Advertisement

Challenges and Issues in Implementation of Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Rubal Bansal
  • Saurabh Maheshwari
  • Payal Awwal
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 472)

Abstract

Underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs) is an emerging technology. Undersea, it is not possible for us to frequently change the batteries of sensors deployed in network so some strategies are taken under consideration to increase the node capabilities in UWSNs. Being the least explored, issues and challenges in underwater networks oceans always remain one of the tempting topics for researchers. In this paper, we have compiled constituents of UWSN, issues and challenges. The challenges related to routing strategies require essential exposure to the researchers. Recent articles have been analyzed, discussed further working directions have been described and major network design issues at different layers have also been discussed. The paper has importance for the researchers looking to work in this area and looking for future problems.

Keywords

UWSNs challenges Layer issues Applications Overview UWSNs Routing strategies 

References

  1. 1.
    Smith RN, Schwager M, Smith SL, Jones BH, Rus D, Sukhatme GS (2011) Persistent ocean monitoring with underwater gliders: adapting sampling resolution. J Field Robot 28(5):714–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kasture A, Raut A, Thool S (2014) Visualization of wireless sensor network by a java framework for security in defense surveillance. In: 2014 International conference on electronic systems, signal processing and computing technologies. Nagpur, pp 256–261.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICESC.2014.49
  3. 3.
    Heidemann J, Stojanovic M, Zorzi M (2012) Underwater sensor networks: applications, advances and challenges. Phil Trans R Soc A 370(1958):158–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gautam KK, Gautam NK, Agrawal PC Memory required for wireless sensor nodes on the basis of characteristics and behaviour when using tinyOSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li N, Martínez JF, Meneses Chaus JM, Eckert M (2016) A survey on underwater acoustic sensor network routing protocols. Sensors 16(3):414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Climent S, Capella JV, Meratnia N, Serrano JJ (2012) Underwater sensor networks: a new energy efficient and robust architecture. Sensors 12(1):704–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ahmed M, Salleh M, Channa MI (2016) Routing protocols based on node mobility for underwater wireless sensor network (UWSN): a survey. J Netw Comput ApplGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manjula RB, Manvi SS (2011) Issues in underwater acoustic sensor networks. Int J Comput Electr Eng 3(1):101Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guo X, Frater MR, Ryan MJ (2006) A propagation-delay-tolerant collision avoidance protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks. In: OCEANS 2006—Asia Pacific. Singapore, pp 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANSAP.2006.4393849
  10. 10.
    Noh Y, Lee U, Han S, Wang P, Torres D, Kim J, Gerla M (2014) DOTS: a propagation delay-aware opportunistic MAC protocol for mobile underwater networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 13(4):766–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edvinoe Christina DPS, Jothi Chitra R (2011) Energy efficient secure routing in wireless sensor networks. In: 2011 international conference on emerging trends in electrical and computer technology. Tamil Nadu, pp 982–986.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETECT.2011.5760262
  12. 12.
    Chen YS, Lin YW (2014) A mobicast routing protocol with carry-and-forward in vehicular ad hoc networks. Int J Commun Syst 27(10):1416–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Javaid N, Hussain S, Hafeez T, Maqsood H, Zarar S (Nov 2015). EEHR: energy efficient hybrid routing protocol for underwater WSNs. In: 2015 10th International Conference on Broadband and wireless computing, communication and applications (BWCCA). IEEE, pp 20–26Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wahid A, Lee S, Jeong HJ, Kim D (2011). Eedbr: energy-efficient depth-based routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. In: Advanced computer science and information technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 223–234Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Caruso A, Paparella F, Vieira LFM, Erol M, Gerla M (2008) The meandering current mobility model and its impact on underwater mobile sensor networks. In: INFOCOM 2008—the 27th conference on computer communications. IEEE, Phoenix, AZ.  https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM.2008.53
  16. 16.
    Erol M, Vieira LFM, Gerla M (2007) Localization with Dive’N’Rise (DNR) beacons for underwater acoustic sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the second workshop on underwater networks (WuWNet ‘07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 97–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1287812.1287833
  17. 17.
    Nicolaou N, See A, Xie P, Cui JH, Maggiorini D (2007) Improving the robustness of location-based routing for underwater sensor networks. In: OCEANS 2007. Europe, Aberdeen, pp 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANSE.2007.4302470
  18. 18.
    Tan H-P, Diamant R, Seah WKG, Waldmeyer M (Oct 2011) A survey of techniques and challenges in underwater localization, Ocean Eng 38(14–15):1663–1676, ISSN 0029-8018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceanengCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer ScienceGwecaAjmerIndia

Personalised recommendations