Skip to main content

Information Cascade, Kirman’s Ant Colony Model, and Kinetic Ising Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applications of Data-Centric Science to Social Design

Part of the book series: Agent-Based Social Systems ((ABSS,volume 14))

  • 392 Accesses

Abstract

We discuss a voting model in which voters can obtain information from a finite number of previous voters. It is the equilibrium process. There exist three groups of voters: (i) digital herders and independent voters, (ii) analog herders and independent voters, and (iii) \(\tanh \)-type herders. In the case (i), we show that the solution oscillates between the two states. A good (bad) equilibrium is where a majority of r select the correct (wrong) candidate. We show that there is no phase transition when r is finite. If the annealing schedule is adequately slow from finite r to infinite r, the voting rate converges only to the good equilibrium. In case (ii), the state of reference votes is equivalent to that of Kirman’s ant colony model, and it follows beta-binomial distribution. In case (iii), we show that the model is equivalent to the finite-size kinetic Ising model. If the voters are rational, a simple herding experiment of information cascade is conducted. Information cascade results from the quenching of the kinetic Ising model. As case (i) is the limit of case (iii) when \(\tanh \) function becomes a step function, the phase transition can be observed in infinite-size limit. We can confirm that there is no phase transition when the reference number r is finite. This chapter is based on Hisakado and Mori (Physica A 417:63–75, 2015).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alfarano S, Lux T, Wagner F (2005) Estimation of agent-based models: the case of asymmetric herding model. Comput Econ 26(1):19–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson LR, Holt CA (1997) Information cascdes in the laboratory. Am Econ Rev 87(5):847–862

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekers R, Deneubourg JL, Gross S (1992) Modulation of trial laying in the ant Lasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and its role in the collective selection of a food source. J Insect Behav 6:751–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of Ffads, fashion, custom, and cultural changes as information cascades. J Polit Econ 100:992–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm W (2000) The correlated random walk with boundaries: a combinatorial solution. J Appl Prob 37:470–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camazine S, Sbeyd J (1991) A model of collective nectar source selection by honey bees: Self-organization through simple rules. J Theor Biol 149:547–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellano C, Fortunato S, Loreto V (2009) Statistical physics of social dynamics. Rev Mod Phys 81:591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cont R, Bouchaud J (2000) Herd behavior and aggregate fluctuations in financial markets. Macroecon Dyn 4:170–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couzin ID, Krause J, James R, Ruxton GR, Franks NR (2002) Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. J Theor Biol 218:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curty P, Marsili M (2006) Phase coexistence in a forecasting game. JSTAT P03013

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguíluz V, Zimmermann M (2000) Transmission of information and herd behavior: an application to financial markets. Phys Rev Lett 85:5659–5662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galam S (2008) A review of Galam models. Int J Mod Phys C 19:409–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geman S, Geman D (1984) Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs, distribution, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans PAMI 6:721–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisakado M, Mori S (2010) Phase transition and information cascade in a voting model. J Phys A 43:315207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisakado M, Mori S (2011) Digital herders and phase transition in a voting model. J Phys A 44:275204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisakado M, Mori S (2012) Two kinds of phase transitions in a voting model. J Phys A 45:345002–345016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisakado M, Mori S (2015) Information cascade, Kirman’s ant colony model and Ising model. Physica A 417:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisakado M, Kitsukawa K, Mori S (2006) Correlated binomial models and correlation structures. J Phys A 39:1 5365–15378

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadanoff L (1966) Scling laws for Ising model near T c. Physics 2:263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirman A (1993) Ants, rationality, and recruitment. Q J Econ 108:137–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konno N (2002) Limit theorems and absorption problems for quantum random walks in one dimension. Quantum Inf Comput 2:578–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Meunier H, Leca JB, Deneubourg JL, Petit O (2007) Group movement decisions in capuchin monkeys: the utility of an experimental study and a mathematical model to explore the relationship between individual and collective behaviours. Behavior 143:1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram S, Bickman L, Berkowitz L (1969) Note on the drawing power of clowds of different size. J Pers Soc Psychol 13:79–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori S, Hisakado M, Takahashi T (2012) Phase transition to two-peaks phase in an information cascade experiment. Phys Rev E 86:26109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge BL (1982) The structure and function of fish schools. Sci Am 245:90–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt SC, Mallon E, Sumpter DJL, Franks RN (2002) Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer D (2002) Sociophysics: the Sznajd model and its applications. Comput Phys Commun 146(1):93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarde G (1890) Les lois de l’imitation. Felix Alcan. Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward AJ, Sumpter DJ, Cauzin ID, Hart PJ, Krause J (2008) Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals. Proc Natl Acad Sci 205(19):6948–6953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts DJ, Dodds PS (2007) Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. J Consum Res 34:441–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young (2011) The dynamics of social innovation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(4):21285–21291

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix A Ising Model

Here we introduce the infinite-range model. It is one of the most popular model in statistical physics which explains the phase transition. In the model spins interact all other spins. Hamiltonian is

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} H(\sigma)=-\frac{J}{N}\sum_{i>j} \sigma_i \sigma_j -h\sum_{i=1}^N \sigma_i, \end{aligned} $$
(29)

where N is the number of spins, σ is the spin that has the value ± 1, J is the parameter of interaction, and h is the outer field. Here we define average of spins, as order parameter, \(m=1/N\sum \sigma _i\).

In large N → limit, the self-consistent equation is

$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} m=\tanh \beta(Jm+h), \end{aligned} $$
(30)

where β = 1∕k B T. k B is Boltzmann constant and T is temperature. When infinite-range model, we can obtain the strict solution from the self-consistent equation. When the symmetric case, under the transition temperature T C, there are two solutions. One of the solution is selected, and it is called spontaneous symmetry braking. On the other hand, above T c, there is only one solution. It is the simple model which represents the phase transition. When there is the outer field h, the model becomes the asymmetric model, and there is no phase transition.

In this chapter we discussed the equilibrium voting model. The model which we discussed in Hisakado and Mori (2012) is the non-equilibrium model. The large r limit corresponds to the large N limit of the infinite-range model. We can observe the phase transition in both models.

In the case of non-equilibrium, we can obtain the same self-consistent equation. In this case the solution which is against the outer field may be selected. It is the characteristic point of the non-equilibrium model which we discuss in other chapters.

Appendix B Response Function of Animals

In this chapter we use three kinds of herders, digital, analog, and tanh type. In Sect. 3, we studied the Kirman’s ant colony model. In this model the response function is analog. Here we have the question whether the real ant is analog herder. In this appendix we review the several experiments of animals about decision of the two choices. In Table 1 we show the list of the response function of the animals. These are the decision of two selections of animals. For the nonlinear response function, there is the spontaneous symmetry braking which corresponds to the phase transition. On the other hand, for linear response function, there is no phase transition. From the experiments some ants are analog herders, and some are tanh-type herders. About humans we presented in Chaps. 8 and 9. In the case of animals, the nonlinear response function is sometimes called quorum response.

Table 1 Response functions of animalsl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hisakado, M., Mori, S. (2019). Information Cascade, Kirman’s Ant Colony Model, and Kinetic Ising Model. In: Sato, AH. (eds) Applications of Data-Centric Science to Social Design. Agent-Based Social Systems, vol 14. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7194-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics