Abstract
As a new transnational agenda in Asian studies continues to produce research that destabilizes intellectual, spatial, and political boundaries, efforts to teach “the region” or country-based histories have become increasingly more difficult to sustain. For Southeast Asianists, this shift in perspective is nothing new. Most textbooks covering Southeast Asian history before 1830 demonstrate the region’s inter-Asian connectedness. However, maintaining this transnational sensitivity becomes less certain when teaching post-1830 content, when Westphalian boundaries begin to frame how Southeast Asian experiences are written and taught. Although scholarship has already begun to rescue these histories from colonial and national framings, finding effective ways to bridge pre-colonial histories with colonial/postcolonial experiences remains a challenge for scholars teaching in Southeast Asia, where projects designed to affirm the nation and the region are still very much a work in progress. The use of Amitav Ghosh’s The Glass Palace has been particularly effective in the effort to teach a Southeast Asian history that addresses these broader intellectual concerns.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Bruce Cummings, “Boundary Displacement: Area Studies and International Studies during and after the Cold War,” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1997.
- 2.
Prasenjit Duara, “Asia Redux: Conceptualizing a Region for Our Times,” Journal of Asian Studies (JAS), Vol. 69, No. 4, 2010.
- 3.
Eric Tagliacozzo, Helen F. Siu, and Peter C. Perdue (eds.), Asia Inside Out: Connected Places, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2015.
- 4.
Prasenjit Duara, The Crisis of Global Modernity: Asian Traditions and a Sustainable Future, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
- 5.
Within the context of Asian Studies, “transnational ” perspectives overlap with other terms and methods that share the same commitment to crossing territorial and epistemological borders. Other phrases in circulation include “Inter-Asian”, “Trans-Asian”, and “Comparative Asian” approaches.
- 6.
Sunil S. Amrith, Crossing the Bay of Bengal: The Furies of Nature and the Fortunes of Migrants, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2015 (Reprint Edition); Ho En Seng, The Graves of Tarim: Genealogy and Mobility across the Indian Ocean, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006; Susan P. Mains, “Teaching Transnationalism in the Caribbean: Toward an Understanding of Representation and Neo-Colonialism in Human Geography,” Journal of Geography in Higher Education, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2004.
- 7.
H. Lynn Ericson, Louis A. Lanning, and Rachel French, Concept-based Learning & Teaching for the Thinking Classroom, London: Corwin, 2017 (2nd Edition).
- 8.
Amitav Ghosh, The Glass Palace, New York: Random House, 2001.
- 9.
John Smail, “On the Possibility of an Autonomous History of Modern Southeast Asia,” Journal of Southeast Asian History, 1961, Vol. 2, No. 2; G. M. Kelly, “The Teaching of Southeast Asian History,” Journal of Southeast Asian History, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1966.
- 10.
David Szanton (ed.), The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2004.
- 11.
Since the 1950s, the phrase “area-studies” came to refer to a US-based intellectual/institutional division of the (non-Western) world into various regions that were regarded as having shared historical, cultural, linguistic, social, and geographical features. See Albert H. Marckwardt, “The Humanities and Non-Western Studies,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 356 (Nov. 1964), and David L. Szanton, “Introduction: The Origin, Nature, and Challenges of Area Studies in the United States,” in The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines (ed. David Szanton), Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2004.
- 12.
George Coédes, The Indianized States of Southeast Asia, Kuala Lumpur: University of Malay Press, 1968.
- 13.
O. W. Wolters, History, Culture, and Region in Southeast Asian Perspective, Ithaca: Southeast Asia Program Publications Cornell University, 1999.
- 14.
Victor Lieberman, Strange Parallels: Southeast Asia in Global Context, 800ce to 1830ce, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
- 15.
Barbara Watson Andaya, “Response to Prasenjit Duara, ‘Asia Redux’,” Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 69, No. 4, 2010.
- 16.
John Smail, “On the Possibility of an Autonomous History of Modern Southeast Asia,” Journal of Southeast Asian History, 1961, Vol. 2, No. 2; Harry J. Benda, “The Structure of Southeast Asian History: Some Preliminary Observations,” Journal of Southeast Asian History, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1962.
- 17.
Eric Tagliacozzo, Secret Trades, Porous Borders: Smuggling and States along a Southeast Asian Frontier, 1865–1915, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.
- 18.
Steven J. Ericson, “Literature in the Japanese History Classroom,” Education About Asia, Vol. 6, No. 1, Ann Arbor: Association for Asian Studies, 2001.
- 19.
Shanthini Pillai, “Resignifying ‘Coolie’: Amitav Ghosh’s The Glass Palace,” in Chitra Sankaran (ed.), History, Narrative, and Testimony in Amitav Ghosh’s Fiction, SUNY Press, 2012; Nandini Bhautoo-Dewnarain, “The Glass Palace: Reconnecting Two Diasporas,” in Chitra Sankaran (ed.), History, Narrative, and Testimony in Amitav Ghosh’s Fiction, SUNY Press, 2012.
- 20.
Willem Van Schendel, “Spatial Moments: Chittagong in Four Scenes,” in Eric Tagliacozzo, Helen F. Siu, and Peter C. Perdue (eds.), Asia Inside Out: Connected Places, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005.
- 21.
Merle Ricklefs, Bruce Lockhart, Albert Lao, Portia Reyes, Maitrii Aung-Thwin, A New History of Southeast Asia, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
- 22.
Anthony Reid, A History of Southeast Asia: Critical Crossroads, West Sussex: Wiley & Sons, 2015; Merle Ricklefs, Bruce Lockhart, Albert Lao, Portia Reyes, Maitrii Aung-Thwin, A New History of Southeast Asia, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010; Milton Osborne, Southeast Asia: An Introductory History, Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin, 2010 (10th Edition).
- 23.
Craig Reynolds, “A New Look at Old Southeast Asia,” Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 54, No. 2, 1995.
- 24.
James C. Scott, The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976; James Warren, Rickshaw Coolie: A People’s History of Singapore, 1880–1940, Singapore: NUS Press, 2003; Barbara Andaya, The Flaming Womb: Repositioning Women in Early Modern Southeast Asia, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2006.
- 25.
Thongchai Winchakul, Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-body of a Nation, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1994.
- 26.
Thongchai Winichakul, “Writing at the Interstices: Southeast Asian Historians and Post-National Histories in Southeast Asia,” in Abu Talib Ahmad and Tan Liok Ee (eds.) New Terrains in Southeast Asian History, Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 2003.
- 27.
The Konbaung dynasty was conquered by the British over the course of the nineteenth century in three successive wars known in English as the Anglo-Burmese Wars (1824–6, 1852–3, 1885).
- 28.
John Smail, “On the Possibility of an Autonomous History of Modern Southeast Asia,” Journal of Southeast Asian History, 1961, Vol. 2, No. 2; Harry J. Benda, “The Structure of Southeast Asian History: Some Preliminary Observations,” Journal of Southeast Asian History, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1962.
- 29.
Eric Tagliacozzo, Secret Trades, Porous Borders: Smuggling and States along a Southeast Asian Frontier, 1865–1915, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005; Sugata Bose, A Hundred Horizons, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006; Thomas Metcalf, Imperial Connections: India in the Indian Ocean Arena, 1860–1920, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007; Subaltern Lives: Biographies of Colonialism in the Indian Ocean World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012; Sunil Amrith, Crossing the Bay of Bengal: The Furies of Nature and Fortunes of Migrants, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2013.
- 30.
Tim Harper and Sunil S. Amrith, “Sites of Interaction: An Introduction,” in Modern Asian Studies, 46, 2 (2012).
- 31.
Willem Van Schendel, “Spatial Moments: Chittagong in Four Scenes,” in Eric Tagliacozzo, Helen F. Siu, and Peter Perdue (eds.) Asia Inside Out: Connected Places, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2015.
- 32.
Amitav Ghosh, The Glass Palace: A Novel, New York: Random House, 2001, p. 426.
- 33.
Jianxiong Ma, “Salt and Revenue in Frontier Formation: State Mobilized Ethnic Politics in the Yunnan-Burma Border Borderland since the 1720s,” Modern Asian History, 48, 6, 2014; C. Patterson Giersch, Asian Borderlands: The Transformation of Qing China’s Yunnan Frontier, London: Harvard University Press, 2006.
- 34.
James C. Scott, The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.
- 35.
Early writers of Southeast Asian history, especially those writing in the context of British India (and to some extent post-Independence India as well), regarded the region as little more than an extension of India’s own historical and cultural trajectory. Notions that Southeast Asia was merely a “farther India” or an India “beyond the Ganges” highlighted the epistemological position of India as a reference point for understanding Southeast Asia. Early ideas about early SEA civilizations in fact pointed to the process of Indianization as being critical to the establishment of “Indianized” kingdoms in the region. In reaction to this view, area-studies specialists developed ideas of localization and local knowledge to provide agency for Southeast Asians. While Brahmanic influences are regularly acknowledged as part of the Southeast Asian cultural matrix, the explicit role of Indians (at least until the colonial period), began to fade from the pages of standard texts.
- 36.
Ghosh, p. 351.
- 37.
Ghosh, p. 372.
- 38.
Jean and John L. Comaroff, Of Revelation and Revolution, Volume I: Christianity, Colonialism, and Consciousness in South Africa, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
- 39.
Albert Mémmi, The Colonized and the Colonizer, Boston: Beacon Press, 1991 (1967), p. 121.
- 40.
Mémmi, p. 126.
- 41.
Tim Bunnell, “City Networks as Alternative Geographies of Southeast Asia,” Trans-Regional-National Studies of Southeast Asia, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aung-Thwin, M. (2018). Connections, Contact, and Community in the Southeast Asian Past: Teaching Transnational History Through Amitav Ghosh’s The Glass Palace. In: Wong, J. (eds) Asia and the Historical Imagination. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7401-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7401-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7400-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7401-1
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)