Study of Electromagnetic Radiation Effects on Human Body and Reduction Techniques

  • Rupesh Acharya
  • Durgesh Kumar
  • Garima Mathur
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 472)


It is 2017 and mobile communication technology has completely engraved itself into our lives. Mobile communication technology usage has been quickly develop internationally in the last 10 years, which has ensued in concern of public about the harmful health effect of electromagnetic (EM) radiation that are discharged by cell phones. The exposure of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) has received an equitable share of participation in literature; however, this paper is one to represent the effects of the electromagnetic fields induced by cell phones on human body, plans related to electromagnetic vulnerability in mobile communication and present feasible ways of reducing the effects.


Epidemiological EM radiation Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Mobile communication system 


  1. 1.
    Mohan Kumar D (2014) Mobile phones radiation 2010. Accessed 15 Aug 2014 [Online]. Available:
  2. 2.
    Dutta N (Jan 2013) Can electromagnetic radiation from mobile towers harm you? Accessed 15 Aug 2014 [Online]. Available:
  3. 3.
    Hardell L, Carlberg M, Soderqvist F, Mild KH (2008) Meta-analysis of long-term mobile phone use and the association with brain tumours. Int J Oncol 32:1097–1103Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Luria R, Eliyashu I, Hareuveny R, Margaliot M, Meiran N (2009) Cognitive effects of radiation emitted by cellular phone: the exposure side and time. Bio Electromagnet 30:198–204Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lu M, X-Y Wu (2009) Study of specific absorption rate (SAR) induced in the human endocrine glands for using mobile phones. In: 7th Asia Pacific international symposium on electromagnetic compatibility, IEEE 2016 by cellular phone: the exposure side and time. Bio Electromagnetics, vol 30, pp 198–204Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sambo YA, Heliot F, Imran MA (2015) A survey and tutorial of electromagnetic radiation and reduction in mobile communication systems. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 17(2)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhu C, Wu D, Ping L, Liang W (2015) The effects of head parameters on the specific absorption rate in the human head. IEEE 2015 8th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kumar G (December 2010) Report on cell tower radiationGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    IARC classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans. Lyon, France, Press Release No. 208 (May 2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 Ghz). Health Phys 4(74):494–522 (Apr 1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hwang J, Chen F Reduction of the peak SAR in the human head with metamaterials. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 54(12):3763–3770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ragha L, Bhatia M (2010) Evaluation of SAR reduction for mobile phones using RF shields. Int J Comput Appl 1(13):80–85Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pretorius J (Nov 2004) Design and manufacture of a ferromagnetic wave absorber for cellular phone radiations. In: Proceedings of 12th International Symposium on EDMO. Berg-en-Dal, South Africa, pp 119–123Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stevanovic I, Skrivervik A, Mosig JR (Jan 2003) Smart antenna systems for mobile communications. Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne, Technical Report. Lausanne, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jain RK, Katiyar S, Agrawal NK (2011) Smart antenna for cellular mobile communication. VSRD Int J Electr Electron Commun Eng 1(9):530–541Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nowicki D, Roumeliotos J (April 1995) Smart antenna strategies. Mobile Communications International. London, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Poornima College of EngineeringRajasthan Technical UniversityJaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations