Abstract
This chapter considers how a collaborative autoethnographic (CAE) approach informed and lent insight into our research. The research explored how affinity tourism can ignite interest in the not-so-familiar and through the familiar connect visitors with the foreign or exotic in a destination. In the process, it focused on the case of the Gardens by the Bay in Singapore (The Gardens) and CAE and so, allowed for use of ‘reflexivity’ to explore and examine how the phenomenon of affinity tourism plays a role in enhancing the efficacy of attractions as tourism resources. The concept of affinity refers to tourists’ activities that involve elements that are familiar to tourists. These recognisable aspects conjure notions of a shared or similar cultural understanding and draw tourist to attractions, events or destinations. By engaging a CAE approach that is grounded in reflexivity, this chapter presents accounts of the experiences of two people who employed CAE as a way to explore and understand how they as people of one culture (Australian) could connect with and learn about the culture of ‘The Other’, in this case Singaporean. It explains how engagement with a coresearcher who encountered the same tourist activity and experienced it in similar or different ways opens up opportunities for new insights about The Other. Use of participant observation, photographs and diary notes assisted in crafting of narratives, which when shared and probed contributed to exploration of the expectations and perceptions of the authors themselves as tourists and as researchers in their endeavours to engage with The Other. In so doing, this chapter advances knowledge about methodological approaches in exploring tourists’ experiences and affinity tourism and contributes to a growing interest in reflexivity as a valuable and valid tool for conducting tourism research. It shows the contribution, credibility and limitations which CAE can bring to tourism research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adamson, J., & Muller, T. (2017). Joint autoethnography of teacher experience in the academy: Exploring methods for collaborative inquiry, international. Journal of Research & Method in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1279139.
Allen-Collinson, J. (2013). (A) Autoethnography as the engagement of self/other, self/culture, self/politics, selves/futures. In S. Holman, S. Jones, T. E. Adams, & C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (pp. 281–299). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Anderson, T. D., & Fourie, I. (2015). Collaborative autoethnography as a way of seeing the experience of care giving as an information practice. In: Proceedings of ISIC, the information behaviour conference, Leeds, 2–5 September 2014, Part 2, (paper isic33). Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/ir/20-1/isic2/isic33.html
Battaglia, D. (2017). Aeroponic gardens and their magic: Plants/persons/ethics in suspension. History and Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2017.1289935.
Bochner, A. P. (2001). Narrative’s virtues. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(2), 131–157.
Bochner, A. P., & Ellis, C. (1995). Telling and living: Narrative co-construction and the practices of interpersonal relationships. In W. Leeds-Hurwitz (Ed.), Social approaches to communication (pp. 201–213). New York: Guildford Publications.
Botterill, D., & Platenkamp, V. (2012). Key concepts in tourism research. London: Sage.
Bruner, E. M. (1995). The ethnographer/tourist in Indonesia. In M. Lanfant, J. B. Allcock, & E. M. Bruner (Eds.), International tourism: Identity and change anthropological and sociological approaches (pp. 224–241). London: Sage.
Bruner, E. M. (2005). Culture on tour: Ethnographies of travel. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Chang, H., Wambura Ngunjiri, F., & Hernandez, K. C. (2013). Collaborative autoethnography. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Denzin, N. K. (2003). Performing [auto] ethnography politically. The Review of Education, Pedagogy & Cultural Studies, 25(3), 257–278.
Denzin, N. (2006). Analytic autoethnography, or déjà vu all over again. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35, 419–428.
Denzin, N. (2013). Interpretive autoethnography. In S. H. Jones, T. T. Adams, & C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (pp. 123–142). Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.
Denzin, N. K. (2014). Interpretive autoethnography (Vol. 17). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Doty, R. L. (2010). Autoethnography–making human connections. Review of International Studies, 36(04), 1047–1050.
Ellis, C. (1998). Exploring loss through autoethnographic inquiry: Autoethnographic stories, co-constructed narratives, and interpretive interviews. In J. H. Harvey (Ed.), Perspectives on loss: A sourcebook (pp. 49–62). Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis.
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (1996). Composing ethnography: Alternative forms of qualitative writing. Walnut Creek: Alta Mira Press.
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 36(4), 273–290.
Everett, S. (2010). Lessons from the field: Reflecting on a tourism research journey around the ‘celtic’ periphery. Current Issues in Tourism, 13(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500902853502.
Foucault, M. (1983). On the genealogy of ethics. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed., pp. 229–252). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Garbati, J. F., & Rothschild, N. (2016). Lasting impact of study abroad experiences: A collaborative autoethnography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 17(2). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2387/396.
Gardens by the Bay. (2017a). About us. http://www.gardensbythebay.com.sg/en/the-gardens/about-us/corporate-information.html
Gardens by the Bay. (2017b). Introduction. http://www.gardensbythebay.com.sg/en/the-gardens/our-story/introduction.html
Gardens by the Bay. (2017c). Gardens by the Bay Annual Report http://www.gardensbythebay.com.sg/content/dam/gbb/the-gardens/about-us/GB_FY1516_Annual_Report_191016_Low_Res_V15.pdf
Hayano, D. M. (1979). Auto-ethnography: Paradigms, problems and prospects. Human Organization, 38(1), 99–104.
Martinez, A., & Merlino, A. (2014). I don’t want to die before visiting Graceland: A collaborative autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(8), 990–997.
McIlveen, P. (2008). Autoethnography as a method for reflexive research and practice in vocational psychology. Australian Journal of Career Development, 17(2), 13–20.
Mead, M. (1977). Culture and commitment: A study in the generation gap. London: Panther.
Moore, J., Scarduzio, J. A., Plump, B., & Geist-Martin, P. (2013). The light and shadow of feminist research mentorship: A collaborative autoethnography of faculty-student research. Journal of Research Practice, 9(2), 8–32.
Pelias, R. (2003). The academic tourist: An authethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(3), 369–373.
Reed-Danahay, D. E. (Ed.). (1997). Auto/ethnography: Rewriting the self and the social. Oxford: Berg.
Sawyer, R. D. & Norris, J. (2009). Duoethnography: Articulations/(re)creation of meaning in the making. In W. S. Gershon (Ed.), The collaborative turn: Working together in qualitative research (pp.127–140). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Sparkes, A. (2000). Autoethnography and narratives of self: Reflections on criteria in action. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17, 21–43.
Swain, M. (2009). Chapter 4: Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London: Continuum.
Thirumaran, K. (2008). Local (Dis) junctions and Affinity Tourism: Singapore and Bali (Unpublished PhD thesis), National University of Singapore. Retrieved from: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/13221
Urry, J. (1990). The tourist gaze: Leisure and travel in contemporary society. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pryce, J., Pryce, H. (2018). Utilising Collaborative Autoethnography in Exploring Affinity Tourism: Insights from Experiences in the Field at Gardens by the Bay. In: Mura, P., Khoo-Lattimore, C. (eds) Asian Qualitative Research in Tourism. Perspectives on Asian Tourism. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7491-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7491-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7490-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7491-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)