (2012). Economic review of West Bengal, Government of West Bengal, Kolkata. http://www.wbfin.nic.in/writereaddata/EconomicReview11_Part2.pdf. Last accessed December 16, 2018.

  • GoWB - Department of Planning and Statistics. (2012). Statistical handbook. Kolkata: Government of West Bengal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Integrated Development Studies (IIDS). (2013). Policy and institutions related research gaps for climate resilient farming system intensification in Nepal. Kathmandu: Nepal.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). (2013). Research gaps in policies and institutions for climate resilient farming systems intensification: A diagnostic study in Eastern Indo-Gangetic plains (Draft Report). New Delhi: IFPRI South Asia Regional Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). (2006). Nepal country strategic opportunities programme report for review (Document No. EB 2006/89/R.14/Rev.1). Rome: Executive Board—Eighty-Ninth Session.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). (2012). Progress report on implementation of the performance-based allocation system. https://webapps.ifad.org/members/gc/35/docs/GC-35-L-10.pdf.

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate change (IPCC). (2007). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. In: R. K. Pachauri & A. Reisinger (Eds.), Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (104 p). Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Draft Policy Research Working Paper. www.govindica-tors.org.

  • Mandemaker, M., Bakker, M., & Stoorvogel, J. (2011). The role of governance in agricultural expansion and intensification: A global study of arable agriculture. Ecology and Society, 16(2), 8. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art8/;http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04142-160208.

  • National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS). (2013). Water use potential of flood-affected and drought prone areas of Eastern India (NAAS Policy Paper 60, p. 20). New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pingali, P., Bigot, Y., & Binswanger, H. P. (1987). Agricultural mechanization and the evolution of farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppy, G. M., Jepson, P. C., Pickett, J. A., & Birkett, M. A. (2014). Achieving food and environmental security: New approaches to close the gap. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20120272. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J. (1997). The sustainable intensification of agriculture. Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 21(4), 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, T., & Kelly, V. (1999). Policy reforms and sustainable agricultural intensification in Africa. Development Policy Review, 17, 375–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rota, A., & Sperandini, S. (2014). Value chains, linking producers to the markets: Thematic paper on livestock, international fund for agricultural development, Rome, Italy. www.ifad.org/lrkm/index.htm. Accessed on June 29, 2014.

  • Sehgal, V. K., Singh, M. R., Chaudhary, A., Jain, N., & Pathak, H. (2013). Vulnerability of agriculture to climate change: District level assessment in the Indo-Gangetic plains (p. 74). New Delhi: Indian Agricultural Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seth, A. (2009). Institutions and rural services: Lessons from IFAD-supported projects in Asia. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). http://www.ifad.org/operations/projects/regions/pi/paper/9.pdf.

  • Spielman, D. J. (2014). Evaluating the “new agronomy”, in global food policy report. Washington, D.C.: International food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, T. S., Mainuddin, K., Cathy, C., Rahman, A., Haque, A., Islam, N., et al. (2012). Agriculture and adaptation in Bangladesh: Current and projected impacts of climate change—A report for USAID. ftp://cgiar.org/ifpri/LDanessi/USAID-Reports/.

  • The Montpellier Panel. (2013). Sustainable intensification: A new paradigm for African agriculture. London: Agriculture for Impact.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiffen, M., Mortimore, M., & Gichuki, F. (1994). More people, less erosion: Environmental recovery in Kenya. Chichester: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyagi, N. K., Joshi, P. K., Aggarwal, P. K., & Pandey, D. (2013). Impact of government policies, programs on climate change adaptation, mitigation, and resilience in agriculture in South Asia. Paper presented in CCAFS Workshop on Institutions and policies for scaling-up climate-smart agriculture, December 2–5, 2013, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN). (2009). The Millennium development goals report. http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/MDG_Report_2009_ENG.pdf.

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (2013). Human development report 2013, the rise of the South: Human progress in a diverse world. New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (2009). Policy study on the probable impacts of climate change on poverty and economic growth and the options of coping with adverse effect of climate change in Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2011). Resource efficiency: Economics and outlook for Asia and the Pacific. Thailand: Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific United Nations Environment Programme Bangkok.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2013). UN data 2012, 2013. United Nations Statistics Division. http://unstats.un.org/unsd/energy/edbase.htm.

  • United States Agency for International development (USAID). (2009). Best (Bellmon Estimation Studies for Title II) Analysis Bangladesh. USAID Office of Food for Peace Bangladesh.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2008). High value agriculture in Bangladesh: An assessment of Agro-business opportunities and constraints. Bangladesh Development Series Paper No. 21. Dhaka: Sustainable Agriculture Development Department, Agriculture and Rural Development Unit, South Asia Region.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avinash Kishore .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1: Summary of Existing Policies Supporting Agricultural Intensification in Eastern IGP (Bihar, West Bengal, Nepal and Bangladesh)

Appendix 1: Summary of Existing Policies Supporting Agricultural Intensification in Eastern IGP (Bihar, West Bengal, Nepal and Bangladesh)

Policy issue, policy statement, program and practice

Implications/problemsa

Bihar and West Bengal

Inputs price

(1) Seed-National Seed Policy 2002: establishment of seed banks, seed villages, national seed grid, training in seed production

Price of certified seeds is fixed by the government, distribution by state agencies (national seed corporation, state seed corporations)

No price control on private suppliers/multinational agencies

There is a new scheme in Bihar for seed supply—Mukhyamantri Tivra Beej Vistar Yojana (2008–09) for the supply of seed at 50% subsidy in Bihar

(2) Fertilizers: Fertilizer Pricing Policy-1977: Retention Price Scheme setting an ex-factory price for fertilizer specific to each unit and allowed a 12% after tax return

Nutrient Based Subsidy (NBS) (2008): Decontrol of non-urea fertilizer price

Government supplies urea fertilizer at issue price, which is highly subsidized; non-urea fertilizers are now only partially subsidized

Irrigation Water: Canal water supply is priced on area basis and is highly subsidized

Groundwater supply is a private business, but electricity for tube wells is highly subsidized. Electricity is charged on motor horse power basis

Subsidized supply of diesel in drought-prone area of Bihar

Mechanization: Several programs like National Food Security Mission and Krishi Yantrikaran Yojana or the Farm Mechanization scheme (2010) in Bihar, under which farm implements are supplied at subsidized cost

Limited supply, timely distribution is a problem

Informal sources cover larger space

Complaints of spurious seeds

Private companies charge high cost

High subsidy burden. Benefits inefficient. Imbalanced fertilizer use leads to soil health problems. Impure supply reported

Poorly maintained canal system meets demands partially

Electricity supply is poor in Bihar. Diesel-based pumping increases cost of production

Good initiative to reduce production cost and facilitate intensification

Output price

As of date, some 27 commodities including jute and cotton enjoy the Minimum Support Price (MSP). However, there is no MSP for fruit, vegetables, dairy, meat, and other perishable commodities and output price is controlled by market forces

Pricing-Farm Gate Pricing liberalized. Private traders sell and buy

Pricing-Retail: Pricing liberalized and is controlled by private importers and traders

Futures: Needs clear policy and institutional capacity building

Implementation of MSP in Bihar and West Bengal is not as efficient as in Punjab and Haryana

Traders manipulate output price, form cartel and this increases producer’s vulnerability

Market not yet mature to use futures

Credit

Agricultural credit is disbursed through a multi-agency network of commercial banks, Regional Rural Banks (RRBs) and Cooperative banks, Primary Agricultural Credit Societies (PACS). Credit Card (KCC) is another important medium to increase agricultural credit. The National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) plays a major role in increasing credit for agricultural inputs

PACS have been more active in West Bengal and Bihar; commercial banks did brisk business through KCC

Cooperative Act and Warehousing Act prohibit cooperatives and central and state warehousing from banking with private sector banks

Interest rates: interest rates are regulated by the government in formal credit sector. These rates are low

Microfinance institutions (MFIs) and private lenders decide their interest rates, which are high

Only land owners can get a loan. Share croppers, who are more common in Bihar and West Bengal are not eligible for a loan from the formal system

Owners of flooded land also do not get a bank loan

High servicing cost

Increasing non-performing assets (NPA)

Government loan waivers impact sustainability

High informal transaction cost (bribe) may be 10–12% loan in formal credit system

Land tenures

Rural India, particularly Bihar and West Bengal, have significant portion of land (about 25%) under tenancy cultivation. Concealed tenancy has no protection of law. Land tenures are not secure

Without land ownership, access to credit from formal sources is denied

Output markets

The Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act (APMC), which made agricultural markets a state subject, was repealed in 2006 by the Bihar government, thus allowing the influx of private markets. The West Bengal government on the other hand, is presently trying to amend the APMC act, to promote agricultural reforms

Most small and marginal farmers do business with local traders or in village hats

Poor transportation facility. Low volumes make transportation expensive. Farmers unable to receive remunerative prices, compelled to sell produce to the local traders visiting villages

Insurance

National Agricultural Insurance Scheme (NAIS) (1999)

Weather Based Crop Insurance Scheme (WBCIS) (2007)

Private companies—such as ICICI-Lombard, IFFCO-Tokio, HDFC-Ergo

NAIS enabled to reach the small and marginal farmers in Bihar and West Bengal

Settlements in NAIS were fast and attained the level of 83% in Bihar and 99% West Bengal

Insurance penetration is low. Mostly those taking loan from banks go for insurance

Safety nets: Food security bill-2014, Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee (MNREGA) program

Mostly do not lead to assets creation

Malpractices on large scale

Extension service

Extension Reforms (2005) to provide decentralized and demand-driven extension service through: Agricultural Technology Management Agency (ATMA), Krishi Vigyan Kendras (KVKs), Kisan Call Centres with toll free number, Farmers’ Fields Schools, NGOs, etc.

Bihar Agricultural Management and Extension Training Institute (BAMETI), state agricultural universities

KVKs and Kisan call centres are quite popular

The basic data on soil and water quality in GPS system at micro-scale is missing

Disaster management

Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) provides forecast and warning against drought, flood, cyclones, etc. Flood management program to provide central assistance to the flood-prone states like Bihar and West Bengal in operation. Bihar government launched a portal the Flood Management Information System (FMIS) in 2006. West Bengal government State Disaster Management Policy (2009–10)

Inadequate capacity to deal with the problem. Interagency coordination is an issue. Policy not tuned to the needs of the agricultural sector

Nepal

Inputs price

Seeds: Seed sector in Nepal is regulated under the Seed Act (1988) and the National Seed Policy (2000). More than 90% seed supply is through informal sector. No government price support

Fertilizers: National Fertilizer Policy (2002) lays down the guiding principles. The country has been following varying subsidy regimes. A revised policy with new guidelines is under consideration

Irrigation: National water Policy (NWP) (2003) and Agriculture Perspective Plan (APP) (1997–2017) lay down the guiding policies. NWP requires the users to pay not only irrigation water charges but also a share in construction cost by the users (GoN - Ministry of Agricultural Development 2012). Tube wells are private, and farmers pay for water

Mechanization: Government plans are silent on mechanization. No clear policy on mechanization

Availability of quality seed is a problem. Many times, private traders supply spurious seeds

The fertilizers are in short supply and there are cases of spurious supply

Groundwater development has helped the farmers to raise high-value crops in study locations—Morang and Rautahat

Legal/institutional reforms are planned slow progress

Output price

Agribusiness Promotion and Marketing Development Directorate (ABP and MDD) is the primary government agency responsible for policy and regulation of agricultural marketing in the country. The policy of MSP has been discontinued. Wheat, paddy, and other food grains are procured at market prices from traders and open markets

The traders buy cheap from producers and sell at higher price. Unorganized small and marginal farmers suffer

Credit

Commercial banks, development banks, and government agencies, MFIs provide saving and loan products. There is rapid growth in formal sector and regulated financial institutions (Nepal Rastra Bank, 2012). Private money lenders operate in rural areas

Developmental aid from international agencies

Low access to formal credit by small farmers

The situation is not very satisfactory. It is mostly dependent on international aid/development support

Interest rates

Private lenders may charge 20–30% annual interest. Formal credit sector rates are reasonable

Small and marginal farmers face problems

Output markets

No government procurement from famers. Market information availability is poor. Bilateral trade with India. Traders play major role

Connectivity is better in Terai and poor in the hills. Better grain markets in Morang

Insurance

There is no well-organized program. No private sector involvement. Some MFIs run pilot project. Farmers demand it

Farmers suffer huge losses as climate situation is very volatile

Extension service

Implementation of the Local Self Governance Act (LSGA) in 1999 was a major institutional change with respect to extension services. Departments of Agriculture, Livestock Services, Food Technology and Quality Control and Cooperatives are responsible for providing service

Poor linkage with research institution. Lack of training

Insufficient funds

Interdepartmental coordination is weak. Consequently, poor service

Disaster management

Natural Calamities (Relief) Act, 1982 with provision of institutional framework necessary for managing disaster

Nepal Disaster Risk Reduction Consortium (NDRRC) Steering Committee (2010), a National Emergency Operations Centre under Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Irrigation for mitigation of water-induced disasters. Department of Water Induced Disaster Management for mitigation of the impacts of water-induced disasters

Operational preparedness is an issue. Financial allocations need up scaling. Coordination between the agencies is missing

There is lack of comprehensive legal and policy instruments

Bangladesh

Inputs price

(1) Seeds: National Agricultural Policy (NAP) (1999) of Bangladesh identifies seeds and mechanization as two of the 18 areas of interventions. Seed Rules of 1998 liberalized seed import. Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation (BADC), various NGOs and the private sector are involved in seed production, procurement, and distribution

No controls. Price is determined by market

(2) Fertilizers: Fluctuating policy regime. Open market sale re-introduction in 2010, and substantial subsidy on non-urea fertilizers in 2012. Fertilizer distribution often a problem/lacks information dissemination

(3) Water: National Agriculture Policy of Bangladesh (1999) prioritizes irrigation through surface water rather than groundwater. Barind Rain Water Conservation and Irrigation Project (2011–14) specifically at the Barind tract

Irrigation water is priced. Charges vary according to the source of energy. Higher for diesel driven pumps. Rates are competitive

(4) Mechanization: Imports liberalized. No subsidy. Mostly imported. Irrigation water pumping is mechanized

State agencies meet only 5–6% seed demand

Private dealers hike import cost. Reports of spurious seed supply

Limited availability and too high price of inputs in remote areas

Supply is monopolized by a few. Surface water in the excavated canals gets polluted due to breaking of barriers by influential people

Mechanization of operations other than irrigation is slow

Output price

(1) Pricing liberalized. No MSP. Private traders sell and buy, Government Task Force sometimes sets price for major commodity like rice, jute, and wheat

(2) Farm gate pricing, retail pricing—Liberalized

(3) Futures: Needs clear policy and institutional capacity building

Traders are reluctant to buy at government price, increases producers vulnerability

Same as for India

Credit

Credit provision identified as one of most important areas of intervention

The important institutions are: Bangladesh Krishi Bank (BKB), Private commercial banks and state-owned commercial banks. They provide loans to farmers/landowners and to traders, food importers, MFIs like Bangladesh Rural Advance Committee (BRAC) and Grameen Bank provide collateral free loans to the poorer sections

Hard core poor are often left out of the formal credit service

Bureaucrats make national commercial banks’ credit service inaccessible to the rural poor/small farmers

Interest rates

Interest rates liberalized, banks and MFIs determine their own rates. Interest rate moderate; repayment pressure for MFI credit is very high

Private lenders-high interest rate

NAP with commercial banks

Poor farmers suffer

Output markets

Department of Agriculture and Marketing (DAM) oversees marketing of the agricultural products in local and international markets. Cash incentive of 15–20% for export of agro-processing products

Export liberalized—no export duty

No price support in domestic market. Sometimes government intervenes in case of market failure. Farm produce in study locations are mostly disposed

Cash support in export has brought in resilience

Private traders syndicate controls market, market behavior is unpredictable

Insurance

Programmes initiated by Sadharan Bima Corporation (SBC) were abolished for lack of government intervention. Currently, crop insurance and livestock insurance is under consideration to be reintroduced. Asian Development Bank (ADB) has introduced a pilot project on Weather Based Crop Insurance in 2012

In Bangladesh, agriculture is a high-risk venture. Insurance for small and marginal farmers is essential for bringing in sustainability

Extension service

New Agricultural Extension Policy (NAEP) (1996) to encourage various agencies to provide efficient and effective services. DAE has initiated ICT-based extension and agricultural marketing services

Farmers Field Schools to bring awareness among farmers about climate change and adaptation strategies

Access to technology information remains deficient. This is corroborated by FGD report

Disaster management

Vital policies and frameworks including the Disaster Management Act, Disaster Management Policy (Draft), Standing Order on Disasters (SOD) are in place. A Comprehensive Disaster Management Plan (CDMP) is in operation to strengthen national capacity to manage risks related to disasters. Institutionalizing of risk reduction framework is underway. Forty most vulnerable districts developed adaptive agriculture measures to be more resilient in the face of climate change. Early warning generation, institutional capacity and the dissemination mechanism developed and operationalized by Bangladesh Water Development Board (BWDB), implements the flood control, drainage and irrigation (FCDI) programs

The institutionalization of disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation beyond the Ministry of Food and Disaster Management is slow

The government has a well-developed model of flood management

  1. aThe comments in this column are based on: synthesized reports, focus group discussion reports and consultation workshop reports from the collaborating partners in India, Nepal, and Bangladesh, which have been referred to elsewhere in this paper

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kishore, A., Pandey, D., Pal, B.D., Joshi, P.K., Tyagi, N.K. (2019). Institutional and Policy Related Research Gaps for Climate Resilient Farming System Intensification: A Study in Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain. In: Pal, B., Kishore, A., Joshi, P., Tyagi, N. (eds) Climate Smart Agriculture in South Asia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8171-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8171-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8170-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8171-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics