Skip to main content

Finding the Minimal Sufficient Set in Causal Graph Under Interventions: A Dimension Reduction Method for Data Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Wireless Sensor Networks (CWSN 2017)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 812))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

One of the ultimate goals of data analysis is to uncover the inherent causality in data. Pearl’s causal graph model provides the fundamental framework for measuring changes caused by external interventions that are commonly used to reveal the causality. Although the criteria and algorithms of atomic intervention for evaluating causal effects have been proposed in previous studies, the research of causal effects under conditional intervention remains inadequate. In this paper, we propose a criterion to combine the back-door criterion of atomic intervention with conditional intervention when the treatment variable is unique. Under the criterion, the derived minimal sufficient sets under atomic intervention (a-MSSs) can be converted into the one under conditional intervention (c-MSSs). The calculation of c-MSSs can remarkably decrease the complexity of target data analysis regarding data dimension reduction. Based on those steps, we also develop an algorithm to implement the conversion. Case studies demonstrate that our algorithm can enumerate both a-MSSs and c-MSSs effectively when a causal graph is given, which validates the effectiveness of our proposed scheme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Han, J., Pei, J., Kamber, M.: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bechini, A., Marcelloni, F., Segatori, A.: A MapReduce solution for associative classification of big data. Inf. Sci. 332(C), 33–55 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li, L., Lu, R., Choo, K.K.R., Datta, A., Shao, J.: Privacy-preserving-outsourced association rule mining on vertically partitioned databases. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 11(8), 1847–1861 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pearl, J.: An introduction to causal inference. Int. J. Biostat. 6(2), 1–62 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Imbens, G.W., Rubin, D.B.: Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, J., Mueller, K.: The visual causality analyst: an interactive interface for causal reasoning. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graph. 22(1), 230–239 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pearl, J.: Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika 82(4), 669–688 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Shpitser, I., Pearl, J.: Identification of conditional interventional distributions. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 437–444 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bareinboim, E., Pearl, J.: Causal inference and the data-fusion problem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113(27), 7345–7352 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shan, N.: Causal inference based on causal network. Northeast Normal University (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Textor, J., Liskiewicz, M.: Adjustment criteria in causal diagrams: an algorithmic perspective. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 681–688 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Perković, E., Textor, J., Kalisch, M., Maathuis, M.H.: A complete generalized adjustment criterion. In: Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 682–691 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Textor, J.: Drawing and analyzing causal dags with dagitty. Nucleic Acids Res. 32(10), 3220–3227 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Textor, J., Hardt, J., Knüppel, S.: DAGitty: a graphical tool for analyzing causal diagrams. Epidemiology 22(5), 745–751 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kyono, T.M.: Commentator: a front-end user-interface module for graphical and structural equation modeling. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lauritzen, S.L., Dawid, A.P., Larsen, B.N., Leimer, H.G.: Independence properties of directed Markov fields. Networks 20(5), 491–505 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Shrier, I., Platt, R.W.: Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 8(1), 70 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingsong Cai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pan, M., Cai, Q. (2018). Finding the Minimal Sufficient Set in Causal Graph Under Interventions: A Dimension Reduction Method for Data Analysis. In: Li, J., et al. Wireless Sensor Networks. CWSN 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 812. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8123-1_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8123-1_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-8122-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-8123-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics