Advertisement

Iris Recognition Through Score-Level Fusion

  • Ritesh Vyas
  • Tirupathiraju Kanumuri
  • Gyanendra Sheoran
  • Pawan Dubey
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 703)

Abstract

Although there are many iris recognition approaches available in the literature, there is a trade-off as which approach is giving the most reliable authentication. In this paper, score-level fusion of two different approaches, XOR-SUM Code and BLPOC, is used to achieve better performance than either approach individually. Different fusion strategies are employed to investigate the effect of fusion on genuine acceptance rate (GAR). It is observed that fusion through sum and product schemes provides better result than that through minimum and maximum schemes. For further improvement, sum and product schemes are more explored through weighted sum with different weights. The best GAR and equal error rate (EER) values are 98.83% and 0.95%, respectively. Performance of proposed score-level fusion is also compared with existing approaches.

Keywords

Iris recognition Score-level fusion Genuine acceptance rate (GAR) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Indian Institute of Technology Delhi for providing free access to their iris database.

References

  1. 1.
    Bansal, M., Hanmandlu, M., Kumar, P.: IRIS based authentication using local principal independent components. Optik (Stuttg). 127, 4808–4814 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bowyer, K.W., Hollingsworth, K., Flynn, P.J.: Image understanding for iris biometrics: A survey. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 110(2), 281–307 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daugman, J.: High Conf Visual Recog of Persons by a test of statistical significance. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 15(11), 1148–1161 (1993)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daugman, J.: Demodulation By Complex-Valued Wavelets for Stochastic Pattern Recognition. Int. J. Wavelets, Multiresolution Inf. Process. 01(1), 1–17 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daugman, J.: How iris recognition works. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. IEEE Trans. 14(1), 21–30 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dhage, S.S., Hegde, S.S., Manikantan, K., Ramachandran, S.: DWT-based Feature Extraction and Radon Transform Based Contrast Enhancement for Improved Iris Recognition. In: Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Technol. Appl. vol. 45, pp. 256–265 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Farouk, R.M.: Iris recognition based on elastic graph matching and Gabor wavelets. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 115(8), 1239–1244 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khalighi, S., Pak, F., Tirdad, P., Nunes, U.: Iris Recognition using Robust Localization and Nonsubsampled Contourlet Based Features. J. Signal Process. Syst. 81(1), 111–128 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kumar, A., Passi, A.: Comparison and combination of iris matchers for reliable personal authentication. Pattern Recognit. 43, 1016–1026 (2010), http://www4.comp.polyu.edu.hk/~csajaykr/IITD/Database_Iris.htm
  10. 10.
    Masek, L., Kovesi, P.: MATLAB Source Code for a Biometric Identification System Based on Iris Patterns (2003), http://www.peterkovesi.com/studentprojects/libor/sourcecode.html
  11. 11.
    Miyazawa, K., Ito, K., Aoki, T., Kobayashi, K., Nakajima, H.: An effective approach for Iris recognition using phase-based image matching. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 30(10), 1741–1756 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Park, H.A., Park, K.R.: Iris recognition based on score level fusion by using SVM. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 28(15), 2019–2028 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rai, H., Yadav, A.: Iris recognition using combined support vector machine and Hamming distance approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(2), 588–593 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sankar, S., Majhi, B., Sa, P.K.: Region based feature extraction from non-cooperative iris images using triplet half-band fi lter bank. Opt. Laser Technol. 72, 6–14 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tamrakar, D., Khanna, P.: Palmprint verification with XOR-SUM Code. Signal, Image Video Process. 9(3), 535–542 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Umer, S., Dhara, B.C., Chanda, B.: Iris recognition using multiscale morphologic features. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 65, 67–74 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Umer, S., Dhara, B.C., Chanda, B.: Texture code matrix-based multi-instance iris recognition. Pattern Anal. Appl. 19(1), 283–295 (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vyas, R., Kanumuri, T., Sheoran, G.: An Approach for iris segmentation in constrained environments. In: Panigrahi, B.K., Hoda, M.N., Sharma, V., and Goel, S. (eds.) Nature Inspired Computing (Proceedings of CSI 2015), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 652. pp. 99–107. Springer Singapore (2018)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vyas, R., Kanumuri, T., Sheoran, G.: Iris Recognition using 2-D Gabor Filter and XOR-SUM Code. In: 2016 1st India International Conference on Information Processing (IICIP), pp. 1–5 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/IICIP.2016.7975369
  20. 20.
    Wildes, R.: Iris recognition: an emerging biometric technology. Proc. IEEE 85(9), 1348–1363 (1997)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ritesh Vyas
    • 1
  • Tirupathiraju Kanumuri
    • 1
  • Gyanendra Sheoran
    • 1
  • Pawan Dubey
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of Technology DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations