Advertisement

The Everyday Life of Mostar

  • Giulia Carabelli
Chapter
Part of the The Contemporary City book series (TCONTCI)

Abstract

This chapter explores the everyday of Mostar to discuss empirically and conceptually how the ethnic division is constantly negotiated and reinvented. Merging data and experience from the author’s fieldwork, the chapter accounts for the practice of meeting up for coffee as one of the main characteristics of Mostar’s everyday life where (often) contested narratives of ethno-national belonging emerge. By highlighting the fluidity of the everyday, this chapter discusses how the totalising ideal of ethno-national subjectivity is negotiated and reinterpreted, which reveals the possibility of transformative politics within quotidian practices as potential spaces of resistance.

References

  1. Abart. 2011. (Re)collecting Mostar. Online Archive. http://abartarhiv.blogspot.de. Accessed October 26, 2017.
  2. Aceska, Ana. 2016. “Our Side, Their Side and All Those Places In-between: Neutrality and Place in a Divided City.” In Politics of Identity in Post-conflict States. The Bosnian and Irish Experience, edited by Éamonn Ó. Ciardha and Gabriela Vojvoda, 107–116. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Barthes, Roland. 1977. Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berlant, Lauren. 2007. “Slow Death (Sovereignty, Obesity, Lateral Agency).” Critical Inquiry 33 (4): 754–780. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/521568.
  5. ———. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2015a. “A Momentary Anaesthesia of the Heart.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 28 (3): 273–281.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-014-9194-7.
  7. ———. 2015b. “Structures of Unfeeling: Mysterious Skin.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 28 (3): 191–213.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-014-9190-y.
  8. Brubaker, Roger. 2002. “Ethnicity without Groups.” Archives of European Sociology XLIII (2): 163–189.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975602001066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castells, Manuel. 1983. The City and the Grassroots: A Cross-Cultural Theory of Urban Social Movements. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Carabelli, Giulia. 2013. “Living (Critically) in the Present: Youth Activism in Mostar (Bosnia Herzegovina).” European Perspectives – Journal on European Perspectives of the Western Balkans 5 (1): 48–63.Google Scholar
  11. Cooper, Davina. 2014. Everyday Utopias. The Conceptual Life of Promising Spaces. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, Heather, and Paige Sarlin. 2011. “‘On the Risk of a New Relationality’: An Interview with Lauren Berlant and Michael Hardt.” Reviews in Cultural Theory (2.3). Online Publication. http://reviewsinculture.com/2012/10/15/on-the-risk-of-a-new-relationality-an-interview-with-lauren-berlant-and-michael-hardt/. Accessed October 27, 2017.
  13. D’Alessio, Vanni, and Eric Gobetti. 2009. “Politics of Identity and Symbolism in Postwar Mostar (1996–2005).” Paper Presented at the COST Action IS803, Nicosia, April 14–15, 2009.Google Scholar
  14. Dewsbury, John David, Paul Harrison, Mitch Rose, and John Wylie. 2002. “Enacting Geographies.” Geoforum 33 (4): 437–440.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(02)00029-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duschinsky, Robbie, and Emma Wilson. 2015. “Flat Affect, Joyful Politics and Enthralled Attachments: Engaging with the Work of Lauren Berlant.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 28 (3): 179–190.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-014-9189-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elden, Stuart. 2004. Understanding Henri Lefebvre: Theory and the Possible. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  17. Ffrench, Patrick. 2004. “A Different Life? Barthes, Foucault and Everyday Life.” Cultural Studies 18 (2/3): 290–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950238042000201527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flatley, Jonathan. 2008. Affective Mapping: Melancholia and the Politics of Modernism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grbavac, Ivana. 2015. “Linguistic Landscaping as an RST Research Method: The Downfall of Language Policies in Post-war Context.” European Journal of Applied Linguistics 3 (1): 87–110.  https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2015-0005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hardt, Michael. 2015. “The Power to be Affected.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 28 (3): 215–222.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-014-9191-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hromadžić, Azra. 2013. “Discourses of Trans-ethnic Narod in Postwar Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity 41 (2): 259–275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2012.747503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ———. 2015a. Citizens of an Empty Nation. Youth and State-Making in Postwar Bosnia-Herzegovina. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2015b. “On Not Dating Just Anybody: The Politics of Flirting in a Post-war City.” Anthropological Quarterly 88 (4): 881–906.  https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2015.0050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jozić, Želiko. 2012. “Linguistic (Un)reality in Contemporary Bosnia and Herzegovina.” In Balkan Encounters: Old and New Identities in South-East Europe, edited by Jouko Lindstedt and Max Wahlström, 33–46. Helsinki: The University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
  25. Katznelson, Ira. 1992. Marxism and the City. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kolakowski, Leszek. 1981. Main Currents of Marxism. Volume 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kolind, Torsten. 2007. “In Search for ‘Decent People’: Resistance to the Ethnicization of Everyday Life Among the Muslims of Stolac.” In The New Bosnian Mosaic, edited by Xavier Bougarel, Elissa Helms, and Ger Duijzings, 123–138. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  28. Laketa, Sunčana. 2015a. “The Geopolitics of Daily Life in Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina.” PhD diss., University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2015b. “Youth as Geopolitical Subjects: The Case of Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina.” In Politics, Citizenship and Right, edited by K. Kallio, S. Mills, and T. Skelton, 1–13. Online: Springer. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-981-4585-94-1_6-1#page-1. Accessed October 18, 2017.
  30. ———. 2017. “Between ‘This’ Side and ‘That’ Side: On Performativity, Youth Identities and ‘Sticky’ Spaces.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. Advanced Online Publication, August 2, 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775817723632.
  31. Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Maiden, Oxford and Victoria: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 2007. Everyday Life in the Modern World. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 2008a. Critique of Everyday Life. Volume 1. Foundations for a Sociology of the Everyday. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 2008b. Critique of Everyday Life. Volume 2. Foundations for a Sociology of the Everyday. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 2014. Towards an Architecture of Enjoyment. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lefebvre, Henri, and Christine Levich. 1987. “The Everyday and Everydayness.” Yale French Studies 73: 7–11. http://doi.org/10.2307/2930193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lorimer, Hayden. 2005. “Cultural Geography: The Busyness of Being ‘More-than-Representational’.” Progress in Human Geography 29 (1): 83–94.  https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph531pr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Makaš, Emily. 2007. “Representing Competing Identities in Postwar Mostar.” PhD diss., Cornell University.Google Scholar
  39. Marx, Karl. 2007. Capital. Volume I. New York: Cosimo Inc.Google Scholar
  40. Merrifield, Andrew. 1993. “Place and Space: A Lefebvrian Reconciliation.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 18 (4): 516–531. http://doi.org/10.2307/622564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Palmberger, Monika. 2012. “Renaming of Public Space: A Policy of Exclusion in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Max Planck Institute for the Study of Ethnic and Religious Diversity Working Paper Series. February 2012. https://docgo.org/max-planck-institute-for-the-study-of. Accessed October 25, 2017.
  42. ———. 2013. “Ruptured Pasts and Captured Futures: Life Narratives in Postwar Mostar.” Focaal-Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology 66: 14–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2013.660102.
  43. ———. 2016. How Generations Remember. Conflicting Histories and Shared Memories in Post-War Bosnia and Herzegovina. Open Access. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057%2F978-1-137-45063-0.
  44. Simmons, Cynthia. 2005. Women Engaged/Engaged Art in Postwar Bosnia: Reconcialiation, Recovery and Civil Society. The Carl Beck Papers in Russian and East European Studies. Online.  https://doi.org/10.5195/cbp.2010.150.Google Scholar
  45. Stanek, Lukas. 2011. Henri Lefebvre on Space. Architecture, Urban research, and the Production of Theory. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  46. Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. 2005. Friction: an ethnography of global connection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for the Study of Ethnic and Religious DiversityGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations