Skip to main content

Evaluating the Functionality of Industrial Emergency Operations Center (EOC) by Weighted Scoring Technique

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Fire and Process Safety

Abstract

In performing an efficient emergency response plan, one of the key elements is having a properly designed and well-equipped Emergency Operations Center (EOC). Lack of EOC functionality may even lead to the failure of the whole crisis management plan (CMP). Despite the significance of industrial EOC, there is not any guideline or well-established recommended practice in design and equipping these centers. In this paper, a comprehensive checklist giving recommendations on design and equipping EOCs is presented. Necessities in different fields such as configuration and layout, communication facilities, stationery and office supplies, welfare and eventually procedures are listed. Also, an evaluation method based on weighted scoring technique is offered to examine the functionality of EOC and compare the different design options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdolhamidzadeh, B., T. Abbasi, D. Rashtchian, and S. Abbasi. 2011. Domino effect in process-industry accidents: An inventory of past events and identification of some patterns. Journal of Loss Prevention 24: 575–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Canter, L.W. 1996. Environmental Impact Assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eldson, G. 2010. EOC facility checklist: Avoiding surprises. Disaster Resource Guide Quarterly 15 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  4. ENISA. 2013. Retrieved from European Union Agency for Network and Information Security. http://www.enisa.europa.eu/activities/risk-management/current-risk/bcm-resilience/glossary/c-d.

  5. Fagel, M.J. 2011. Principle of Emergency Management and Emergency Operations Centers. NW: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Koo, Y.-H., Y.-S. Yang, and K.-W. Song. 2014. Radioavtivity release from the Fukushina accident and its consequences: A review. Progress in Nuclear Energy 74: 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mariano, A., V. Kourafalou, A. Srinivasan, H. Kang, G. Halliwel, E. Ryan, et al. 2011. On the modeling of the 2010 Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans 52 (1–2): 322–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Meshkati, N. 1991. Human factor in large scale technological systems’ accident: Three Mile Island, Bhopal, Chernobyl. Industrial Quarterly 5: 131–154.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meshkati, N. 2006. Safety and human factors considerations in control rooms of oil and gas pipeline systems: Conceptual issues and practical observation. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (JOSE) 12 (1): 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Michigan State Police. 2003. Design recommendations and criteria for emergency operations center. Michigan: Michigan State Police Emergency Management Division.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shrader, K. 2008. Designing and effective operating center for city of Martinsville, Virginia. Martinsville, Virginia: Fire EMS Department.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stufflebeam, D.L. 2000. Guidelines for developing evaluation checklists: the checklists development checklist (CDC). Evaluation Check list Project.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tseng, J., C. Shu, J. Horng, C. Kuan, and H. Hsu. 2007. Planning an emergency respone center in southern Taiwan science park. IChemE.

    Google Scholar 

  14. US Army, C. 2008. Emergency Operation Center Planning and Design. US: US Department of Defence.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Welker, T. 2003. Design component of a modern emergency operation center (EOC) for city of clearwater. Florida: National Fire Academy.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahman Abdolhamidzadeh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: EOC Assessment Checklist

Appendix: EOC Assessment Checklist

D. Configuration and layout

Code

Item

Weight factor

Status

Weighted score

Fully meets the criterion

Substantially meets the criterion

Partially meets the criterion

Does not meet the criterion

D01

Safety of EOC against consequence of accidents

      

D01.1

Safety against process hazards (i.e., fire, explosion)

7

     

D01.2

Safety against toxic gas infiltration

7

     

D01.3

Safety against natural and ecological hazards (i.e., flood, earthquake, …)

7

     

D01.3.1

Resistance of EOC against the most violent flood in the past 500 years for newly constructed buildings and past 100 years for existing buildings (UFC 141-01, 3.5.1.3)

7

     

D01.3.2

Resistance of EOC against the most violent earthquake in the past 100 years (ASTM E2668, Sect. 6.6.1)

7

     

