• Hyesun Cho


This chapter describes both individual and collective transformations of bilingual preservice teachers during and after the program. In this chapter, I first define the notion of transformation used in this study. I then illustrate the transformative processes which individual CLEAR scholars underwent during and after their participation in the program. Also, I describe the experiences of the instructors in relation to reflexive and critical teaching practices as a result of interaction with the CLEAR students. Finally, I conclude with the possibilities of transformation for bilingual preservice teachers as a lifelong journey.


  1. Abasi, A. R., Akbari, N., & Graves, B. (2006). Discourse appropriation, construction of identities, and the complex issue of plagiarism: ESL students writing in graduate school. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 102–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreotti, V. (2007). An ethical engagement with the other: Spivak’s ideas on education. Critical Literacy: Theories and Practices, 1(1), 69–79.Google Scholar
  3. Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/La Frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Spinsters/Aunt Lute Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
  5. Bhabha, H. (1990). The third space: Interview with Homi Bhabha. In Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 207–221).Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Byean, H. (2015). English, tracking, and neoliberalization of education in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 867–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cho, H. (2011). Transformation and agency: Participatory action research with bilingual undergraduates. In K. Davis (Ed.), Critical qualitative research in second language studies: Agency and advocacy (pp. 297–329). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Cho, H. (2014). Enacting critical literacy: The case of language minority preservice teacher. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(5), 677–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, K. A. (2009). Agentive youth research: Towards individual, collective, and policy transformations. In T. G. Wiley, J. S. Lee, & R. Rumberger (Eds.), The education of language minority immigrants in the United States. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  11. Duncan-Andrade, J. M. R., & Morrell, E. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy: Possibilities for moving from theory to practice in urban schools. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  12. Fine, M. (1998). Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (pp. 130–155). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  14. Hicks, D. (2000). Self and other in Bakhtin’s early philosophical essays: Prelude to a theory of prose consciousness. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7, 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Lather, P. (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56(3), 257–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewis, C. (2001). Literary practices as social acts: Power, status, and cultural norms in the classroom. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Lewison, M., Leland, C., & Harste, J. (2015). Creating critical classrooms: Reading and writing with an edge. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Lin, A. M. Y., & Luk, J. C. M. (2005). Local creativity in the face of global domination: Insights of Bakhtin for teaching English for dialogic communication. In J. K. Hall, G. Vitanova, & L. Marchenkova (Eds.), Dialogue with Bakhtin on second and foreign language learning: New perspectives (pp. 77–98). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2003). Ethics: The failure of positivist science. In Y. S. Lincoln & N. K. Denzin (Eds.), Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief (pp. 219–238). Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  21. Maum, R. (2002). Nonnative-English-speaking teachers in the English teaching profession. ERIC Digest.Google Scholar
  22. May, S., & Sleeter, C. E. (Eds.). (2010). Critical multiculturalism: Theory and praxis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Moll, L., & Rubinstein-Avila, E. (2007). Commentary. In C. Lewis, P. Enciso, & E. Moje (Eds.), Reframing sociocultural research on literacy: Identity, agency, and power (pp. 189–195). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  24. Morrell, E. (2015). Critical literacy and urban youth: Pedagogies of access, dissent, and liberation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Park, J. S. Y., & Lo, A. (2012). Transnational South Korea as a site for a sociolinguistics of globalization: Markets, timescales, neoliberalism. Journal of SocioLinguistics, 16(2), 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ruiz, R. (1997). The empowerment of language-minority students. In A. Darder, R. D. Torres, & H. Gutierrez (Eds.), Latinos and education (pp. 319–328). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Tew, J. (2002). Social theory, power, and practice. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vitanova, G. (2005). Authoring the self in a non-native language: A dialogic approach to agency and subjectivity. In J. K. Hall, G. Vitanova, & L. Marchenkova (Eds.), Dialogue with Bakhtin on second and foreign language learning (pp. 149–169). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyesun Cho
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Curriculum and TeachingThe University of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations