Notarization of Knowledge Retrieval from Biomedical Repositories Using Blockchain Technology

  • P. Mytis-Gkometh
  • G. Drosatos
  • P. S. Efraimidis
  • E. Kaldoudi
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 66)

Abstract

Biomedical research and clinical decision depend increasingly on a number of authoritative databases, mostly public and continually enriched via peer scientific contributions. Given the dynamic nature of data and their usage in the sensitive domain of biomedical science, it is important to ensure retrieved data integrity and non-repudiation, that is, ensure that retrieved data cannot be modified after retrieval and that the database cannot validly deny that the particular data has been provided as a result of a specific query. In this paper, we propose the use of blockchain technology in combination with digital signatures to create smart digital contracts to seal the query and the respective results each time a third-party requests evidence from a reference biomedical database. The feasibility of the proposed approach is demonstrated using a real blockchain infrastructure and a publicly available medical risk factor reference repository.

Keywords

Biomedical repositories Cryptographic techniques Blockchain Integrity Non-repudiation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partly supported by the European Commission FP7-ICT project CARRE (Grant No. 611140).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Williams WG (2010) Uses and limitations of registry and academic databases. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 13:66–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duck G, Nenadic G, Filannino M et al (2016) A survey of bioinformatics database and software usage through mining the literature. PLoS ONE 11:e0157989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vaughan K, Scolaro KL, Anksorus HN et al (2014) An evaluation of pharmacogenomic information provided by five common drug information resources. J Med Libr Assoc 102:47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Go EP (2010) Database resources in metabolomics: an overview. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 5:18–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA et al (2008) Comparison of PubMed, scopus, web of science, and google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 22:338–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buterin V (2014) A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. White Paper. http://www.ethereum.org/pdfs/EthereumWhitePaper.pdf
  7. 7.
    Carre P (2016) CARRE risk factor reference repository. FP7 EU project (FP7-ICT-611140). https://www.carre-project.eu/innovation/carre-risk-factor-entry-system
  8. 8.
    Nakamoto S (2008) Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
  9. 9.
    Cachin C (2016) Architecture of the hyperledger blockchain fabric. In: Workshop on distributed cryptocurrencies and consensus ledgers (DCCL), Chicago, Illinois, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herrera-Joancomartí J (2015) Research and challenges on bitcoin anonymity. In: Data privacy management, autonomous spontaneous security, and security assurance. LNCS, vol 8872. Springer, Cham, pp 3–16Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Housley R, Ford W, Polk W et al (1998) Internet X. 509 public key infrastructure certificate and CRL profile, pp 2070–1721Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Matsumoto S, Reischuk RM (2016) IKP: turning a PKI around with blockchains. IACR Cryptol ePrint Arch 2016:1018Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yli-Huumo J, Ko D, Choi S et al (2016) Where is current research on blockchain technology?—a systematic review. PLoS ONE 11:e0163477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mettler M (2016) Blockchain technology in healthcare: the revolution starts here. In: 18th international conference on e-health networking, applications and services, Munich, Germany, pp 1–3Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yue X, Wang H, Jin D et al (2016) Healthcare data gateways: found healthcare intelligence on blockchain with novel privacy risk control. J Med Syst 40:218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roehrs A, da Costa CA, da Rosa Righi R (2017) OmniPHR: a distributed architecture model to integrate personal health records. J Biomed Inform 71:70–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Azaria A, Ekblaw A, Vieira T et al (2016) Medrec: using blockchain for medical data access and permission management. In: International Conference on open and big data (OBD), pp 25–30Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carlisle BG (2014) Proof of prespecified endpoints in medical research with the bitcoin blockchain. Web Blog. The Grey Literature. https://www.bgcarlisle.com/blog/2014/08/25/proof-of-prespecified-endpoints-in-medical-research-with-the-bitcoin-blockchain/. Accessed 29 Aug 2017
  19. 19.
    Nugent T, Upton D, Cimpoesu M (2016) Improving data transparency in clinical trials using blockchain smart contracts. F1000Res 5:2541Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Penard W, van Werkhoven T (2008) On the secure hash algorithm family. National Security Agency, Technical ReportGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Third A, Kaldoudi E, Gkotsis G et al (2015) Capturing scientific knowledge on medical risk factors. In: 1st International workshop on capturing scientific knowledge, collocated with the 8th international conference on knowledge capture (K-CAP), Palisades, NY, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Mytis-Gkometh
    • 1
  • G. Drosatos
    • 2
  • P. S. Efraimidis
    • 1
  • E. Kaldoudi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringDemocritus University of ThraceKimmeria, XanthiGreece
  2. 2.School of MedicineDemocritus University of ThraceAlexandroupoliGreece

Personalised recommendations