Operationalizing the Action and Advocacy Agenda for Quality of Care

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on efforts to accelerate advocacy for and operationalize action on quality of care, presenting key initiatives implemented by the government and NGOs. Over the years, many recommendations have been made by researchers, activists, and observers to improve quality of care in the Indian family planning programme. These have included actions at the facility, programme, and policy levels. Many NGOs and development partners are also assisting government in implementing these measures. There is now widespread awareness and appreciation of the need to expand contraceptive choice and improve the quality of care. Quality of family planning services is a multidimensional concept, comprising various elements ranging from the provision of informed choice to adherence to standard management protocols. This chapter draws on ideas presented in various sections of this book that look at interventions, research, and commitment to addressing the unmet need for family planning in India. It dwells on the broader communication and advocacy requirements for sustaining commitment to quality of care by different stakeholders.

Keywords

Accelerating advocacy Service delivery Guidelines Quality assurance Commitment to quality of care 

References

  1. Askew, I., & Brady, M. (2013). Reviewing the evidence and identifying gaps in family planning research: The unfinished agenda to meet FP2020 goals. Background document for the Family Planning Research Donor Meeting, Washington, D.C., December 3–4.Google Scholar
  2. Gogoi, A., & Jha, D. (2015). Empowering clients to demand QoC for maternal health using mobile technology: A pilot study in Jharkhand. In International Conference on Family Planning, Panel 199.Google Scholar
  3. HRLN (Human Rights Law Network). (2016). Devika Biswas v. Union of India & Ors (WP [C] 95/2012). http://www.hrln.org/hrln/images/stories/pdf/Devika-Directions-Sought-May2014.pdf. Accessed February 1, 2018.
  4. Jain, A., Bruce, J., & Mensch, B. (1992). Setting standards of quality in family planning programs. Studies in Family Planning, 23(6 Pt 1), 392–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kavanaugh, M. L., & Anderson, R. M. (2013). Contraception and beyond: The health benefits of services provided at family planning centres. New York: Guttmacher Institute. http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/health-benefits.pdf. Accessed February 1, 2018.
  6. MoHFW, (2013). A strategic Approach to RMNCH+A. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.Google Scholar
  7. Nadia Diamond-Smith, Martha Campbell & Seema Madan. (2012). Misinformation and fear of side-effects of family planning, Culture, Health & Sexuality, 14:4, 421–433,  10.1080/13691058.2012.664659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. NSHRC, (2016). National quality assurance standards for public health facilities. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. (National Health Systems Resource Centre).Google Scholar
  9. RamaRao, S., & Jain, A. K. (2015). Aligning goals, intents, and performance indicators in family planning service delivery. Studies in Family Planning, 46(1), 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Satia, J., Chauhan, K., Bhattacharya, A., & Mishra, N. (2015). Innovations in family planning: Case studies from India. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Starbird, E., Norton, M., & Marcus, R. (2016). Investing in family planning: Key to achieving the sustainable development goals. Global Health: Science and Practice, 4(2), 191–210.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Public Health GandhinagarGandhinagarIndia
  2. 2.Public Health Foundation of IndiaGurgaonIndia

Personalised recommendations