Abstract
In performing an efficient emergency response plan, one of the key elements is having a properly designed and well-equipped Emergency Operations Center (EOC). Lack of EOC functionality may even lead to the failure of the whole crisis management plan (CMP). Despite the significance of industrial EOC, there is not any guideline or well-established recommended practice in design and equipping these centers. In this paper, a comprehensive checklist giving recommendations on design and equipping EOCs is presented. Necessities in different fields such as configuration and layout, communication facilities, stationery and office supplies, welfare and eventually procedures are listed. Also, an evaluation method based on weighted scoring technique is offered to examine the functionality of EOC and compare the different design options.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdolhamidzadeh, B., T. Abbasi, D. Rashtchian, and S. Abbasi. 2011. Domino effect in process-industry accidents: An inventory of past events and identification of some patterns. Journal of Loss Prevention 24: 575–593.
Canter, L.W. 1996. Environmental Impact Assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Eldson, G. 2010. EOC facility checklist: Avoiding surprises. Disaster Resource Guide Quarterly 15 (2).
ENISA. 2013. Retrieved from European Union Agency for Network and Information Security. http://www.enisa.europa.eu/activities/risk-management/current-risk/bcm-resilience/glossary/c-d.
Fagel, M.J. 2011. Principle of Emergency Management and Emergency Operations Centers. NW: CRC Press.
Koo, Y.-H., Y.-S. Yang, and K.-W. Song. 2014. Radioavtivity release from the Fukushina accident and its consequences: A review. Progress in Nuclear Energy 74: 61–70.
Mariano, A., V. Kourafalou, A. Srinivasan, H. Kang, G. Halliwel, E. Ryan, et al. 2011. On the modeling of the 2010 Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans 52 (1–2): 322–340.
Meshkati, N. 1991. Human factor in large scale technological systems’ accident: Three Mile Island, Bhopal, Chernobyl. Industrial Quarterly 5: 131–154.
Meshkati, N. 2006. Safety and human factors considerations in control rooms of oil and gas pipeline systems: Conceptual issues and practical observation. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (JOSE) 12 (1): 79–93.
Michigan State Police. 2003. Design recommendations and criteria for emergency operations center. Michigan: Michigan State Police Emergency Management Division.
Shrader, K. 2008. Designing and effective operating center for city of Martinsville, Virginia. Martinsville, Virginia: Fire EMS Department.
Stufflebeam, D.L. 2000. Guidelines for developing evaluation checklists: the checklists development checklist (CDC). Evaluation Check list Project.
Tseng, J., C. Shu, J. Horng, C. Kuan, and H. Hsu. 2007. Planning an emergency respone center in southern Taiwan science park. IChemE.
US Army, C. 2008. Emergency Operation Center Planning and Design. US: US Department of Defence.
Welker, T. 2003. Design component of a modern emergency operation center (EOC) for city of clearwater. Florida: National Fire Academy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: EOC Assessment Checklist
Appendix: EOC Assessment Checklist
D. Configuration and layout
Code | Item | Weight factor | Status | Weighted score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fully meets the criterion | Substantially meets the criterion | Partially meets the criterion | Does not meet the criterion | ||||
D01 | Safety of EOC against consequence of accidents | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D01.1 | Safety against process hazards (i.e., fire, explosion) | 7 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D01.2 | Safety against toxic gas infiltration | 7 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D01.3 | Safety against natural and ecological hazards (i.e., flood, earthquake, …) | 7 |  |  |  |  |  |
D01.3.1 | Resistance of EOC against the most violent flood in the past 500Â years for newly constructed buildings and past 100Â years for existing buildings (UFC 141-01, 3.5.1.3) | 7 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D01.3.2 | Resistance of EOC against the most violent earthquake in the past 100 years (ASTM E2668, Sect. 6.6.1) | 7 |  |  |  |  |  |
D01.3.3 | Resistance of EOC against region-specific natural hazards (i.e., tsunami, volcano, …) | 7 |  |  |  |  |  |
D02 | Proper accessibility to EOC for main members of team | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D03 | Space and environment of EOC | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D03.1 | Height of ceiling (at least 3Â m according to UFC 141-01, 4.2.6.8) | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D03.2 | Specification of proper space per person according to domestic regulations | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D04 | Sound proof walls | 1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D05 | Layout of center furniture | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D05.1 | Assignment of specific area to each group (operation, planning, …) | 3 |  |  |  |  |  |
D05.2 | Existence of enough public area for meetings and gathering | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D05.3 | Proper location of screen display (so everyone can see it easily) | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D05.4 | Proper location of each group (operation, planning, …) | 5 |  |  |  |  |  |
D05.5 | Proper location of entrance | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D05.6 | Specification of each person’s place in the group with name plates | 3 |  |  |  |  |  |
D05.7 | No physical/sonic interference between groups | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D05.8 | Specific and accessible place for documents | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D05.9 | Specific and accessible place for office supplies | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D06 | Assignment of space for rest (sufficient area for 25% of involved persons) | 1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D07 | Dedicated dining area | 1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D08 | Easy access to toilets | 1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D09 | Surveillance system for entrance and exit | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D10 | Protection against internal fire | 7 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
D11 | Firefighting facilities (detectors, portable extinguishers, …) | 7 |  |  |  |  |  |
Sum | Â |
C. Communication facilities
Code | Item | Weight factor | Status | Weighted score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fully meets the criterion | Substantially meets the criterion | Partially meets the criterion | Does not meet the criterion | ||||
C01 | Phones | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C01.1 | Availability of at least one landline for each group) | 7 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C01.2 | Satellite phone | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C01.3 | Ring light phones | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C01.4 | Headset for phones | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C02 | Walkie-talkie with specified radio channel | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C03 | Proper facility for paging and intercom | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C04 | PCs/laptop | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C04.1 | One computer system should be connected to display, and other one should be connected to Internet or intranet | 7 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C04.2 | Computers being used just in EOC (not dual-use) | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C04.3 | Protected by antivirus software | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C04.4 | Proper software installed | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C04.5 | Availability of technical and process data about plant on computers | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C05 | CCTV and recording system (video and voice recording) | 1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C06 | Phone and radio communication recording system | 1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C07 | Television | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C08 | CD/DVD player | 1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C09 | Video projection or LCD (at least three displays are needed for news, operation status, operation command) | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C10 | Internet access | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C11 | Fax (one for receiving and one for sending) | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C12 | Photocopier | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C13 | Online access to weather forecast | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C14 | Display of plants CCTVs | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C15 | Access to control and monitoring systems of plant | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C16 | Emergency phone numbers (internal/external) | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C17 | Megaphone | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C18 | Regional maps | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C19 | Plant layout drawings | 7 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
C20 | Special location’s maps (i.e., nuclear power plants, hospitals,…) | 5 |  |  |  |  |  |
Sum |
A. Stationery and office supplies
Code | Item | Weight factor | Status | Weighted score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fully meets the criterion | Substantially meets the criterion | Partially meets the criterion | Does not meet the criterion | ||||
A01 | Large table for group meetings | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A02 | Specific desk for each group | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A03 | Name plate for team members | 1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A04 | Ergonomic chairs | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A05 | Whiteboard (at least two), whiteboard markers | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A06 | Files for documents | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A07 | Large digital clock | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A08 | Flashlight | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A09 | Spare batteries | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A10 | Diesel generator with fuel for at least two days | 7 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A11 | UPS for all critical apparatuses | 7 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A12 | Office supplies | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A12.01 | Pencil | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A12.02 | Pen | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A12.03 | Paper | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A12.04 | Glue | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A12.05 | Highlight marker | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A12.06 | Folders | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A12.07 | Stapler | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A12.08 | Sticker | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A12.09 | Scissors | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
A12.10 | Punch | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Sum |
W. Welfare
Code | Item | Weight factor | Status | Weighted score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fully meets the criterion | Substantially meets the criterion | Partially meets the criterion | Does not meet the criterion | ||||
W01 | Lighting system | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W01.01 | Lighting system with at least 500Â lx luminous flux per unit area | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W01.02 | Lighting system designed according to UFC 3 530 01 | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W01.03 | Lighting dimmer controller | 1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W02 | Air ventilation system (20 CFM per person) | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W03 | Proper heating system | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W04 | Proper cooling system | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W05 | Enough number of toilets | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W06 | First aid kit | 7 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W07 | Proper PPE for all identified hazards | 7 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W08 | Drinking water storage | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W09 | Dry food storage | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W10 | Glass, plate, and cutlery | 1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W11 | Trash bin | 1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W12 | Proper facilities for rest | 1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W13 | Tissues | 1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W14 | Water dispenser | 1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W15 | Supply for hygiene facilities | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W15.1 | Toothpaste and toothbrush | 1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W15.2 | Towels | 1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
W16 | Fridge, microwave heater | 1 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I. Procedures and audits
Code | Item | Weight factor | Status | Weighted score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fully meets the criterion | Substantially meets the criterion | Partially meets the criterion | Does not meet the criterion | ||||
I01 | Procedures | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I01.1 | Procedure for changing the configuration in case of EOC being dual-use | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I01.2 | Layout of center equipment (in case of being dual-use) | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I01.3 | Procedure for updating any document in EOC in case of any change or periodically | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I01.4 | Procedure for updating emergency phone numbers in case of any change | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I01.5 | Procedure for EOC activation | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I01.6 | Procedure for EOC deactivation | 5 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02 | Regular audit and inspection | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.1 | Inspection of EOC facilities (every 3 months) | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.2 | Inspection of the communication facilities functionality (every 3 months) | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.3 | Inspection of computer and display systems (every 3 months) | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.4 | Inspection of CCTVs and recording systems (every 3 months) | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.5 | Inspection of CD/DVD player (every year) | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.6 | Inspection of Internet connection (every month) | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.7 | Inspection of photocopier and fax devices (every 3 years) | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.8 | Inspection of weather forecast and display system (every month) | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.9 | Checking maps and process documents whether updated or not (every year) | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.10 | Checking internal and external emergency contacts whether updated or not (every year) | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.11 | Checking office supplies, i.e., whiteboard markers, pens, …. (every 3 months) | 3 |  |  |  |  |  |
I02.12 | Checking the digital clock (every 6 months) | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.13 | Making sure that spare batteries are supplied | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.14 | Checking the emergency generator (every 6 months) | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.15 | Checking the UPS (every 6 months) | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.16 | Making sure whether the luminous flux per unit area (LUX) is sufficient in EOC | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.17 | Making sure that ventilation system (including heating and cooling system) is functional | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.18 | Inspection first aid kit (every year) | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.19 | Inspection water and dry food storages (every 6 months) | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.20 | Inspection breathing apparatuses if there is any (every 6 months) | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
I02.21 | Regular training workshop to recall responsibilities, how to activate EOC and how to use the location of EOC facilities and equipment | 3 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Abdolhamidzadeh, B., Rahimi, F., Gharebaghian, T., Nosraty, B., Rashtchian, D. (2018). Evaluating the Functionality of Industrial Emergency Operations Center (EOC) by Weighted Scoring Technique. In: Siddiqui, N., Tauseef, S., Abbasi, S., Rangwala, A. (eds) Advances in Fire and Process Safety. Springer Transactions in Civil and Environmental Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7281-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7281-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7280-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7281-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)