D01.3.3

Resistance of EOC against region-specific natural hazards (i.e., tsunami, volcano, …)

7

     

D02

Proper accessibility to EOC for main members of team

5

     

D03

Space and environment of EOC

      

D03.1

Height of ceiling (at least 3 m according to UFC 141-01, 4.2.6.8)

3

     

D03.2

Specification of proper space per person according to domestic regulations

3

     

D04

Sound proof walls

1

     

D05

Layout of center furniture

      

D05.1

Assignment of specific area to each group (operation, planning, …)

3

     

D05.2

Existence of enough public area for meetings and gathering

3

     

D05.3

Proper location of screen display (so everyone can see it easily)

5

     

D05.4

Proper location of each group (operation, planning, …)

5

     

D05.5

Proper location of entrance

3

     

D05.6

Specification of each person’s place in the group with name plates

3

     

D05.7

No physical/sonic interference between groups

3

     

D05.8

Specific and accessible place for documents

5

     

D05.9

Specific and accessible place for office supplies

3

     

D06

Assignment of space for rest (sufficient area for 25% of involved persons)

1

     

D07

Dedicated dining area

1

     

D08

Easy access to toilets

1

     

D09

Surveillance system for entrance and exit

3

     

D10

Protection against internal fire

7

     

D11

Firefighting facilities (detectors, portable extinguishers, …)

7

     

Sum

 

C. Communication facilities

Code

Item

Weight factor

Status

Weighted score

Fully meets the criterion

Substantially meets the criterion

Partially meets the criterion

Does not meet the criterion

C01

Phones

      

C01.1

Availability of at least one landline for each group)

7

     

C01.2

Satellite phone

5

     

C01.3

Ring light phones

3

     

C01.4

Headset for phones

3

     

C02

Walkie-talkie with specified radio channel

5

     

C03

Proper facility for paging and intercom

3

     

C04

PCs/laptop

      

C04.1

One computer system should be connected to display, and other one should be connected to Internet or intranet

7

     

C04.2

Computers being used just in EOC (not dual-use)

3

     

C04.3

Protected by antivirus software

3

     

C04.4

Proper software installed

5

     

C04.5

Availability of technical and process data about plant on computers

5

     

C05

CCTV and recording system (video and voice recording)

1

     

C06

Phone and radio communication recording system

1

     

C07

Television

3

     

C08

CD/DVD player

1

     

C09

Video projection or LCD (at least three displays are needed for news, operation status, operation command)

5

     

C10

Internet access

5

     

C11

Fax (one for receiving and one for sending)

3

     

C12

Photocopier

3

     

C13

Online access to weather forecast

3

     

C14

Display of plants CCTVs

3

     

C15

Access to control and monitoring systems of plant

3

     

C16

Emergency phone numbers (internal/external)

5

     

C17

Megaphone

3

     

C18

Regional maps

5

     

C19

Plant layout drawings

7

     

C20

Special location’s maps (i.e., nuclear power plants, hospitals,…)

5

     

Sum

A. Stationery and office supplies

Code

Item

Weight factor

Status

Weighted score

Fully meets the criterion

Substantially meets the criterion

Partially meets the criterion

Does not meet the criterion

A01

Large table for group meetings

3

     

A02

Specific desk for each group

5

     

A03

Name plate for team members

1

     

A04

Ergonomic chairs

3

     

A05

Whiteboard (at least two), whiteboard markers

5

     

A06

Files for documents

5

     

A07

Large digital clock

5

     

A08

Flashlight

3

     

A09

Spare batteries

3

     

A10

Diesel generator with fuel for at least two days

7

     

A11

UPS for all critical apparatuses

7

     

A12

Office supplies

      

A12.01

Pencil

5

     

A12.02

Pen

5

     

A12.03

Paper

5

     

A12.04

Glue

3

     

A12.05

Highlight marker

3

     

A12.06

Folders

3

     

A12.07

Stapler

3

     

A12.08

Sticker

3

     

A12.09

Scissors

3

     

A12.10

Punch

3

     

Sum

W. Welfare

Code

Item

Weight factor

Status

Weighted score

Fully meets the criterion

Substantially meets the criterion

Partially meets the criterion

Does not meet the criterion

W01

Lighting system

      

W01.01

Lighting system with at least 500 lx luminous flux per unit area

5

     

W01.02

Lighting system designed according to UFC 3 530 01

5

     

W01.03

Lighting dimmer controller

1

     

W02

Air ventilation system (20 CFM per person)

5

     

W03

Proper heating system

5

     

W04

Proper cooling system

5

     

W05

Enough number of toilets

3

     

W06

First aid kit

7

     

W07

Proper PPE for all identified hazards

7

     

W08

Drinking water storage

3

     

W09

Dry food storage

3

     

W10

Glass, plate, and cutlery

1

     

W11

Trash bin

1

     

W12

Proper facilities for rest

1

     

W13

Tissues

1

     

W14

Water dispenser

1

     

W15

Supply for hygiene facilities

      

W15.1

Toothpaste and toothbrush

1

     

W15.2

Towels

1

     

W16

Fridge, microwave heater

1

     

I. Procedures and audits

Code

Item

Weight factor

Status

Weighted score

Fully meets the criterion

Substantially meets the criterion

Partially meets the criterion

Does not meet the criterion

I01

Procedures

      

I01.1

Procedure for changing the configuration in case of EOC being dual-use

5

     

I01.2

Layout of center equipment (in case of being dual-use)

5

     

I01.3

Procedure for updating any document in EOC in case of any change or periodically

5

     

I01.4

Procedure for updating emergency phone numbers in case of any change

5

     

I01.5

Procedure for EOC activation

5

     

I01.6

Procedure for EOC deactivation

5

     

I02

Regular audit and inspection

      

I02.1

Inspection of EOC facilities (every 3 months)

3

     

I02.2

Inspection of the communication facilities functionality (every 3 months)

3

     

I02.3

Inspection of computer and display systems (every 3 months)

3

     

I02.4

Inspection of CCTVs and recording systems (every 3 months)

3

     

I02.5

Inspection of CD/DVD player (every year)

3

     

I02.6

Inspection of Internet connection (every month)

3

     

I02.7

Inspection of photocopier and fax devices (every 3 years)

3

     

I02.8

Inspection of weather forecast and display system (every month)

3

     

I02.9

Checking maps and process documents whether updated or not (every year)

3

     

I02.10

Checking internal and external emergency contacts whether updated or not (every year)

3

     

I02.11

Checking office supplies, i.e., whiteboard markers, pens, …. (every 3 months)

3

     

I02.12

Checking the digital clock (every 6 months)

3

     

I02.13

Making sure that spare batteries are supplied

3

     

I02.14

Checking the emergency generator (every 6 months)

3

     

I02.15

Checking the UPS (every 6 months)

3

     

I02.16

Making sure whether the luminous flux per unit area (LUX) is sufficient in EOC

3

     

I02.17

Making sure that ventilation system (including heating and cooling system) is functional

3

     

I02.18

Inspection first aid kit (every year)

3

     

I02.19

Inspection water and dry food storages (every 6 months)

3

     

I02.20

Inspection breathing apparatuses if there is any (every 6 months)

3

     

I02.21

Regular training workshop to recall responsibilities, how to activate EOC and how to use the location of EOC facilities and equipment

3

     

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abdolhamidzadeh, B., Rahimi, F., Gharebaghian, T., Nosraty, B., Rashtchian, D. (2018). Evaluating the Functionality of Industrial Emergency Operations Center (EOC) by Weighted Scoring Technique. In: Siddiqui, N., Tauseef, S., Abbasi, S., Rangwala, A. (eds) Advances in Fire and Process Safety. Springer Transactions in Civil and Environmental Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7281-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7281-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7280-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7281-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics