Exploring Future Water Demand and Climate Change Impacts on Water Availability in the Peace Region of British Columbia, Canada

  • Jennifer R. Dierauer
  • Diana M. Allen
  • Paul H. Whitfield
Chapter
Part of the Global Environmental Studies book series (GENVST)

Abstract

In recent decades, the Peace River watershed in Northeast British Columbia (NEBC) has experienced rapid growth in shale gas development activities, resulting in significant increases in surface water and groundwater use and a growing conflict over the use and protection of these water resources. Under a high development scenario, industrial water demand in the Peace River watershed is projected to increase by over 350% by 2030, and future water security in the context of the water-energy nexus is unknown, especially with continued climate warming. In this study, hydrological models are used to simulate the current and future water balance for two headwater catchments of the Peace River watershed, one in the foothills and one in the plains. Both catchments have been impacted by the recent shale gas development, and both contain oil and gas industry water use permits. Climate variables output from three Global Climate Models were used as inputs for the hydrologic models. Water quantity projections for future decades (2020s, 2030s, 2040s, and 2050s) were then compared to the projected water use for low, medium, and high shale gas development scenarios and used to estimate the potential for water scarcity in the region. Results from this study show that areas with high levels of oil and gas industry development may experience water scarcity if rapid industrial growth continues, and improved water management policies will be needed to mitigate the high industrial water demand.

Keywords

Shale gas Climate change Water security Water allocation Northeast British Columbia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions, a Simon Fraser University graduate entrance scholarship to Jennifer Dierauer, and the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto, Japan.

References

  1. BCOGC (2016) Water management for oil and gas activity 2015 Annual report’. Downloaded from https://www.bcogc.ca/node/13261/download on 20 March 2017
  2. Cannon AJ (2015) Selecting GCM scenarios that span the range of changes in a multimodel ensemble: application to CMIP5 climate extremes indices. J Clim 28(3):1260–1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chapman, A., Kerr, B., Wilford, D (2012) Hydrological modelling and decision-support tool development for water allocation, Northeastern British Columbia; In: Geoscience BC summary of activities 2011, geoscience BC, Report 2012–1, 81–86Google Scholar
  4. Fang X, Pomeroy JW (2007) Snowmelt runoff sensitivity analysis to drought on the Canadian prairies. Hydrol Process 21:2594–2609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Google Earth 7.1.8.3036 (32-bit). July 11, (2014) Blueberry river watershed, British Columbia, Canada. 56.96°N, 121.89°W, http://www.google.com/earth/index.html, Accessed 13 Mar 2017
  6. Google Earth 7.1.8.3036 (32-bit). December 30, (2015) Graham river watershed, British Columbia, Canada. 56.42°N, 122.51°W, http://www.google.com/earth/index.html, Accessed 13 March 2017
  7. Kniewasser, M. and M. Horne (2015) ‘B.C. shale scenario tool technical report’, Pembina institute, pp. 30. Downloaded from http://www.pembina.org/reports/pembina-bc-shale-scenario-tool-technical-report-20150618.pdf January 2017
  8. Pacific Climate Impacts Consortium (2014) Statistically downscaled climate scenarios. Downloaded from http://tools.pacificclimate.org/dataportal/downscaled_gcms/map/ September 2016
  9. Pomeroy JW, Gray DM, Brown T, Hedstrom NR, Quinton WL, Granger RJ, Carey SK (2007) The cold regions hydrological model: a platform for basin process representation and model structure on physical evidence. Hydrol Process 21:2650–2667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pomeroy J, Fang X, Ellis C (2012) Sensitivity of snowmelt hydrology in Marmot Creek, Alberta, to forest cover disturbance. Hydrol Process 26:1891–1904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rivard C, Lavoie D, Lefebvre R, Séjourné S, Lamontagne C, Duchesne M (2014) An overview of Canadian shale gas production and environmental concerns. Int J Coal Geol 126:64–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer R. Dierauer
    • 1
  • Diana M. Allen
    • 1
  • Paul H. Whitfield
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  2. 2.Centre for HydrologyUniversity of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations