Advertisement

Concluding Remarks—Looking to the Future

  • Xuewei Li
  • Jinpei Wu
  • Xueyan Li
Chapter

Abstract

In the process of modeling the real world, an important question is: should the model be as abstract as possible or as realistic as possible? Should it describes as generally as possible, or depicts as specifically as possible? One thought is that the prerequisite of grasping the overall functionality of a system is to analyze in-depth the units which comprise the system; another thought believes that the so called “individuals” have relatively strong disorderliness and randomness, thus cannot completely represent the overall behavior of the system. Constant occurrence of complexity, on the other hand, will make it difficult to discover new laws. For the first thought, the mode of construction of its system analysis is from top to bottom. The framework is basically composed of mathematical equations with relatively fewer parameters and environmental changes. It is a highly linear modeling method. For the second thought, its mode of construction of system analysis is from bottom up; the framework of the model is composed of adaptive agents, with relative more parameters and environmental uncertainty. It is a highly nonlinear modeling method. Then, what role do the research and application of cellular automata play in the clash of the two different thoughts of modeling?

References

  1. Chopard, B., & Droz, M. (2003). Cellular automata modeling of physical systems (Y. Zhu & X. Zhao, Trans.). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2013). Connected (J. Xue, Trans.). Beijing: Remin University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Couclelis, H. (1997). From cellular automata to urban models: New principles for model development and implementation. Environment and Planning B, 24(2), 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crutchfield, J. P., & Hanson, J. E. (1993). Turbulent pattern bases for cellular automata. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 69(3–4), 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dabbaghian, V., Spicer, V., & Singh, S. K. (2011). The social impact in a high-risk community: A cellular automata model. Journal of Computational Science, 2, 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Forrest, S. (1991). Emergent computation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. He, C., Shi, P., Chen, J., et al. (2005). Study of the model of land use situation based on system dynamics and cellular automata models. Chinese Science, 35(5), 464–473.Google Scholar
  8. Lee, H. Y., Lee, H. W., & Kim, D. (1999). Dynamic states of a continuum traffic equation with on-ramp. Physical Review E, 59(5), 5101–5111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Li, X., & Ye, J. (2004). Knowledge discovery and geographical cellular automata. Chinese Science, volume D: Earth Science, 34(9), 865–872.Google Scholar
  10. Liu, X., & Li, X. (2006). Obtaining cellular automata’s nonlinear transformation rules from space with high-dimensional characteristics. Journal of Geography, 61(6), 663–672.Google Scholar
  11. Liu, X., & Li, X. (2007). Fisher discriminant and automatically obtaining cellular automata’s transformation rules. Journal of Surveying, 36(1), 112–117.Google Scholar
  12. Liu, X., Li X., Ye, J., et. al. (2007). Using ant colony intelligence to mine the transformation rules of geographical cellular automata. Chinese Science, 37(6), 824–834.Google Scholar
  13. Mitchell, M. (2011). Complexity: A guided tour (T. Lu, Trans.). Changsha: Hunan Science & Technology Press.Google Scholar
  14. Su, F., Yao, Lingkan, & Gao, Zhaoning. (2006). The application of fractal cellular automata in borderline self-organization. Journal of Xinan Jiaotong University, 41(6), 675–679.Google Scholar
  15. Tero, A., Takagi, S., Saigust, T., et al. (2010). Rules for biologically inspired adaptive network design. Science, 327(5964), 439–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tian, X., Duan, X., Liu, X., et al. (2007). Study of cellular automata’s quasi-period three behavior based on BPSO. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 4(4), 25–31.Google Scholar
  17. Wang, H., Qiu, Q., Wang, C., et al. (2012). Application of the coupling between fractal and cellular automata to the urban eco planning of Xiamen city. Environmental Science and Technology, 35(3), 168–172.Google Scholar
  18. Wolfram, S. (1985). Twenty problems in the theory of cellular automata. Physica Scripta, T9, 170–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wu, F. (1998). SimLand: A prototype to simulate land conversion through the integrated GIS and ca with AHP-derived transition rules. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang, J. (2011). Overview of emergence computation. Journal of Wuyi University, 4, 29–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Beijing Jiaotong University Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beijing Union UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Wuyi UniversityJiangmenChina
  3. 3.Beijing Jiaotong universityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations