Abstract
In a context of development and implementation of data assimilation techniques in Gironde estuary for flood forecasting, a TELEMAC2D model is used to compute water depth and velocity fields at each node of an unstructured mesh. Upstream, the model boundaries are, respectively, La Réole and Pessac on the Garonne and Dordogne rivers. The maritime boundary is 32 km off the mouth of Gironde estuary, located in Le Verdon. This model, which contains 7351 nodes and 12,838 finite elements, does not take into account overflows. This paper presents a global SA study in the context of flood forecasting in the Gironde estuary. It aims at identifying which input variables should be better described for water levels to be better simulated and forecasted in the estuary. On the one hand, a propagation and quantification of uncertainties by a unidirectional analysis method was carried out. On the other hand, a variance sensitivity study (ANOVA) was carried out, by calculating the total and partial sensitivity Sobol’ indices for all numerical parameters (wind influence coefficient, Strickler friction coefficients for four zones) and time-dependent forcings of the model (rivers discharges and maritime boundary conditions). It led to the identification of parameters and forcings to which the model is most sensitive for each area of the estuary, as well as the identification of very low interdependencies, in order to choose the variables to assimilate later. The standardized variation coefficients for 1981 event as well as Sobol’ indices for 2003 event show a predominance of the influence of the maritime boundary conditions all along the estuary and of the Strickler coefficient corresponding to the zone considered for the estuarine part and the confluence, to which must be added the Garonne discharge as a predominant parameter for the latter. Unsurprisingly, the upstream part of river zones is influenced primarily by the friction coefficient and the respective river flows of Garonne and Dordogne rivers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Iooss, B., & Lemaître, P. (2014). A review on global sensitivity analysis methods. Chapter Uncertainty Management in Simulation-Optimization of Complex Systems, Volume 59 of the series Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, pp. 101–122.
Efron, B., & Stein, C. (1981). The Jackknife estimate of variance. Annals Statistics, 9(3), 586–596. doi:https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176345462. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1176345462.
Becker, W., & Saltelli, A. (2015). Design for sensitivity analysis. In Handbook of design and analysis of experiments (pp. 627–673).
Sobol’, I. M. (1993). Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear mathematical models. Mathematical Modeling & Computational Experiment, 1, pp. 407–414.
Gauckler, P. H. (1867). Etudes Théoriques et Pratiques sur l’Ecoulement et le Mouvement des Eaux (pp. 818–822). Tome 64, Paris, France: Comptes Rendues de l’Académie des Sciences.
Hervouet, J. M. (2006). Hydrodynamics of free surface flows. Ed. Wiley. 390 p.
Hissel, F. (2010). Projet Gironde—Rapport final d’évaluation du modèle Gironde. 70 p.
Levy, F. (2013). Construction d’un modèle de surcotes sur la façade atlantique, rapport provisoire.
Levy, F., & Joly, A. (2013). Modélisation des surcotes avec TELEMAC2D, rapport EDF à accessibilité restreinte. 79 p.
Saltelli, A., & Annoni, P. (2010). How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis. Environmental Modelling and Software, 25(12), 1508–1517.
Nossent, J., Elsen, P., & Bauwens, W. (2011). Sobol’ sensitivity analysis of a complex environmental model. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(12), 1515–1525.
Jansen, M. J. W. (1999). Analysis of variance designs for model output. Computer Physics Communications, 117, 35–43.
Saltelli, A. (2002). Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices. Computer Physics Communications, 145, 280–297.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the service in charge of flood forecast on Garonne, Adour and Dordogne watersheds (SPC GAD), METEO-FRANCE and Greater Maritime Port Councils of Bordeaux (GPMB) for bathymetric and observation data they provided for the needs of this study. The sea level observations along Gironde estuary are the property of GPMB and of the French Ministry in charge of sustainable development (MEEM).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Laborie, V., Goutal, N., Ricci, S., De Lozzo, M., Sergent, P. (2018). Uncertainty Quantification for the Gironde Estuary Hydrodynamics with TELEMAC2D. In: Gourbesville, P., Cunge, J., Caignaert, G. (eds) Advances in Hydroinformatics . Springer Water. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7218-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7218-5_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7217-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7218-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)