Publishing and Presenting Research Photographs

  • Sten Langmann
  • David Pick


The aim of this concluding chapter is to examine, with examples, the various ways that photographic research can be presented for publication. The focus is first on the use of multiple photographs with vignettes to explain social phenomena and second photo-narrative that is a series of photographs that together describe a complex social situation. These approaches are then shown in the context of conference presentation and the writing of research papers for publication. This chapter also examines the sometimes difficult to navigate problem of copyright. This is especially relevant when researchers might want to re-use already published photos of their own or those produced by others.


Publishing Photo-narratives Conference Copyright Creative commons 


  1. Australian Law Reform Commission. (2013a). Copyright and the digital economy. Retrieved from
  2. Australian Law Reform Commission. (2013b). Copyright and the digital economy council directive no. 93/98/EEC of 29 October 1993 harmonizing the term of protection of copyright and certain related rights.Google Scholar
  3. Baetens, J. (1995). John Berger and Jean Mohr: From photography to photo narrative. History of Photography, 19(4), 283–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baetens, J., & Ribière, M. (1995). The Calaceite conference on photo narrative. History of Photography, 19(4), 314–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banks, M., & Zeitlyn, D. (2015). Visual methods in social research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, S. E. (2002). Photo images: Jo Spence’s narratives of living with illness. Health, 6(1), 5–30.Google Scholar
  7. Cantatore, F., & Johnston, J. (2016). Moral rights: Exploring the myths, meanings and misunderstandings in Australian copyright law. Deakin Law Review, 21(1), 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clergue, L. (1980). Lucien Clergue: langage des sables. USA: AGEP.Google Scholar
  9. Copyright Amendment (Moral Rights) Act (Cth). (2000). Google Scholar
  10. Creative Commons. (2017a). Learn about CC. Retrieved from
  11. Creative Commons. (2017b). About the licences. Retrieved from
  12. Deazley, R. (2007). Copyright’s public domain. In C. MacQueen & H. Waelde (Eds.), Intellectual property: The many faces of the public domain. (pp. 21–34). UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  13. Erickson, K., Heald, P., Homberg, F., Kretschmer, M., & Mendis, D. (2015). Copyright and the value of the public domain: An empirical assessment. Intellectual Property Office Research Paper, 2015 Forthcoming; University of Illinois College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 15–16. Available at SSRN:
  14. Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (2007). Composing qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall, J. A., Coats, E. J., & LeBeau, L. S. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 898–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harington, R. (2017). The value of copyright: A publisher’s perspective. Retrieved from
  17. Holm, G. (2014). Photography as a Research Method. In P. Levy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 380–402). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hugenholtz, P. B. (2013). Law and technology fair use in Europe. Communications of the ACM, 56(5), 26–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Intellectual Property Office. (2014). Exceptions to copyright. Retrieved from
  20. Jacobs, S. (2016). The effect of the 1886 Berne convention on the US copyright system’s treatment of moral rights and copyright term, and where that leaves us today. Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review, 23(1), 169–190.Google Scholar
  21. Jessop, M. (2008). Digital visualization as a scholarly activity. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 23(3), 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Joanou, J. P. (2009). The bad and the ugly: Ethical concerns in participatory photographic methods with children living and working on the streets of Lima. Peru. Visual Studies, 24(3), 214–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Katsarova, I. (2015). The challenges of copyright in the EU. EPRS|European Parliamentary Research Service, 1–12.Google Scholar
  24. Kuhlen, R. (2013). Copyright issues in the European Union: towards a science-and education-friendly copyright. Retrieved from
  25. Langmann, S. (2014). NGOs and poverty reduction in Tamil Nadu: Exploring a knowledge-sharing for development framework. Western Australia: Curtin University.Google Scholar
  26. Langmann, S., & Pick, D. (2014). Dignity and ethics in research photography. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17(6), 709–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lessig, L. (2006). Re-crafting a public domain. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 18(3), 56–83.Google Scholar
  28. Margoni, T. (2016). The harmonisation of EU copyright law: the originality standard. In Global Governance of Intellectual Property in the 21st Century (pp. 85–105). Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Markham, A. (2012). Fair use of images in scholarly publishing. Retrieved from
  30. Morris, R. G. (1992). Use of copyrighted images in academic scholarship and creative work: The problems of new technologies and a proposed scholarly license. IDEA, 33, 123.Google Scholar
  31. Newbury, D. (2011). Making arguments with images: Visual scholarship and academic publishing. In E. Margolis, & Luc Pauwels (Eds.), The sage handbook of visual research methods. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Olsen, S. W. (2017). Single frame narrative photography: An essay. Retrieved from
  33. Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  34. Rose, G. (2007). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Rowe, J. (2011). Legal issues of using images in research. In E. Margolis & Luc Pauwels (Eds.) The Sage handbook of visual methods (pp. 707–722). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Rowe, W. (1995). The wordless doctoral dissertation: Photography as scholarship. The Cal Poly Pomona Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 8, 21–30.Google Scholar
  37. Rowley-Jolivet, E. (2002). Visual discourse in scientific conference papers A genre-based study. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scott, G. (2016). The single image narrative: Sometimes it chooses you. United Nations of Photography.Google Scholar
  39. Soutter, L. (2000). Dial” P” for panties: Narrative photography in the 1990s. Afterimage, 27(4), 9–12.Google Scholar
  40. Speidel, K. (2013). Can a single still picture tell a story? Definitions of narrative and the alleged problem of time with single still pictures. Diegesis, 2(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  41. Stim, R. (2010). Welcome to the public domain. Standford University Libraries. Retrieved from
  42. Taubman, A. S. (2007). The public domain and international intellectual property law treaties. In C. Waelde, H. L. MacQueen (Eds.), Intellectual property: The many faces of the public domain (pp. 53–85). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Tiemens, R. K. (1970). Some relationships of camera angle to communicator credibility. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 14(4), 483–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. U.S. Constitution (Vol. 17 USC). Google Scholar
  45. Warren, S. (2005). Photography and voice in critical qualitative management research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(6), 861–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wiles, R., Clark, A., & Prosser, J. (2011). Visual research ethics at the crossroads. In J. Hughes (Ed.), Sage visual methods volume I: Principles, issues, debates and controversies in visual research. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  47. Winton, A. (2016). Using photography as a creative, Collaborative Research Tool. The Qualitative Report, 21(2), 428.Google Scholar
  48. Zhou, Y. (2014). Moral Rights in the Information Society. Beijing Law Review, 5, 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Curtin Business SchoolPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations