Skip to main content

Uncertainty Quantification for the Gironde Estuary Hydrodynamics with TELEMAC2D

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Water ((SPWA))

Abstract

In a context of development and implementation of data assimilation techniques in Gironde estuary for flood forecasting, a TELEMAC2D model is used to compute water depth and velocity fields at each node of an unstructured mesh. Upstream, the model boundaries are, respectively, La Réole and Pessac on the Garonne and Dordogne rivers. The maritime boundary is 32 km off the mouth of Gironde estuary, located in Le Verdon. This model, which contains 7351 nodes and 12,838 finite elements, does not take into account overflows. This paper presents a global SA study in the context of flood forecasting in the Gironde estuary. It aims at identifying which input variables should be better described for water levels to be better simulated and forecasted in the estuary. On the one hand, a propagation and quantification of uncertainties by a unidirectional analysis method was carried out. On the other hand, a variance sensitivity study (ANOVA) was carried out, by calculating the total and partial sensitivity Sobol’ indices for all numerical parameters (wind influence coefficient, Strickler friction coefficients for four zones) and time-dependent forcings of the model (rivers discharges and maritime boundary conditions). It led to the identification of parameters and forcings to which the model is most sensitive for each area of the estuary, as well as the identification of very low interdependencies, in order to choose the variables to assimilate later. The standardized variation coefficients for 1981 event as well as Sobol’ indices for 2003 event show a predominance of the influence of the maritime boundary conditions all along the estuary and of the Strickler coefficient corresponding to the zone considered for the estuarine part and the confluence, to which must be added the Garonne discharge as a predominant parameter for the latter. Unsurprisingly, the upstream part of river zones is influenced primarily by the friction coefficient and the respective river flows of Garonne and Dordogne rivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   389.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Iooss, B., & Lemaître, P. (2014). A review on global sensitivity analysis methods. Chapter Uncertainty Management in Simulation-Optimization of Complex Systems, Volume 59 of the series Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, pp. 101–122.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Efron, B., & Stein, C. (1981). The Jackknife estimate of variance. Annals Statistics, 9(3), 586–596. doi:https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176345462. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1176345462.

  3. Becker, W., & Saltelli, A. (2015). Design for sensitivity analysis. In Handbook of design and analysis of experiments (pp. 627–673).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sobol’, I. M. (1993). Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear mathematical models. Mathematical Modeling & Computational Experiment, 1, pp. 407–414.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gauckler, P. H. (1867). Etudes Théoriques et Pratiques sur l’Ecoulement et le Mouvement des Eaux (pp. 818–822). Tome 64, Paris, France: Comptes Rendues de l’Académie des Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hervouet, J. M. (2006). Hydrodynamics of free surface flows. Ed. Wiley. 390 p.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hissel, F. (2010). Projet Gironde—Rapport final d’évaluation du modèle Gironde. 70 p.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Levy, F. (2013). Construction d’un modèle de surcotes sur la façade atlantique, rapport provisoire.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Levy, F., & Joly, A. (2013). Modélisation des surcotes avec TELEMAC2D, rapport EDF à accessibilité restreinte. 79 p.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saltelli, A., & Annoni, P. (2010). How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis. Environmental Modelling and Software, 25(12), 1508–1517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nossent, J., Elsen, P., & Bauwens, W. (2011). Sobol’ sensitivity analysis of a complex environmental model. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(12), 1515–1525.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jansen, M. J. W. (1999). Analysis of variance designs for model output. Computer Physics Communications, 117, 35–43.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Saltelli, A. (2002). Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices. Computer Physics Communications, 145, 280–297.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the service in charge of flood forecast on Garonne, Adour and Dordogne watersheds (SPC GAD), METEO-FRANCE and Greater Maritime Port Councils of Bordeaux (GPMB) for bathymetric and observation data they provided for the needs of this study. The sea level observations along Gironde estuary are the property of GPMB and of the French Ministry in charge of sustainable development (MEEM).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanessya Laborie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Laborie, V., Goutal, N., Ricci, S., De Lozzo, M., Sergent, P. (2018). Uncertainty Quantification for the Gironde Estuary Hydrodynamics with TELEMAC2D. In: Gourbesville, P., Cunge, J., Caignaert, G. (eds) Advances in Hydroinformatics . Springer Water. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7218-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics