Advertisement

Improving Feature Selection Using Elite Breeding QPSO on Gene Data set for Cancer Classification

  • Poonam Chaudhari
  • Himanshu Agarwal
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 695)

Abstract

This paper focuses on feature set selection on microarray gene expression for cancer classification. The gene expression data are incommensurate when it comes to number of genes and number of samples. This imbalance makes it important to study feature selection algorithms from the complex gene expression data. We conducted a research with quantum particle swarm optimization with elitist breeding (EBQPSO) on gene data sets. To the best of our knowledge, the exploration of the elitist is not taken into account for deep searching and classification applications with genetic data sets. Our contribution in this paper is to use EBQPSO algorithm on gene data sets for classification of cancer. The algorithm is tested with supervised and unsupervised learning approach, viz. support vector machine, J48 and neural network. The results show that EBQPSO outperforms particle swarm optimization (PSO) and quantum particle swarm optimization (QPSO) algorithms in terms of precision and recall value.

Keywords

EBQPSO Elitist breeding Precision Recall 

References

  1. 1.
    Gu, J., Taylor, C.R., Phil, D.: Practicing pathology in the era of big data and personalized medicine. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol., 1–9 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Genetic databases. www.nature.com/articles/
  3. 3.
    Long, D.W., Brown, M., Harris, C.: Principal components in time-series modeling. In: Control Conference (ECC) (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hira, Z.M., Gillies, D.F.: A review of feature selection and feature extraction methods applied on microarray data. Department of Computing, Imperial College London (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scholkopf, B., Smola, A., Muller, K.R.: Kernel principal component analysis. J. Neural Comput., 1299–1319 (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dongxiao, N., Xihua, G.: Application of Gauss Radial Kernel function principal component analysis model in the industrial enterprise’s wastewater treatment. In: Industrial Electronics and Applications, pp. 1–12. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bao, B.-K., Liu, G., Xu, C., Yan, S.: Inductive Robust principal component analysis. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 3794–3800 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nath, M.K.: Independent component analysis of real data. In: Advances in Pattern Recognition, pp. 266–279. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Trelea, I.C.: The particle swarm optimization algorithm: convergence analysis and parameter selection. Inf. Process. Lett., 317–325 (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cleghorn, C.W.: Particle swarm convergence: standardized analysis and topological influence. In: Swarm Intelligence Conference, pp. 134–145 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang, Z.-L.,Wu, A., Min, H.-Q.: An improved quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm with elitist breeding for unconstrained optimization. Comput. Intell. Neurosci., 674–686 (2015). Hindawi Publishing CorporationGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shinde, P.L., Gunjal, B.L.: Particle swarm optimization best feature selection method for face images. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., 2229—5518 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ahmad, I.: Feature selection using particle swarm optimization in intrusion detection. Int. J. Distrib. Sensor Netw. Special Issue Enabling Technol. Next-Gener. Sensor Netw. Prospects (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fernandes, S.L., Chakraborty, B., Gurupur, V.P., Prabhu, G.A.: Early skin cancer detection using computer aided diagnosis techniques. J. Integr. Design Process Sci., 33–43 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gautam, A., et al.: An improved mammogram classification approach using back propagation neural network. Data Eng. Intell. Comput., 369–376 (2018). SpringerGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alba, E., Garcia-Nieto, J., Jourdan, L., Talbi, E.-G.: Gene selection in cancer classification using PSO/SVM and GA/SVM hybrid algorithms. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramyachitra, D., Sofia, M., Manikandan, P.: Interval-value based particle swarm optimization algorithm for cancer-type specific gene selection and sample classification. Genomics (2015). ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xi, M., Sun, J., Liu, L., Fan, F., Wu, X.: Cancer feature selection and classification using a binary quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization and support vector machine. Comput. Math. Methods Med. (2016). Hindawi Publishing CorporationGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhao, J., Sun, J., Xu, W.: A binary quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm with cooperative approach. IJCSI Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sun, J., Feng, B., Xu, W.: Particle swarm optimization with particles having quantum behavior. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 325–331 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sun, J., Lai, C.H., Wu, X.J.: Particle Swarm Optimization: Classical and Quantum Perspectives. CRC Press (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Symbiosis Institute of TechnologyPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations