Skip to main content

Use of Bayesian Networks for System Reliability Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
System Performance and Management Analytics

Part of the book series: Asset Analytics ((ASAN))

  • 1424 Accesses

Abstract

Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) is a technique to quantify the risk associated with complex systems like Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs), chemical industries, aerospace industry, etc. PSA aims at identifying the possible undesirable scenarios that could occur in a plant, along with the likelihood of their occurrence and the consequences associated with them. PSA of NPPs is generally performed through Fault Tree (FT) and Event Tree (ET) approach. FTs are used to evaluate the unavailability or frequency of failure of various systems in the plant, especially those that are safety critical. Some of the limitations of FTs and ETs are consideration of constant failure/repair data for components. Also, the dependency between the component failures is handled in a very conservative manner using beta factor, alpha factors, etc. Recently, the trend is shifting toward the development of Bayesian Network (BN) model of FTs. BNs are directed acyclic graphs and work on the principles of probability theory. The paper highlights how to develop BN from FT and how it can be used to develop a BN model of the FT of Isolation Condenser (IC) of the advanced reactor and incorporate the system component indicator status into the BN. The indicator status would act like evidence to the basic events, thus updating their probabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Development and Application of Level 1 Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Nuclear power plants, Specific Safety Guide, IAEA, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cepin, M. (2015). Evolution of probabilistic safety assessment and its application in nuclear power plants. In IEEE International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies (pp. 53–60).

    Google Scholar 

  3. NUREG-0492. (1981). Fault tree handbook. USNRC.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fault Tree Handbook with Aerospace Applications, NASA Publication, August 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Przytula, K. W., & Milford, R. (2006). An efficient framework for the conversion of fault trees to diagnostic Bayesian network models. In IEEE Aerospace Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bobbio, A., Portinale, L., Minichino, M., & Ciancamerla, E. (2001). Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 71, 249–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamza, Z., & Abdallah, T. (2015). Mapping fault tree into Bayesian network in safety analysis of process system. In IEEE International Conference on Electrical Engineering (ICEE).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao, Y., Wen, J., Xiao, F., Yang, X., & Wang, S. (2017). Diagnostic Bayesian networks for diagnosing air handling units faults—Part I: Faults in dampers, fans, filters and sensors. Applied Thermal Engineering, 111, 1272–1286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cai, B., Liu, H., & Xie, M. (2016). A real-time fault diagnosis methodology of complex systems using object-oriented Bayesian networks. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 80, 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lampis, M., & Andrews, J. D. (2008). Bayesian belief networks for system fault diagnostics. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 25, 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. IAEA-TECDOC-478. (1988). Component reliability data for use in probabilistic safety assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  12. He, S., Wang, Z., Wang, Z., Gu, X., & Yan, Z. (2016). Fault detection and diagnosis of chiller using Bayesian network classifier with probabilistic boundary. Applied Thermal Engineering, 107, 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. http://ai.stanford.edu/~paskin/gm-short-course/lec2.pdf.

  14. Netica Application, Norsys Software Corporation (limited mode version). https://www.norsys.com/netica.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vipul Garg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Garg, V., Hari Prasad, M., Vinod, G., RamaRao, A. (2019). Use of Bayesian Networks for System Reliability Assessment. In: Kapur, P., Klochkov, Y., Verma, A., Singh, G. (eds) System Performance and Management Analytics. Asset Analytics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7323-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics