Human Factors and Ergonomics in the Individual Adoption and Use of Electric Vehicles

  • Thomas Franke
  • Franziska Schmalfuß
  • Nadine Rauh
Chapter

Abstract

Electric vehicles (EVs) can contribute to sustainable individual road transport. That is, they constitute one key element in the broader context of sustainable urban design, which also incorporates important further measures such as promoting public transport, cycling, and walking. However, for EVs to achieve an optimal sustainability effect, several human factors issues need to be addressed. The present chapter gives an overview of ergonomics research in this field with a focus on battery electric vehicles (BEVs). We focus on four core areas: (1) the acceptance of BEVs (e.g. perceived barriers, the effect of practical experience, range acceptance), (2) user interaction with BEV range (e.g. range comfort zone, range stress, or range anxiety), (3) users’ charging behaviour (e.g. interaction styles, green charging), and (4) ecodriving in EV usage (e.g. representation of energy flows, ecodriving control strategies). This overview demonstrates the importance of a comprehensive understanding and support of user-resource interaction in order to realise the sustainability potential of EVs.

Keywords

Electric vehicles Acceptance Range anxiety Range stress Charging style Ecodriving 

References

  1. Achtnicht, M., Bühler, G., & Hermeling, C. (2012). The impact of fuel availability on demand for alternative-fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17, 262–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almasy, S. (2010, October 20). The new fear: Electric car ‘RA’. Retrieved February 14, 2017, from http://edition.cnn.com/2010/US/10/18/ev.charging.stations/index.html
  4. Amoroso, F. A., & Cappuccino, G. (2012). Advantages of efficiency-aware smart charging strategies for PEVs. Energy Conversion and Management, 54, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arend, M. G., & Franke, T. (2016). The role of interaction patterns with hybrid electric vehicle eco-features for drivers’ eco-driving performance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816670819
  6. Bakker, S., & Trip, J. J. (2013). Policy options to support the adoption of electric vehicles in the urban environment. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 25, 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barkenbus, J. N. (2010). Eco-driving: An overlooked climate change initiative. Energy Policy, 38, 762–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barth, M., Jugert, P., & Fritsche, I. (2016). Still underdetected – Social norms and collective efficacy predict the acceptance of electric vehicles in Germany. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 37, 64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. BBC. (2013, March 7). Electric car maker on ‘RA’ among potential buyers. Retrieved February 14, 2017, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-21695901
  10. Birrell, S. A., Taylor, J., McGordon, A., Son, J., & Jennings, P. (2014). Analysis of three independent real-world driving studies: A data driven and expert analysis approach to determining parameters affecting fuel economy. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 33, 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Birrell, S. A., Young, M. S., & Weldon, A. M. (2013). Vibrotactile pedals: Provision of haptic feedback to support economical driving. Ergonomics, 56, 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bühler, F., Cocron, P., Neumann, I., Franke, T., & Krems, J. F. (2014). Is EV experience related to EV acceptance? Results from a German field study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 25(A), 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bühler, F., Franke, T., Schleinitz, K., Cocron, P., Neumann, I., Ischebeck, M., & Krems, J. F. (2014). Driving an EV with no opportunity to charge at home – Is this acceptable? In D. de Waard, K. Brookhuis, R. Wiczorek, F. di Nocera, R. Brouwer, P. Barham, C. Weikert, A. Kluge, W. Gerbino, & A. Toffetti (Eds.), Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society Europe chapter 2013 annual conference, pp. 369–379. Retrieved February 14, 2017, from http://www.hfes-europe.org/largefiles/proceedingshfeseurope2013.pdf
  14. Bunzeck, I., Feenstra, C. F. J., & Paukovic, M. (2011). Preferences of potential users of electric cars related to charging – A survey in eight EU countries. Retrieved February 14, 2017, from http://www.d-incert.nl/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/rapportage_ECN.pdf
  15. Burgess, M., King, N., Harris, M., & Lewis, E. (2013). Electric vehicle drivers’ reported interactions with the public: Driving stereotype change? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 17, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Capros, R., Tasios, N., De Vita, A., Mantzos, L., & Paroussos, L. (2012). Transformations of the energy system in the context of the decarbonisation of the EU economy in the time horizon to 2050. Energy Strategy Reviews, 1, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carroll, S. (2010). The smart move trial: Description and initial results. London: Cenex. Retrieved February 14, 2017, from http://www.cenex.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/2010-03-23-Smart-move-trial-report-v3-Compatibility-mode-11.pdf
  18. Chan, C. C., Jian, L., & Tu, D. (2014). Smart charging of electric vehicles – Integration of energy and information. IET Electrical Systems in Transportation, 4, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clark, D. A., & Beck, A. T. (2011). Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders – Science and practice. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Cocron, P., Bühler, F., Franke, T., Neumann, I., Dielmann, B., & Krems, J. F. (2013). Energy recapture through deceleration – Regenerative braking in electric vehicles from a user perspective. Ergonomics, 56, 1203–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cocron, P., & Krems, J. F. (2013). Silent driving in urban traffic – Results of two field studies on electric vehicles. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 58, 122–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dagsvik, J. K., Wennemo, T., Wetterwald, D. G., & Aaberge, R. (2002). Potential demand for alternative fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 36, 361–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Daina, N., Polak, J. W., & Sivakumar, A. (2015). Patent and latent predictors of electric vehicle charging behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2502, 116–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Daziano, R. A. (2013). Conditional-logit Bayes estimators for consumer valuation of electric vehicle driving range. Resource and Energy Economics, 35, 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Derollepot, R., Weiß, C., Kolli, Z., Franke, T., Trigui, R., Chlond, B., et al. (2014). Optimizing components size of an extended range electric vehicle according to the use specifications. In IFSTTAR proceedings of the 5th transport research arena (TRA) 2014, Paris, France. Retrieved February 14, 2017, from http://www.evrest-project.org/pdf/TRA2014_Fpaper_18329.pdf
  26. Dimitropoulos, A., Rietveld, P., & van Ommeren, J. N. (2013). Consumer valuation of changes in driving range: A meta-analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 55, 27–45.Google Scholar
  27. Duarte, G. O., Gonçalves, G. A., & Farias, T. L. (2016). Analysis of fuel consumption and pollutant emissions of regulated and alternative driving cycles based on real-world measurements. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 44, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eberle, U., & von Helmolt, R. (2010). Sustainable transportation based on electric vehicle concepts: A brief overview. Energy & Environmental Science, 3, 689–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Egbue, O., & Long, S. (2012). Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy, 48, 717–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Elander, J., West, R., & French, D. (1993). Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road-traffic crash risk: An examination of methods and findings. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ewing, G. O., & Sarigöllü, E. (1998). Car fuel-type choice under travel demand management and economic incentives. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 3, 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Franke, T., Arend, M. G., McIlroy, R. C., & Stanton, N. A. (2016). Ecodriving in hybrid electric vehicles – Exploring challenges for user-energy interaction. Applied Ergonomics, 55, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Franke, T., Cocron, P., Bühler, F., Neumann, I., & Krems, J. F. (2012). Adapting to the range of an electric vehicle: The relation of experience to subjectively available mobility resources. In P. Valero Mora, J. F. Pace, & L. Mendoza (Eds.), Proceedings of the European conference on human centred design for intelligent transport systems, Valencia, Spain, June 14–15 2012 (pp. 95–103). Lyon, France: Humanist Publications.Google Scholar
  34. Franke, T., Günther, M., Trantow, M., Krems, J. F., Vilimek, R., & Keinath, A. (2014). Examining user-range interaction in battery electric vehicles – A field study approach. In N. Stanton, S. Landry, G. Di Bucchianico, & A. Vallicelli (Eds.), Advances in human aspects of transportation part II. AHFE conference (pp. 334–344.) AHFE Conference.Google Scholar
  35. Franke, T., Günther, M., Trantow, M., Rauh, N., & Krems, J. F. (2015). Range comfort zone of electric vehicle users – Concept and assessment. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 9, 740–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Franke, T., & Krems, J. F. (2013a). Interacting with limited mobility resources: Psychological range levels in electric vehicle use. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 109–122.Google Scholar
  37. Franke, T., & Krems, J. F. (2013b). Understanding charging behaviour of electric vehicle users. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 21, 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Franke, T., & Krems, J. F. (2013c). What drives range preferences in electric vehicle users? Transport Policy, 30, 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Franke, T., Neumann, I., Bühler, F., Cocron, P., & Krems, J. F. (2012). Experiencing range in an electric vehicle – Understanding psychological barriers. Applied Psychology, 61, 368–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Franke, T., Rauh, N., Günther, M., Trantow, M., & Krems, J. F. (2016). Which factors can protect against range stress in everyday usage of battery electric vehicles? Towards enhancing sustainability of electric mobility systems. Human Factors, 58, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Franke, T., Rauh, N., & Krems, J. F. (2015). Individual differences in BEV drivers’ range stress during first encounter of a critical range situation. Applied Ergonomics, 57, 28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Franke, T., Schneidereit, T., Günther, M., & Krems, J. F. (2015). Solving the range challenge? Range needs versus range preferences for battery electric vehicles with range extender. In Proceedings of the EVS28, Goyang, Korea. Retrieved February 14, 2017, from http://www.evs28.org/event_file/event_file/1/pfile/Franke_et_al._RangeExtender_EVS28_0195_2.pdf
  43. Franke, T., Trantow, M., Günther, M., Krems, J. F., Zott, V., & Keinath, A. (2015). Advancing electric vehicle range displays for enhanced user experience – The relevance of trust and adaptability. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications (pp. 249–256). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  44. Fuller, R. (2005). Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 37, 461–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Giffi, C., Vitale, J. Jr., Drew, M., Kuboshima, Y., & Sase, M. (2011). Unplugged: Electric vehicle realities versus consumer expectations. Retrieved February 14, 2017, from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Manufacturing/gx_us_auto_DTTGlobalAutoSurvey_ElectricVehicles_100411.pdf
  46. Hancock, P. A., & Warm, J. S. (1989). A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. Human Factors, 31, 519–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hawkins, T. R., Gausen, O. M., & Strømman, A. H. (2012). Environmental impacts of hybrid and electric vehicles – A review. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17, 997–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Helmbrecht, M., Olaverri-Monreal, C., Bengler, K., Vilimek, R., & Keinath, A. (2014). How electric vehicles affect driving behavioral patterns. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems, 6(3), 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hidrue, M. K., Parsons, G. R., Kempton, W., & Gardner, M. P. (2011). Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resource and Energy Economics, 33, 686–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Higgins, A., Paevere, P., Gardner, J., & Quezada, G. (2012). Combining choice modelling and multi-criteria analysis for technology diffusion: An application to the uptake of electric vehicles. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79, 1399–1412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. International Energy Agency. (2016). Global EV outlook 2016: Beyond one million electric cars. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/Global_EV_Outlook_2016.pdf
  52. Isaksson, O., & Fagerholt, A. (2012). Smart charging for electric vehicles. Ericsson Business Review, 3, 32–36.Google Scholar
  53. Jamson, S., Brouwer, R., & Seewald, P. (2015). Technologies to support green driving [special issue]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 58(D), 629–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jensen, A. F., Cherchi, E., & Mabit, S. L. (2013). On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 25, 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jochem, P., Babrowski, S., & Fichtner, W. (2015). Assessing CO2 emissions of electric vehicles in Germany in 2030. Transportation Research A: Policy and Practice, 78, 68–83.Google Scholar
  56. Jung, M. F., Sirkin, D., Gür, T. M., & Steinert, M. (2015). Displayed uncertainty improves driving experience and behavior: The case of range anxiety in an electric car. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems 2015 (pp. 2201–2210). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  57. Klöckner, C. A. (2014). The dynamics of purchasing an electric vehicle – A prospective longitudinal study of the decision-making process. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 24, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Knowles, M., Scott, H., & Baglee, D. (2012). The effect of driving style on electric vehicle performance, economy and perception. International Journal of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles, 4, 228–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kuriyama, M., Yamamoto, S., & Miyatake, M. (2010). Theoretical study on eco-driving technique for an electric vehicle with dynamic programming. In 2010 international conference on electrical machines and systems, Incheon, South Korea, pp. 2026–2030.Google Scholar
  60. Kuwano, M., Tsukai, M., & Matsubara, T. (2012). Analysis on promoting factors of electric vehicles with social conformity. Paper presented at the 13th international conference on travel behaviour research, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  61. Labeye, E., Hugot, M., Brusque, C., & Regan, M. A. (2016). The electric vehicle: A new driving experience involving specific skills and rules. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 37, 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lajunen, T., & Özkan, T. (2011). Self-report instruments and methods. In B. E. Porter (Ed.), Handbook of traffic psychology (pp. 43–59). London: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Larson, P. D., Viáfara, J., Parsons, R. V., & Elias, A. (2014). Consumer attitudes about electric cars: Pricing analysis and policy implications. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 69, 299–314.Google Scholar
  64. Lazarus, R. S. (1995). Psychological stress in the workplace. In R. Crandall & P. L. Perrewé (Eds.), Occupational stress: A handbook (pp. 3–14). Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  65. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  66. Lehner, M., Mont, O., & Heiskanen, E. (2016). Nudging – A promising tool for sustainable consumption behaviour? Journal of Cleaner Production, 134(A), 166–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lieven, T., Mühlmeier, S., Henkel, S., & Waller, J. F. (2011). Who will buy electric cars? An empirical study in Germany. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16, 236–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Luettringhaus, H., & Nilsson, M. (2012). ELVIRE approaches to mitigate EV driver’s range anxiety – Technical paper by ELVIRE – European research project on ICT for electric vehicles. In Proceedings of 19th ITS world congress, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  69. Lundström, A., & Bogdan, C. (2012). COPE1 – Taking control over EV range. In Adjunct proceedings of the 4th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications (AutomotiveUI’12), Portsmouth, NH, pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
  70. McCollum, D., Krey, V., Kolp, P., Nagai, Y., & Riahi, K. (2014). Transport electrification: A key element for energy system transformation and climate stabilization. Climatic Change, 123, 651–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. McIlroy, R. C., Stanton, N. A., & Harvey, C. (2014). Getting drivers to do the right thing: A review of the potential for safely reducing energy consumption through design. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 8, 388–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. McManus, M. C. (2012). Environmental consequences of the use of batteries in low carbon systems: The impact of battery production. Applied Energy, 93, 288–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Moons, I., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2012). Emotions as determinants of electric car usage intention. Journal of Marketing Management, 28, 195–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nayum, A., Klöckner, C. A., & Mehmetoglu, M. (2016). Comparison of socio-psychological characteristics of conventional and battery electric car buyers. Travel Behaviour and Society, 3, 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Neaimeh, M., Hill, G. A., Hübner, Y., & Blythe, P. T. (2013). Routing systems to extend the driving range of electric vehicles. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 7, 327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Neubauer, J., & Wood, E. (2014). The impact of range anxiety and home, workplace, and public charging infrastructure on simulated battery electric vehicle lifetime utility. Journal of Power Sources, 257, 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Neumann, I., Franke, T., Cocron, P., Bühler, F., & Krems, J. F. (2015). Eco-driving strategies in battery electric vehicle use – How do drivers adapt over time? IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 9, 746–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Nilsson, M. (2011a). Electric vehicles – An interview study investigating the phenomenon of range anxiety. Retrieved February 14, 2017, from http://e-mobility-nsr.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/info-pool/report_result_interview_elvire.pdf
  79. Nilsson, M. (2011b). Electric vehicle: The phenomenon of range anxiety. Retrieved from http://e-mobility-nsr.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/info-pool/the_phenomenon_of_range_anxiety_elvire.pdf
  80. Noppers, E. H., Keizer, K., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2014). The adoption of sustainable innovations: Driven by symbolic and environmental motives. Global Environmental Change, 25, 52–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ozaki, R., & Sevastyanova, K. (2011). Going hybrid: An analysis of consumer purchase motivations. Energy Policy, 39, 2217–2227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pathak, S. K., Sood, V., Singh, Y., & Channiwala, S. A. (2016). Real world vehicle emissions: Their correlation with driving parameters. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 44, 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Peters, A., & Dütschke, E. (2014). How do consumers perceive electric vehicles? A comparison of German consumer groups. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 16, 359–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pettersson, S. (2013). ELVIIS – Final report to Göteborg Energi Forskningsstiftelse, ICT Sweden Viktoria. Retrieved February 14, 2017, from https://www.viktoria.se/sites/default/files/pub/www.viktoria.se/upload/publications/elviis_final.pdf
  85. Philipsen, R., Schmidt, T., & Ziefle, M. (2015). A charging place to be – Users’ evaluation criteria for the positioning of fast-charging infrastructure for electro mobility. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2792–2799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Pietzcker, R. C., Longden, T., Chen, W., Fu, S., Kriegler, E., Kyle, P., et al. (2014). Long-term transport energy demand and climate policy: Alternative visions on transport decarbonization in energy-economy models. Energy, 64, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Rahmati, A., Qian, A., & Zhong, L. (2007). Understanding human-battery interaction on mobile phones. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, Innsbruck, Austria, pp. 265–272.Google Scholar
  88. Rahmati, A., & Zhong, L. (2009). Human-battery interaction on mobile phones. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 5, 465–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rauh, N., Franke, T., & Krems, J. F. (2015a). Understanding the impact of electric vehicle driving experience on range anxiety. Human Factors, 57, 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rauh, N., Franke, T., & Krems, J. F. (2015b). User experience with electric vehicles while driving in a critical range situation – A qualitative approach. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 9, 734–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rauh, N., Franke, T., & Krems, J. F. (2017). First-time experience of critical range situations in BEV use and the positive effect of coping information. Transportation Research Part F, 44, 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., & Bodin, J. (2015). Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 34, 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Riga, D. (2015). Hybrid electric vehicles: Driving towards sustainability. Unpublished master thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.Google Scholar
  94. Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  95. Schmalfuß, F., Kreußlein, M., Döbelt, S., Kämpfe, B., Wüstemann, R., Mair, C., et al. (2016). Smart charging systems as one solution to overcome grid stability problems in the future? A field study for examining the BEV user acceptance of a smart charging system. In European conference on human centred design intelligent transport system, pp. 114–124. Retrieved February 14, 2017, from http://conference2016.humanist-vce.eu/Proceedings/session-4.pdf
  96. Schmalfuß, F., Kreußlein, M., Mair, C., Döbelt, S., Heller, C., Wüstemann, R., et al. (2017). Smart charging in daily routine – Expectations, experiences and preferences of potential users. In J. Liebl (Ed.), Grid integration of electric mobility – 1st international ATZ conference 2016. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Vieweg.Google Scholar
  97. Schmalfuß, F., Mair, C., Döbelt, S., Kämpfe, B., Wüstemann, R., Krems, J. F., et al. (2015). User responses to a smart charging system in Germany: Battery electric vehicle driver motivation, attitudes and acceptance. Energy Research & Social Science, 9, 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Schmalfuß, F., Mühl, K., & Krems, J. F. (2017). Direct experience with battery electric vehicles (BEVs) matters when evaluating vehicle attributes, attitude and purchase intention. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 46(A), 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Schmitz, M., Maag, C., Jagiellowicz, M., & Hanig, M. (2013). Impact of a combined accelerator-brake pedal solution on efficient driving. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 7, 203–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 39–49.Google Scholar
  101. Schwartz, S. H., & Howard, J. A. (1981). A normative decision-making model of altruism. In J. P. Rushton & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior (pp. 189–211). Hillsdale, MI: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  102. Seeking Alpha. (2013, August 1). Beyond RA: The EV’s next challenge. Retrieved February 14, 2017, from http://seekingalpha.com/article/1595562-beyond-range-anxiety-the-evs-next-challenge?
  103. Sierzchula, W., Bakker, S., Maat, K., & van Wee, B. (2014). The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy, 68, 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Sivak, M., & Schoettle, B. (2012). Eco-driving: Strategic, tactical, and operational decisions of the driver that influence vehicle fuel economy. Transport Policy, 22, 96–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Stillwater, T., & Kurani, K. S. (2013). Drivers discuss ecodriving feedback: Goal setting, framing, and anchoring motivate new behaviors. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 19, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Summala, H. (2007). Towards understanding motivational and emotional factors in driver behaviour: Comfort through satisficing. In C. Cacciabue (Ed.), Modelling driver behaviour in automotive environments (pp. 189–207). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tate, E. D., Harpster, M. O., & Savagian, P. J. (2008). The electrification of the automobile: From conventional hybrid, to plug-in hybrids, to extended-range electric vehicles. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars – Electronic and Electrical Systems, 1(1), 156–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Thatcher, A. (2013). Green ergonomics: Definition and scope. Ergonomics, 56, 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Turrentine, T., Garas, D., Lentz, A., & Woodjack, J. (2011). The UC Davis MINI E consumer study. Report no. UCD-ITS-RR-11-05. Davis, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
  110. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425–478.Google Scholar
  111. Vilimek, R., Keinath, A., & Schwalm, M. (2012). The MINI E field study – Similarities and differences in international everyday EV driving. In N. A. Stanton (Ed.), Advances in human aspects of road and rail transportation (pp. 363–372). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  112. Walsh, C., Carroll, S., Eastlake, A., & Blythe, P. (2010). Electric vehicle driving style and duty variation performance study. Retrieved February 14, 2017, from http://www.cenex.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Electric-vehicle-driver-and-duty-variation-performance-study1.pdf
  113. Weiss, C., Mallig, N., Heilig, M., Schneidereit, T., Franke, T., & Vortisch, P. (2016). How much range is required? A model based analysis of potential battery electric vehicle usage. In Transportation Research Board (Ed.), TRB 95th annual meeting compendium of papers.Google Scholar
  114. Wikström, M., Hansson, L., & Alvfors, P. (2014). Socio-technical experiences from electric vehicle utilisation in commercial fleets. Applied Energy, 123, 82–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Yilmaz, M., & Krein, P. T. (2013). Review of battery charger topologies, charging power levels, and infrastructure for plug-in electric and hybrid vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 28, 2151–2169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Young, M. S., Birrell, S. A., & Stanton, N. A. (2011). Safe driving in a green world: A review of driver performance benchmarks and technologies to support “smart” driving. Applied Ergonomics, 42, 533–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Yuan, X., Li, L., Gou, H., & Dong, T. (2015). Energy and environmental impact of battery electric vehicle range in China. Applied Energy, 157, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Zhang, Y., Wang, W., Kobayashi, Y., & Shirai, K. (2012). Remaining driving range estimation of electric vehicle. In IEEE international electric vehicle conference (pp. 95–101). Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.Google Scholar
  119. Ziegler, A. (2012). Individual characteristics and stated preferences for alternative energy sources and propulsion technologies in vehicles: A discrete choice analysis for Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46, 1372–1385.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Franke
    • 1
  • Franziska Schmalfuß
    • 2
  • Nadine Rauh
    • 2
  1. 1.Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, Institute for Multimedia and Interactive SystemsUniversity of LübeckLübeckGermany
  2. 2.Cognitive and Engineering PsychologyTechnische Universität ChemnitzChemnitzGermany

Personalised recommendations