Enhanced Hierarchical Cluster Based Routing Protocol with Optical Sphere in FSO MANET

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 468)

Abstract

The existing protocols which are used for routing in MANET fail to consider FSO characteristics like the frequent physical link disruption (intermittent connectivity) and the requirement of line of sight (LOS). Hence, a hierarchical routing protocol along with spherical data propagation model is proposed. In this method, first clustering is done based on neighbor discovery algorithm and then cluster head is selected with the help of network source connector. This process provides network with reliable cluster head. After that source transmits packet based on the proposed data propagation model which helps to increase the transmission range and provides clear line of sight for smooth routing in FSO. Varying the number of transceivers as 2, 4, 6, and 8 it is seen that the performance characteristics such as throughput, delivery ratio, drop, and delay is enhanced. Proposed protocol has the advantage of providing high throughput and clear line of sight.

Keywords

Free space optics Mobile ad hoc networks Routing protocol Transceivers 

References

  1. 1.
    Akella J, Liu C, Partyka D, Yuksel M, Kalyanaraman S, Dutta P (2005) Building blocks for mobile free-space-optical networks. In: Proceedings of IFIP/IEEE international conference on wireless and optical communications networks (WOCN), IEEE, pp 164–168Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    SANS Institute InfoSec Reading Room (2002) Free-space optics: a viable, secure last-mile solution? © SANS InstituteGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bilgi M, Yuksel M (2008) Multi-element free-space-optical spherical structures with intermittent connectivity patterns. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom Student Workshop, Phoenix, AZGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mohd Shariff AR, Woodward ME (2007) A delay constrained minimum hop distributed routing algorithm using adaptive path prediction. J Netw 2(3):46–57Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheng G, Ansari N (2004) Finding all hops shortest paths. IEEE Commun Lett 8(2):122–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hu Z, Verma P, Sluss Jr J (2009) Routing in degree-constrained FSO mesh networks. Int J Hybrid Inf Technol 2(2)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mohd Shariff AR, Woodward ME (2007) A delay constrained minimum hop distributed routing algorithm using adaptive path prediction. J Netw 2(3):46–57Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kishore Kumar D, Murthy YSSR (2013) Hybrid cluster based routing protocol for free-space optical mobile ad hoc networks. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bilgi M, Yuksel M (2010) Multi-transceiver simulation modules for free-space optical mobile ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of SPIE 7705. [doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.851756]
  10. 10.
    Nakhkoob B, Bilgi M, Yuksel M, Hella M (2009) Multi-transceiver optical wireless spherical structures for MANETs. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 27(9)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yuksel M, Akella J, Kalyanaraman S, Dutta P (2009) Free-space-optical mobile ad hoc networks: auto-configurable building blocks. ACM Springer Wireless Netw 15:295–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bilgi M, Yuksel M (2014) Capacity scaling in free-space-optical mobile ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Netw (Elsevier) 12:150–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Di W, Alhussein A (2011) Throughput and delay analysis for hybrid radiofrequency and free-space-optical (RF/FSO) networks. Springer Wireless Netw 17:877–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Derenick J, Thorne C, Spletzer J (2005) On the deployment of a hybrid free-space optic/radio frequency (FSO/RF) mobile ad-hoc network. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systemsGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    George D, Sankar SP (2016) Stability routing in FSO-MANET. Int J Res Eng Technol 05Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cheng BN, Yuksel M, Kalyanaraman S (2008) Using directionality in mobile routing. In: IEEE international conference on mobile ad-hoc and sensor systems (MASS)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kashyap A, Rawat A, Shayman M (2006) Integrated backup topology control and routing of obscured traffic in hybrid RF/FSO networks. IEEE GlobecomGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Okorafor UN, Kundur D (2005) Efficient routing protocols for a free space optical sensor network. In: IEEE international conference on mobile adhoc and sensor systems (MASS), pp 251–258, IEEE, Washington DC (2005). [https://doi.org/10.1109/MAHSS.2005.1542807]
  19. 19.
    Kumar DK, Murthy YSSR (2012) Hierarchical routing protocol for free-space optical mobile ad hoc networks (FSO/RF MANET). Int J Comput Appl 60(10):0975–8887Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bilgi M, Yuksel M (2010) Packet-based simulation for optical wireless communication. In: Proceedings of IEEE workshop on local and metropolitan area networks, IEEEGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Asaad Kaadan, Hazem H. Refai, Peter G. LoPresti (2014) Multielement FSO transceivers alignment for inter-UAV communications. J Lightwave Technol 32(24)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Network simulator. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringKCG College of TechnologyChennaiIndia
  2. 2.School of Electronics EngineeringVIT UniversityChennaiIndia
  3. 3.Faculty of Electronics and Communication EngineeringSSN College of EngineeringChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations