Preserving for a More Just Future: Tactics of Activist Data Archiving

Part of the Studies in Big Data book series (SBD, volume 38)


The ownership of the life cycle of data—who creates it, processes it, visualizes it, preserves it—is a question of enormous power in our data-saturated society. The task of collecting, analyzing, and safeguarding large sets of data typically falls within the purview of data professionals: data scientists or statisticians tasked with deciphering the insights of large numbers or variables. Acting like modern-day oracles, they must know what metadata to collect, anticipate the needs of future users, and carefully track changes as data is worked upon and contexts change.


  1. 1.
    Baudot, P.-Y. (2014). Who’s counting? Institutional autonomy and the production of activity data for disability policy in France (2006–2014). Partecipazione E Conflitto, 7(2), 294–313. Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brulliard, K. (2017, February 9). USDA removed animal welfare reports from its site. A showhorse lawsuit may be why. Washington Post. Retrieved from
  3. 3.
    Bruno, I., Didier, E., & Vitale, T. (2014). Statactivism: Forms of action between disclosure and affirmation. In Partecipazione e Conflitto. The Open Journal of Sociopolitical Studies, 7(2), 198–220.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Certeau, M. de. (1984). The practice of everyday life. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Currie, M., Paris, B. S., Pasquetto, I., & Pierre, J. (2016). The conundrum of police officer-involved homicides: Counter-data in Los Angeles County. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716663566. Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daston, L., & Galison, P. (2010). Objectivity. Zone Books.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dosemagen, S., Warren, J., & Wylie, S. (2011). Grassroots mapping: Creating a participatory map-making process centered on discourse. The Journal of Aesthetics & Protest, (8). Retrieved from
  8. 8.
    Eilperin, J. (2017, May 6). The EPA just buried its climate change website for kids. Retrieved June 24, 2017, from
  9. 9.
    Emerson, S. (2017, April 27). The interior department just quietly scrubbed its climate change page. Retrieved June 24, 2017, from
  10. 10.
    Jenkins, H., Ford, S. & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. US: New York University Press. Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kawano, Y., Shepard, D., Shobugawa, Y., Goto, J., Suzuki, T., Amaya, Y., … Naito, M. (2012). A map for the future: Measuring radiation levels in Fukushima, Japan. In 2012 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (pp. 53–58).
  12. 12.
    Kitchin, R., & Lauriault, T. P. (2014). Towards critical data studies: Charting and unpacking data assemblages and their work (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2474112). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from
  13. 13.
    Lartey, J. (2015, June 9). By the numbers: US police kill more in days than other countries do in years. The Guardian. Retrieved from
  14. 14.
    Latour, B. (1986). Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, 6, 1–40.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liboiron, M. (2015). Disaster data, data activism: Grassroots responses to representations of Superstorm Sandy. In J. Leyda & D. Negra (Eds.), Extreme weather and global media (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Milan, S. (2016). Data activism as the new frontier of media activism (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2882030). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from
  17. 17.
    Mooney, C., & Eilperin, J. (2017, April 29). EPA website removes climate science site from public view after two decades. Washington Post. Retrieved from
  18. 18.
    Ottinger, G. (2010). Buckets of resistance: Standards and the effectiveness of citizen science. Science, Technology and Human Values, 35(2), 244–270. Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sellie, A., Goldstein, J., Fair, M., & Hoyer, J. (2015). Interference archive: A free space for social movement culture. Archival Science, 15(4), 453–472. Scholar
  20. 20.
    Suchman, L. (2011). Practice and its overflows: Reflections on order and mess. TECNOSCIENZA: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 2(1), 21–30.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Varinsky, D. (n.d.). Data on climate change progress is disappearing from the US State Department website. Retrieved June 27, 2017, from
  22. 22.
    Wylie, S. A., Jalbert, K., Dosemagen, S., & Ratto, M. (2014). Institutions for civic technoscience: How critical making is transforming environmental research. The Information Society, 30(2), 116–126.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations