Advertisement

How Do Dynamic Capabilities Drive Adoptive Management Innovation?

  • Haifen Lin
Chapter

Abstract

Management innovation facilitates changes including technical innovation thus improving organizational performance; Chinese firms typically adopt these management innovations. Building on previous research of how and why management innovation occurs, this chapter measures the influence of four dynamic capabilities on four stages of the innovation process. This chapter surveys 264 Chinese firms and analyzes results through PLS-SEM. The findings indicate that relational capability facilitates sensing capability, absorptive capacity, and integrative capability. Further, all of these dynamic capabilities affect stages of the adoptive management innovation process; from initiation through to implementation. As innovation results can be intangible and lagging, and consequently difficult to measure, the method offers managers an alternative by monitoring the effects of different capabilities at each stage of the adoptive management innovation process.

References

  1. Adler, P., Kwon, S.: Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Acad. Manag. Rev. 27(1), 17–40 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C., Collier, N.: Dynamic capabilities: an exploration of how firms renew their resource base. Br.J. Manag. 20(Supplement s1), S9–S24 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. Aragón-Correa, J.A., Sharma, S.: A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Acad. Manag. Rev. 28(1), 71–88 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. Armbruster, H., Bikfalvi, A., Kinkel, S., Lay, G.: Organizational innovation: the challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys. Technovation 28(10), 644–657 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balbastre, F., Moreno-Luzón, M.: Self-assessment application and learning in organizations: a special reference to the ontological dimension. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 14(3), 367–388 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barney, J.B.: Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17(1), 99–120 (1991)Google Scholar
  7. Barreto, I.: Dynamic capabilities: a review of past research and an agenda for the future. J. Manag. 36(1), 256–280 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. Baum, J.A.C., Oliver, C.: Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Adm. Sci. Q. 36(3), 187–218 (1991)Google Scholar
  9. Bazerman, M.: Judgment in Managerial Decision Making. Wiley, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  10. Birkinshaw, J., Crainer, S., Mol, M.: Special report on management innovation. Bus. Strategy Rev. 18(1), 45–73 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., Mol, M.J.: Management innovation. Acad. Manag. Rev. 33(4) (2008)Google Scholar
  12. Brady, T., Davies, A.: Building project capabilities: from exploratory to exploitative learning. Organiz. Stud. 25(9), 1601–1621 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brass, D.J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H.R., Tsai, W.: Taking stock of networks and organizations: a multilevel perspective. Acad. Manag. J. 47(6), 795–817 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Busenitz, L.W., Lau, C.M.: A cross-cultural cognitive model of new venture creation. Entrep. Theory Pract. 20(4), 25–39 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Capaldo, A.: Network structure and innovation: the leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability. Strateg. Manag. J. 28(6), 585–608 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Casson, M., Godley, A.: Revisiting the emergence of the modern business enterprise: entrepreneurship and the singer global distribution system. J. Manage. Stud. 44(7), 1064–1077 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheng, C.C.J., Chen, J.S.: Breakthrough innovation: the roles of dynamic innovation capabilities and open innovation activities. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 28(5), 444–454 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clausen, T.H.: The role of operational and dynamic capabilities in ambidextrous innovation: a longitudinal analysis. 35th DRUID Celebration Conference, Barcelona, Spain, 17–19 June 2013Google Scholar
  19. Cohen, M.D., Bacdayan, P.: Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: evidence from a laboratory study. Organ. Sci. 5(4), 554–568 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A.: Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 35(1), 128–152 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Collis, D.J.: How valuable are organizational capabilities? Strateg. Manag. J. 15(8), 143–152 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cooper, A.C., Folta, T.B., Woo, C.Y.: Entrepreneurial information search. J. Bus. Ventur. 10(2), 107–120 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Daily, C.M., Mcdougall, P.P., Covin, J.G., Dan, D.R.: Governance and strategic leadership in entrepreneurial firms. J. Manag. 28(3), 387–412 (2002)Google Scholar
  24. Davenport, T., Leibold, M., Voelpel, S.: Strategic Management in The Innovation Economy, Strategy Approaches and Tools for Dynamic Innovation Capabilities. Wiley, New York, NY (2006)Google Scholar
  25. De Carolis, D.M., Saparito, P.: Social capital, cognition, and entrepreneurial opportunities: a theoretical framework. Entrep. Theory Pract. 30(1), 41–56 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. DiMaggio, P.J., Powell, W.W.: The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48(2), 147–160 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eisenhardt, K., Martin, J.: Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg. Manag. J. 21(10–11), 1105–1121 (2000)Google Scholar
  28. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Foss, K., Foss, N.J., Klein, P.G., Klein, S.K.: The entrepreneurial organization of heterogeneous capital. J. Manage. Stud. 44(7), 1165–1186 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Foss, N.J.: The theory of the firm: the Austrians as precursors and critics of contemporary theory. Rev. Austrian Econ. 7(1), 31–65 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., Chesbrough, H.: The future of open innovation. R&D Manag. 40(3), 213–221 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gebauer, H.: Exploring the contribution of management innovation to the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Ind. Mark. Manage. 40(8), 1238–1250 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartsman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M.: The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. SAGE Publications (1994)Google Scholar
  34. Gimeno, J.: Competition within and between networks: the contingent effect of competitive embeddedness on alliance formation. Acad. Manag. J. 47(6), 820–842 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gioia, D.A., Chittipeddi, K.: Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strateg. Manag. J. 12(6), 433–448 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Granovetter, M.: Economic action and social structure: a theory of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91(3), 481–510 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Granovetter, M.S.: The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78(6), 1360–1380 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gudergan, S.P., Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Will, A.: Confirmatory tetrad analysis in PLS path modeling. J. Bus. Res. 61(12), 1238–1249 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Guillén, M.F.: Models of Management: Work, Authority, and Organization in a Comparative Perspective. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1994)Google Scholar
  40. Gulati, R., Gargiulo, M.: Where do interorganizational networks come from? Am. J. Sociol. 104(5), 1439–1458 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Mena, J.A.: An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 40(3), 414–433 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hair, J.F.J., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage, Thousand Oaks (2013)Google Scholar
  43. Hamel, G.: The why, what, and how of management innovation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 84(2), 72–84 (2006)Google Scholar
  44. Hart, S.L., Dowell, G.: A natural-resource-based view of the firm: fifteen years after. J. Manag. 37(5), 1464–1479 (2010)Google Scholar
  45. Helfat, C., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D.J., Winter, S.G.: Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Blackwell, Oxford, UK (2007)Google Scholar
  46. Helfat, C.E.: Knowpabilities: understanding strategic change in mobility accumulation: the case of R&D. Strateg. Manag. J. 18(5), 339–360 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Helfat, C.E., Peteraf, M.A.: The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strateg. Manag. J. 24(10), 997–1010 (2003)Google Scholar
  48. Helfat, C.E., Winter, S.G.: Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: strategy for the (n)ever-changing world. Strateg. Manag. J. 32(11), 1243–1250 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Henderson, R.M., Clark, K.B.: Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Adm. Sci. Q. 35(1), 9–30 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hertog, P.D., Aa, W.V.D., Jong, M.W.D.: Capabilities for managing service innovation: towards a conceptual framework. J. Serv. Manag. 21(4), 490–514 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ingram, P., Inman, C.: Institutions, intergroup competition, and the evolution of hotel populations around Niagara Falls. Adm. Sci. Q. 41(4), 629–658 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jansen, J.J.P., Bosch, F.A.J.V.D., Volberda, H.W.: Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter? Acad. Manag. J. 48(6), 999–1015 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Keister, L.A.: Engineering growth: business group structure and firm performance in China’s transition economy. Am. J. Sociol. 104(2), 404–440 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kim, L.: The dynamics of Samsung’s technological learning in semiconductor. Calif. Manag. Rev. 39(3), 86–100 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kirzner, I.M.: Competition and Entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL (1973)Google Scholar
  56. Kogut, B., Zander, U.: Knowledge of The Firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organiz. Sci. 3(3), 383–397 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kohlbacher, M.: The impact of dynamic capabilities through continuous improvement on innovation: the role of business process orientation. Knowl. Manag. 20(2), 71–76 (2013)Google Scholar
  58. Kor, Y.Y., Mahoney, J.T.: Edith Penrose's (1959) contributions to the resource-based view of strategic management. J. Manage. Stud. 41(1), 183–191 (2004) Google Scholar
  59. Kor, Y.Y., Mahoney, J.T., Michael, S.C.: Resources, capabilities and entrepreneurial perceptions. J. Manage. Stud. 44(7), 1187–1212 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Laursen, K., Salter, A.: Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strateg. Manag. J. 27(2), 131–150 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lazonick, W., Prencipe, A.: Dynamic capabilities and sustained innovation: strategic control and financial commitment at Rolls-Royce plc. Ind. Corp. Change 14(3), 501–542 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lewin, A.Y., Massini, S., Peeters, C.: Microfoundations of internal and external absorptive capacity routines. Organ. Sci. 22(1), 81–98 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Liao, J., Kickul, J.R., Ma, H.: Organizational dynamic capability and innovation: an empirical examination of internet firms. J. Small Bus. Manage. 47(3), 263–286 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lin, H.F., Su, J.Q.: Empirical research on the effect of dynamic capability on the process effectiveness of management innovation. Stud. Sci. Sci. 30(12), 1900–1909 (2012)Google Scholar
  65. Lin, H.F., Su, J.Q.: A case study on adoptive management innovation in China. J. Organiz. Change Manag. 27(1), 83–114 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lin, T.W.: Haier is higher. Strateg. Financ. (2009)Google Scholar
  67. Lorenzoni, G., Lipparini, A.: The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study. Strateg. Manag. J. 20(4), 317–338 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Luo, J.D., Sun, Y., Xie, C.X., He, S.S.: Phenomena of capable persons in the functioning of self-organization. Soc. Sci. China 10, 86–101 (2013)Google Scholar
  69. McGrath, H., O’Toole, T.: Implementing a relational capability framework through an SME network. International marketing and purchasing conference Uppsala University (2008)Google Scholar
  70. Mesquita, L.F., Anand, J., Brush, T.H.: Comparing The resource-base relational views: knowledge transfer and spillover in vertical alliances. Strateg. Manag. J. 29(9), 913–941 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mohr, J., Spekman, R.: Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strateg. Manag. J. 15(2), 135–152 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mol, M., Birkinshaw, J.: How management innovation happens. Mit Sloan Manag. Rev. 47(4), 81–88 (2006)Google Scholar
  73. Mol, M.J., Birkinshaw, J.: The sources of management innovation: when firms introduce new management practices. J. Bus. Res. 62(12), 1269–1280 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., Deshpande, R.: Relationships between providers and users of market research: the dynamics of trust within and between organizations. J. Mark. Res. 24(8), 314–328 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Nohria, N., Garcia-Pont, C.: Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strateg. Manag. J. 12(S1), 105–124 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. O’Connor, G.C.: Major innovation as a dynamic capability: a systems approach. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 25(4), 313–330 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Penrose, E.: Theory of The Growth of The Firm. Wiley, New York (1959)Google Scholar
  78. Podsakoff, P.M., Mackenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., Podsakoff, N.P.: Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(5), 879–903 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Powell, W.W.: Learning from collaboration: knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. Calif. Manag. Rev. 40(3), 228–240 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Reimann, M., Schilke, O., Thomas, J.S.: Customer relationship management and firm performance: the mediating role of business strategy. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 38(3), 326–346 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ridder, A.K.: Sensing and seizing open innovation: a capability-based approach. In: Paper Presented at the Dime-Druid Academy Winter Conference 2011 on Comwell Rebild Bakker. (2011)Google Scholar
  82. Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Will, A.: SmartPLS 2.0. University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany (2005)Google Scholar
  83. Romijn, H.: Enterprise development in developing countries: innovation or acquisition of technological capability? In: Van Djik, M.P., Sandee, H. (eds.) Innovation and Small Enterprises in the Third World. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2002)Google Scholar
  84. Rosenkopf, L., Nerkar, A.: Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strateg. Manag. J. 22(4), 287 (2001)Google Scholar
  85. Rumelt, R.P.: Theory, strategy and entrepreneurship. In: D.J. Teece (ed.) The Competitive Challenge, pp. 137–158 (1987)Google Scholar
  86. Salunke, S., Weerawardena, J., Mccoll-Kennedy, J.R.: Towards a model of dynamic capabilities in innovation-based competitive strategy: insights from project-oriented service firms. Ind. Mark. Manage. 40(8), 1251–1263 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Smith, D., Reams, R., Hair, J.F.J.: Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): a useful tool for family business researchers. J. Fam. Bus. Strateg. 5(1), 105–115 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Schepker, D.J., Oh, W.-Y., Martynov, A., Poppo, L.: Themany futures of contracts: Moving beyond structure and safeguarding to coordination and adaptation. J. Manag. 40(1), 193–225 (2014)Google Scholar
  89. Schumpeter, J.A.: The Theory of Economic Development, vols. 1 and 2. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1934)Google Scholar
  90. Singh, H., Zollo, M.: Globalization through acquisitions and alliances: an evolutionary perspective. In: Gatignon, H., Kimberly, J.R., Gunter, R.E. (eds.) The INSEAD-Wharton Alliance on globalizing strategies for building successful global business. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  91. Souitaris, V.: Strategic influences of technological innovation in Greece. Br. J. Manag. 12(2), 131–147 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Subramaniam, M., Youndt, M.A.: The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Acad. Manag. J. 48(3), 450–463 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Szulanski, G.: Exploring internal stickness: to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 17(Special Issue), 27–43 (1996)Google Scholar
  94. Tavani, S.N., Sharifi, H., Ismail, H.S.: A study of contingency relationships between supplier involvement, absorptive capacity and agile product innovation. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 34(1), 65–92 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Teece, D.J.: Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15(6), 285–305 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Teece, D.J.: Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 28(13), 1319–1350 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg. Manag. J. 18(7), 509–533 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Tiemessen, I., Lane, H.W., Crossan, M.M., Inkpen, A.C.: Knowledge management in international joint ventures. In: Beamish, P.W., Killing, J.P. (eds.) Cooperative Strategies: North American Perspectives, San Francisco (1997)Google Scholar
  99. Tranfield, D., Starkey, K.: The Nature, Social Organization and Promotion of Management Research: Towards Policy. Br. J. Manag. 9(4), 341–353 (1998)Google Scholar
  100. Tu, Q., Vonderembse, M.A., Ragu-Nathan, T.S., Sharkey, T.W.: Absorptive capacity: enhancing the assimilation of time-based manufacturing practices. J. Operat. Manag. 24(5), 692–710 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Vaccaro, I.G., Jansen, J.J.P., Bosch, F.A.J.V.D., Volberda, H.W.: Management innovation and leadership: the moderating role of organizational size. J. Manage. Stud. 49(1), 28–51 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Van den Bosch, F.A.J., Van, W.R., Volberda, H.W.: Absorptive capacity: antecedents, models and outcomes. In: Social Science Research Network, ERIM Report Series Reference No. ERS-2003-035-STR (2003)Google Scholar
  103. Volberda, H.W., Foss, N.J., Lyles, M.A.: Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: how to realize its potential in the organization field. Organ. Sci. 21(4), 931–951 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wang, C.L., Ahmed, P.K.: Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 9(1), 31–51 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Webster, F.E.: The changing role of marketing in the corporation. J. Mark. 56(4), 1–17 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wernerfelt, B.: A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 5(2), 171–180 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wiklund, J., Shepherd, D.: Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strateg. Manag. J. 24(13), 1307–1314 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Williams, L., Rao, K.: Information technology adoption: using classical adoption models to predict AEI software implementation. J. Bus. Log. (1998)Google Scholar
  109. Wilson, D.T.: Merging adoption process and organizational buying models. Adv. Consum. Res. 14(1), 323–325 (1987)Google Scholar
  110. Winter, S.G.: Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strateg. Manag. J. 24(10), 991–995 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Witt, U.: Firms as realizations of entrepreneurial visions. J. Manage. Stud. 44(7), 1125–1140 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Wu, Q., He, Q., Duan, Y., O’Regan, N.: Implementing dynamic capabilities for corporate strategic change toward sustainability. Strateg. Change. Special Issue: Entrepreneurship and Innovation 21(5–6), 231–247 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Zahra, S.A., George, G.: Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Manag. Rev. 27(2), 185–203 (2002)Google Scholar
  114. Zahra, S.A., Sapienza, H.J., Davidsson, P.: Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda. J. Manage. Stud. 43(4), 917–955 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Zaltman, G., Duncun, R., Holbek, J.: Innovations and Organizations. Wiley, New York (1973)Google Scholar
  116. Zollo, M., Winter, S.G.: Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13(3), 339–351 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Management and EconomicsDalian University of TechnologyDalianChina

Personalised recommendations