Advertisement

Hydrothermal Process for Extracting Phosphate from Animal Manure

  • Huanhuan Li
  • Xueli Zhao
  • Tao ZhangEmail author
  • Andrea Kruse
Chapter

Abstract

To mitigate the risk of the secured supply of phosphate rock, increasing attention has been paid to phosphorus (P) recovery from untapped secondary resources. Animal manure is one of the most important secondary resources for P in light of the large quantity and high P content. This chapter describes the hydrothermal technology to efficiently extract P from animal manure. Laboratory experiments showed that the hydrothermal treatment of pig manure at 180 °C under the oxygen partial pressure of 1 MPa could increase the P extractability by approximately 150% compared to the untreated control. Under this condition, the concentration of P in the eluate reached up to 114 mg/L. The kinetics of extracting P from pig manure by the hydrothermal technology could be given by the first-order reaction equation.

Keywords

Hydrothermal treatment Animal manure P extraction kinetics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by a grant from the National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFD0501404-6, 2017YFD0800202), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31401944), the China Agricultural University Education Foundation “Da Bei Nong Group Education Foundation” (No. 1031-2415005), and the Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (No. 6144026).

References

  1. Ajiboye B, Akinremi OO, Racz GJ (2004) Laboratory characterization of phosphorus in fresh and oven-dried organic amendments. J Environ Qual 33(3):1062–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angst TE, Sohi SP (2013) Establishing release dynamics for plant nutrients from biochar. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy 5(2):221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azuara M, Kersten SRA, Kootstra AMJ (2013) Recycling phosphorus by fast pyrolysis of pig manure: concentration and extraction of phosphorus combined with formation of value-added pyrolysis products. Biomass Bioenergy 49(2):171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cao W, Cao C, Guo L, Jin H, Dargusch M, Bernhardt D et al (2016) Hydrogen production from supercritical water gasification of chicken manure. Int J Hydrog Energy 41(48):22722–22731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Catalkopru AK, Kantarli IC, Yanik J (2016) Effects of spent liquor recirculation in hydrothermal carbonization. Bioresour Technol 226:89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dael MV, Márquez N, Reumerman P, Pelkmans L, Kuppens T, Passel SV (2014) Development and techno-economic evaluation of a biorefinery based on biomass (waste) streams – case study in the netherlands. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 8(5):635–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dai L, Tan F, Bo W, He M, Wang W, Tang X et al (2015) Immobilization of phosphorus in cow manure during hydrothermal carbonization. J Environ Manag 157:49–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dou Z, Toth JD, Galligan DT, Ramberg CFJ, Ferguson JD (2000) Laboratory procedures for characterizing manure phosphorus. J Environ Qual 29(2):508–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eftaxias A, Font J, Fortuny A, Giralt J, Fabregat A, Stüber F (2014) Kinetic modelling of catalytic wet air oxidation of phenol by simulated annealing. Int J Chem React Eng 33(1):175–190Google Scholar
  10. Ekpo U, Ross AB, Camargo-Valero MA, Fletcher LA (2016) Influence of ph on hydrothermal treatment of swine manure: impact on extraction of nitrogen and phosphorus in process water. Bioresour Technol 214:637–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fang C, Tao Z, Jiang R, Ohtake H (2016) Phosphate enhance recovery from wastewater by mechanism analysis and optimization of struvite settleability in fluidized bed reactor. Sci Rep 6:32215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. FAO (2015) FAOSTAT. Available online at http://www.fao.org/statistics/en/. Verified on 20 Sept 2016
  13. Ghanim BM, Kwapinski W, Leahy JJ (2017) Hydrothermal carbonisation of poultry litter: effects of initial ph on yields and chemical properties of hydrochars. Bioresour Technol 238:78–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. He Z, Honeycutt CW (2001) Enzymatic characterization of organic phosphorus in animal manure. J Environ Qual 30(5):1685–1692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. He Z, Griffin TS, Honeycutt CW (2004a) Phosphorus distribution in dairy manures. J Environ Qual 33(4):1528–1534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. He Z, Griffin TS, Honeycutt CW (2004b) Enzymatic hydrolysis of organic phosphorus in swine manure and soil. J Environ Qual 33(1):367–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heilmann SM, Molde JS, Timler JG, Wood BM, Mikula AL, Vozhdayev GV et al (2014) Phosphorus reclamation through hydrothermal carbonization of animal manures. Environ Sci Technol 48(17):10323–10329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kauwenbergh SJV, Stewart M, Mikkelsen R (2013) World reserves of phosphate rock. a dynamic and unfolding story. Better Crops Plant Food 97:18–20Google Scholar
  19. Kruse A (2008) Supercritical water gasification. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 2(5):415–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2015) Biochar for environmental management. Sci Technol Earthscan 25(1):15801–15811(11)Google Scholar
  21. Li G, Li H, Leffelaar PA, Shen J, Zhang F (2014) Characterization of phosphorus in animal manures collected from three (dairy, swine, and broiler) farms in China. PLoS One 9(7):e102698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu Y, Yao S, Wang Y, Lu H, Brar SK, Yang S (2017) Bio- and hydrochars from rice straw and pig manure: inter-comparison. Bioresour Technol 235:332–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mcdowell RW, Stewart I (2005) Phosphorus in fresh and dry dung of grazing dairy cattle, deer, and sheep: sequential fraction and phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance analyses. J Environ Qual 34(2):598–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Modell M (1985) Gasification and liquefaction of forest products in supercritical water. Fundamentals of thermochemical biomass conversion. Springer, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  25. Monreal CM, Schnitzer MI (2012) Bio-oil production from poultry litter: potential energy, environmental and chemical opportunities. Applied research of animal manure. Challenges and opportunities beyond the adverse environmental concernsGoogle Scholar
  26. Pagliari PH, Laboski CAM (2012) Investigation of the inorganic and organic phosphorus forms in animal manure. J Environ Qual 41(3):901–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pagliari PH, Laboski CAM (2013) Dairy manure treatment effects on manure phosphorus fractionation and changes in soil test phosphorus. Biol Fertil Soils 49(8):987–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pagliari P, Rosen C, Strock J, Russelle M (2010) Phosphorus availability and early corn growth response in soil amended with turkey manure ash. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 41(11):1369–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sharpley A, Moyer B (2000) Phosphorus forms in manure and compost and their release during simulated rainfall. J Environ Qual 29(6):1462–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Szogi AA, Vanotti MB (2009) Prospects for phosphorus recovery from poultry litter. Bioresour Technol 100(22):5461–5465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tembhekar PD, Padoley KV, Mudliar SL, Mudliar SN (2015) Kinetics of wet air oxidation pretreatment and biodegradability enhancement of a complex industrial wastewater. J Environ Chem Eng 3(1):339–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Theegala CS, Midgett JS (2012) Hydrothermal liquefaction of separated dairy manure for production of bio-oils with simultaneous waste treatment. Bioresour Technol 107(2):456–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Toufiq Reza M, Freitas A, Yang X, Hiibel S, Lin H, Coronella CJ (2016) Hydrothermal carbonization (htc) of cow manure: carbon and nitrogen distributions in htc products. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 35(4):1002–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tsai WT, Liu SC (2015) Thermochemical characterization of cattle manure relevant to its energy conversion and environmental implications. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 6(1):1–7Google Scholar
  35. Wnetrzak R, Kwapinski W, Peters K, Sommer SG, Jensen LS, Leahy JJ (2013) The influence of the pig manure separation system on the energy production potentials. Bioresour Technol 136(136C):502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhongqi HE, Pagliari PH, Waldrip HM (2016) Applied and environmental chemistry of animal manure: a review. Pedosphere 26(6):779–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huanhuan Li
    • 1
  • Xueli Zhao
    • 2
  • Tao Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andrea Kruse
    • 2
  1. 1.Beijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, Key Laboratory of Plant-Soil Interactions of Ministry of Education, College of Resources and Environmental SciencesChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Institute for Agricultural EngineeringUniversity of HohenheimStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations