Advertisement

Research Photography Is…

  • Sten Langmann
  • David Pick
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter introduces the utility of photography in social research and outlines different data collection methods that researchers can employ. The power of the photograph is discussed and then questions about representation are examined. The idea of the photograph as a ‘fold’ is proposed as one way of helping to integrate varying perspectives on the issue of representation. An examination of commonly used photographic research methods is presented that explains their uses and relative strengths and weaknesses. A new approach is proposed called the ‘snapshot’ that provides opportunities for gaining new and unique insights into people’s lives. The chapter concludes with an examination of the emic and etic qualities of research photography and why this matters.

Keywords

Research methods Representation Unfolding Snapshot Social research Emic Etic 

References

  1. Aubusson, K. (2015, August 21). The story behind the heartbreaking photo of refugee family shared by thousands. The Sydney Morning Herald.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, L. (2009). ‘Snapped’: Researching the sexual cultures of schools using visual methods. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(5), 549–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, Q. (2012). Photographs and stories: Ethics, benefits and dilemmas of using participant photography with Black middle-class male youth. Qualitative Research, 12(4), 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, Q. (2016). ‘Tell your own story’: Manhood, masculinity and racial socialization among black fathers and their sons. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(10), 1831–1848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amerson, R., & Livingston, W. G. (2014). Reflexive photography: An alternative method for documenting the learning process of cultural competence. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 25(2), 202–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banks, M. (2001). Visual methods in social research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Bateson, G., & Mead, M. (1942). Balinese character: A photographic analysis. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  8. Baum, F., MacDougall, C., & Smith, D. (2006). Glossary: Participatory action research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1979-), 60(10), 854–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Becker, H. S. (1974). Photography and sociology. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication, 1(1), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bell, E., & Davison, J. (2013). Visual management studies: Empirical and theoretical approaches. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(2), 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berger, J. (1968). Understanding a photograph. New Society, 12(316), 572–573.Google Scholar
  12. Berreman, G. D. (1966). Anemic and emetic analyses in social anthropology. American Anthropologist, 68(2), 346–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bignante, E. (2010). The use of photo-elicitation in field research. Exploring Maasai representations and use of natural resources. EchoGéo, 11, doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/echogeo.11622.
  14. Bolton, A., Pole, C., & Mizen, P. (2001). Picture this: Researching child workers. Sociology, 35(2), 501–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boxall, K., & Ralph, S. (2009). Research ethics and the use of visual images in research with people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 34(1), 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brekke, J.-P. (2003). Photography as tool in social research. Institute for Social Research, 11, 1–5.Google Scholar
  17. Bridger, L. (2013). Seeing and telling households: A case for photo elicitation and graphic elicitation in qualitative research graduate. Journal of social Science, 10(2), 106–131.Google Scholar
  18. Brummitt, W. (1973). Photography is. U.S.: Amphoto Books.Google Scholar
  19. Burgin, V. (1982). Looking at photographs. In V. Burgin (Ed.), Thinking photography (Vol. 1, pp. 142–153, Vol. 2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Byrne, E., Daykin, N., & Coad, J. (2016). Participatory photography in qualitative research: A methodological review. Visual Methodologies, 4(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
  21. Cartier-Bresson, H. (1952). The decisive moment: Photography by Henri Cartier-Bresson. Si Mon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  22. Catalani, C., & Minkler, M. (2010). Photovoice: A review of the literature in health and public health. Health Education & Behavior, 37(3), 424–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chaplin, E. (2002). Sociology and visual representation. Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Chapman, M. V., Wu, S., & Zhu, M. (2016). What is a picture worth? A primer for coding and interpreting photographic data. Qualitative Social Work, 1–15.Google Scholar
  25. Chapman, T. K. (2005). Expressions of “voice” in portraiture. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(1), 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Clark-Ibáñez, M. (2004). Framing the social world with photo-elicitation interviews. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(12), 1507–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Close, H. (2007). The use of photography as a qualitative research tool: With reference to her own study of children with long-term conditions, Helen Close considers whether photography as a research method can be both valuable and ethical. Nurse Researcher, 15(1), 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Coe, B., & Gates, P. (1977). The Snapshot photograph: The rise of popular photography, 1888–1939. University of California, Ash & Grant.Google Scholar
  29. Collier, J. (1957). Photography in anthropology: A report on two experiments. American Anthropologist, 59(5), 843–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Collier, J., & Collier, M. (1986). Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. Albuquerque: University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  31. Cope, V., Jones, B., & Hendricks, J. (2015). Portraiture: A methodology through which success and positivity can be explored and reflected. Nurse Researcher, 22(3), 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Coulter, G. (2013). Gerhard Richter’s use of photography to challenge our understanding of the real. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 2(10), 83–92.Google Scholar
  33. Covert, H. H., & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2015). Layers of narratives, images, and analysis. Qualitative Research Journal, 15(3), 306–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dados, N. (2010). Liminal transformations: Folding the surface of the photograph. Conserveries mémorielles. Revue transdisciplinaire, 7, 1–16.Google Scholar
  35. Davies, D. (2008). How photographs “signify”: Cartier-Bresson’s “reply” to Scruton (pp. 167–186). Photography and philosophy: Essays on the pencil of nature.Google Scholar
  36. Deleuze, G. (1993). The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  37. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Dixson, A. D., Chapman, T. K., & Hill, D. A. (2005). Research as an aesthetic process: Extending the portraiture methodology. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(1), 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. East, L., Jackson, D., O’Brien, L., & Peters, K. (2010). Storytelling: an approach that can help to develop resilience: Relating personal experiences can help participants to cope with their conditions and improve research, explain Leah East, Debra Jackson, Louise O’Brien and Kathleen Peters. Nurse Researcher, 17(3), 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Evans-Agnew, R. A., & Rosemberg, M.-A. S. (2016). Questioning photovoice research: Whose voice? Qualitative Health Research, 26(8), 1019–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Felstead, A., Jewson, N., & Walters, S. (2004). Images, interviews and interpretations: Making connections in visual research. In C. J. Pole (Ed.), Seeing is believing? Approaches to visual research (Vol. 7, pp. 105–121). Burlington: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  42. Fitzgerald, M. (2015, August 18). An entire country’s pain captured in one father’s face. Syrian refugee family arrives at Kos. Pic by @DanielEtterFoto [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/maryfitzger/status/633704828217241601.
  43. Flusser, V. (1983). Towards a philosophy of photography. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  44. Freshwater, D., & Rolfe, G. (2001). Critical reflexivity: A politically and ethically engaged research method for nursing. NT Research, 6(1), 526–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Goessling, K., & Doyle, C. (2009). Thru the Lenz: Participatory action research, photography, and creative process in an urban high school. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 4(4), 343–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gothóni, R. (2015). Emic, etic and ethics. Some remarks on studying a foreign religion. Studia Orientalia Helsinki, 50, 29–41.Google Scholar
  47. Hannes, K., & Parylo, O. (2014). Let’s play it safe: Ethical considerations from participants in a photovoice research project. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Harley, A. (2012). Picturing reality: Power, ethics, and politics in using photovoice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), 320–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harper, D. (1988). Visual sociology: Expanding sociological vision. The American Sociologist, 19(1), 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Harrington, C. E., & Schibik, T. J. (2003). Reflexive photography as an alternative method for the study of the freshman year experience. NASPA Journal, 41(1), 23–40.Google Scholar
  52. He, J., & van de Vijver, F. J. (2017). Choosing an adequate design and analysis in cross-cultural personality research. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 3(1).Google Scholar
  53. Heisley, D. D., & Levy, S. J. (1991). Autodriving: A photoelicitation technique. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3), 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Higgins, J. (2013). Why it does not have to be in focus: Modern photography explained. Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  55. Higgins, M. (2016). Placing photovoice under erasure: A critical and complicit engagement with what it theoretically is (not). International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(5), 670–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hill, L. (2014). ‘Some of it I haven’t told anybody else’: Using photo elicitation to explore the experiences of secondary school education from the perspective of young people with a diagnosis of autistic spectrum disorder. Educational and Child Psychology, 31(1), 79–89.Google Scholar
  57. Hirsch, R. (1992). Nathan Lyons on the Snapshot. CEPA, Winter 1992–1993, 6–9.Google Scholar
  58. Hurworth, R. (2004). Photo-interviewing. Qualitative Research Journal, 4(1), 73–79.Google Scholar
  59. Johnsen, S., May, J., & Cloke, P. (2008). Imag (in) ing ‘homeless places’: Using auto-photography to (re) examine the geographies of homelessness. Area, 40(2), 194–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Johnston, G. (2016). Champions for social change: Photovoice ethics in practice and ‘false hopes’ for policy and social change. Global Public Health, 11(5–6), 799–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kanstrup, A. M. (2002). Picture the practice—Using photography to explore use of technology within teachers’ work practices. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2), Art. 17.Google Scholar
  62. Keene, D. E., & Padilla, M. B. (2014). Spatial stigma and health inequality. Critical Public Health, 24(4), 392–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lapenta, F. (2011). Some theoretical and methodological views on photo-elicitation. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The Sage handbook of visual research methods (pp. 201–214). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Latham, A. (2004). Researching and writing everyday accounts of the city: An introduction to the diary-photo diary-interview method. Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (1983). The good high school: Portraits of character and culture. Basic Books.Google Scholar
  66. Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (1986). On goodness in schools: Themes of empowerment. Peabody Journal of Education, 63(3), 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (2005). Reflections on portraiture: A dialogue between art and science. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lawrence-Lightfoot, S., & Davis, J. H. (1997). The art and science of portraiture. Jossey-Bass Incorporated Pub.Google Scholar
  69. Lomax, Y. (1995). Folds in the photograph. Third Text, 9(32), 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lorenz, L. S., & Kolb, B. (2009). Involving the public through participatory visual research methods. Health Expectations, 12(3), 262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Marks, L. U. (2008). Experience—Information—Image: A historiography of unfolding. Arab cinema as example. Cultural Studies Review, 14(1), 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Meo, A. I. (2010). Picturing students’ habitus: The advantages and limitations of photo-elicitation interviewing in a qualitative study in the city of Buenos Aires. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9(2), 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Miller, K. (2015). Dear Critics: Addressing concerns and justifying the benefits of photography as a research method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16(3), Art. 27.Google Scholar
  74. Minkler, M. (2004). Ethical challenges for the “outside” researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Education & Behavior, 31(6), 684–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Mitchell, C., de Lange, N., & Nguyen, X. T. (2016). Visual ethics with and through the body: The participation of girls with disabilities in Vietnam in a photovoice project. In Learning Bodies (pp. 241–257). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Morris, M. W., Leung, K., Ames, D., & Lickel, B. (1999). Views from inside and outside: Integrating emic and etic insights about culture and justice judgment. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 781–796.Google Scholar
  77. Munir, K. A., & Phillips, N. (2005). The birth of the ‘Kodak Moment’: Institutional entrepreneurship and the adoption of new technologies. Organization Studies, 26(11), 1665–1687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ngunjiri, F. W. (2007). Painting a counter-narrative of African womanhood: Reflections on how my research transformed me. Journal of Research Practice, 3(1), 4.Google Scholar
  79. Nickel, D. R. (2000). Roland Barthes and the snapshot. History of Photography, 24(3), 232–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Noland, C. M. (2006). Auto-photography as research practice: Identity and self-esteem research. Journal of Research Practice, 2(1), 1.Google Scholar
  81. O’Brien, P. (2015, August 19). All the words and TV reporting of the refugee crisis in a single photo. Humbled by @DanielEtterFoto [Tweet]. https://twitter.com/paraicobrien/status/633935385882697728.
  82. Packard, J. (2008). ‘I’m gonna show you what it’s really like out here’: The power and limitation of participatory visual methods. Visual Studies, 23(1), 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Padgett, D. K., Smith, B. T., Derejko, K.-S., Henwood, B. F., & Tiderington, E. (2013). A picture is worth…? Photo elicitation interviewing with formerly homeless adults. Qualitative Health Research, 23(11), 1435–1444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Parker, L. D. (2009). Photo-elicitation: An ethno-historical accounting and management research prospect. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(7), 1111–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Peters, M., & Mergen, B. (1977). “Doing the rest”: The uses of photographs in American studies. American Quarterly, 29(3), 280–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Pike, K. L. (1954). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  87. Plummer, S. (2015). Photography as expanding form: Virtual and actual expansion in the work of Saron Hughes and Martina Corry. Photographies, 8(2), 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Plunkett, R., Leipert, B. D., & Ray, S. L. (2013). Unspoken phenomena: Using the photovoice method to enrich phenomenological inquiry. Nursing Inquiry, 20(2), 156–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Radley, A., Hodgetts, D., & Cullen, A. (2005). Visualizing homelessness: A study in photography and estrangement. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 15(4), 273–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Ray, J. L., & Smith, Anne D. (2011). Worth a thousand words: Photographs as a novel methodological tool in strategic management. In Building Methodological (Ed.), Bridges (pp. 289–326). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  91. Richard, V. M., & Lahman, M. K. (2015). Photo-elicitation: Reflexivity on method, analysis, and graphic portraits. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 38(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Richter, G. (1995). The daily practice of painting: Writings and interviews 1962–1993 (H. U. Obrist, & D. Britt, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, in association with Anthony d’Offay Gallery, London.Google Scholar
  93. Roberts, B. (2011). Photographic portraits: Narrative and memory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(2), Art. 6.Google Scholar
  94. Rose, G. (2000). Practising photography: An archive, a study, some photographs and a researcher. Journal of Historical Geography, 26(4), 555–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Rose, G. (2007). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  96. Ryan, L., & Mackinnon, S. L. (2016). Photovoice: Through the lens-a case study. Youth Engagement in Health Promotion, 1(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
  97. Schroeder, J. E. (2012). Style and strategy: Snapshot aesthetics in brand culture. In P. Quattrone, N. Thrift, C. Mclean, & F.-R. Puyou (Eds.), Imagining organizations: Performative imagery in business and beyond. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  98. Schulze, S. (2007). The usefulness of reflexive photography for qualitative research: A case study in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21(5), 536–553.Google Scholar
  99. Schwartz, D. (1989). Visual ethnography: Using photography in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 12(2), 119–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Scruton, R. (1981). Photography and representation. Critical Inquiry, 7(3), 577–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Seligman, M. (1991). Learned optimism (cultural studies review). New York: AA Knopf.Google Scholar
  102. Smith, C. Z., & Woodward, A.-M. (1998). Photo-elicitation method gives voice and reactions of subjects. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 53(4), 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Soszynski, M. (2006). How do pictures represent? Philosophy Now, 57, 20–21.Google Scholar
  104. Spencer, S. (2011). Visual research methods in the social sciences: Awakening visions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  105. Strack, R. W., Magill, C., & McDonagh, K. (2004). Engaging youth through photovoice. Health Promotion Practice, 5(1), 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Tanjasiri, S. P., Lew, R., Kuratani, D. G., Wong, M., & Fu, L. (2011). Using Photovoice to assess and promote environmental approaches to tobacco control in AAPI communities. Health Promotion Practice, 12(5), 654–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tinkler, P. (2014). Getting started: Using photos in research. Using photographs in social and historical research (pp. 3–27). London: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Torre, D., & Murphy, J. (2015). A different lens: Using photo-elicitation interviews in education research. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(111), 1–26.Google Scholar
  109. Van House, N. A. (2006). Interview viz: Visualization-assisted photo elicitation. In CHI’06 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, Montreal, Quebac, Canada, 2006 (pp. 1463–1468). ACM.Google Scholar
  110. Wallace, L. (2015). Reflexive photography, attitudes, behavior, and CALL: ITAs improving spoken English intelligibility. Calico Journal, 32(3), 449–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1994). Empowerment through photo Novella: Portraits of participation. Health Education Quarterly, 21(2), 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Wang, C. C., Yi, W. K., Tao, Z. W., & Carovano, K. (1998). Photovoice as a participatory health promotion strategy. Health Promotion International, 13(1), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Warren, S. (2005). Photography and voice in critical qualitative management research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(6), 861–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Waterhouse, J. (2007). From narratives to portraits: Methodology and methods to portray leadership. The Curriculum Journal, 18(3), 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. West, N. M. (2000). Kodak and the Lens of Nostalgia. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  117. Woodward, S. (2008). Digital photography and research relationships: Capturing the fashion moment. Sociology, 42(5), 857–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Yoshihama, M. (2016). Images of the invisible and visions for the future: Photovoice following the great East Japan Disasters. In Third ISA forum of sociology (July 10–14, 2016), Vienna, Austria, 2016. Isaconf.Google Scholar
  119. Yoshihama, M., & Carr, E. S. (2002). Community participation reconsidered: Feminist participatory action research with Hmong women. Journal of Community Practice, 10(4), 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Zuromskis, C. (2013). Snapshot photography: The lives of images. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sten Langmann
    • 1
  • David Pick
    • 2
  1. 1.Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Curtin Business SchoolPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations