Advertisement

Analysis of Survival Data Under an Assumed Copula

  • Takeshi Emura
  • Yi-Hau Chen
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Statistics book series (BRIEFSSTATIST)

Abstract

This chapter introduces statistical methods for analyzing survival data subject to dependent censoring. We review the copula-graphic estimator, parametric likelihood methods, and semi-parametric likelihood methods developed under a variety of copula models. All these approaches employ an assumed copula, a copula function that is completely specified including its parameter value to avoid the non-identifiability.

Keywords

Burr distribution Competing risk Copula-graphic estimator Maximum likelihood estimator Spline Weibull distribution 

References

  1. Amini M, Jabbari H, Mohtashami Borzadaran GR (2011) Aspects of dependence in generalized Farlie-Gumbel-Morgenstern distributions. Commun Stat Simul Comput 40(8):1192–1205MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Braekers R, Veraverbeke N (2005) A copula-graphic estimator for the conditional survival function under dependent censoring. Can J Stat 33:429–447MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Chaieb LL, Rivest LP, Abdous B (2006) Estimating survival under a dependent truncation. Biometrika 93(3):655–669MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen YH (2010) Semiparametric marginal regression analysis for dependent competing risks under an assumed copula. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 72:235–251MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Collett D (2015) Modelling survival data in medical research, 3rd edn. CRC Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Commenges D, Jacqmin-Gadda H (2015) Dynamical biostatistical models. CRC Press, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 34:187–220zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. de Uña-Álvarez J, Veraverbeke N (2013) Generalized copula-graphic estimator. TEST 22(2):343–360MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. de Uña-Álvarez J, Veraverbeke N (2017) Copula-graphic estimation with left-truncated and right-censored data. Statistics 51(2):387–403MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Domma F, Giordano S (2013) A copula-based approach to account for dependence in stress-strength models. Stat Pap 54(3):807–826MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Emura T, Chen YH (2016) Gene selection for survival data under dependent censoring, a copula-based approach. Stat Methods Med Res 25(6):2840–2857MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Emura T, Murotani K (2015) An algorithm for estimating survival under a copula-based dependent truncation model. TEST 24(4):734–751MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Emura T, Michimae H (2017) A copula-based inference to piecewise exponential models under dependent censoring, with application to time to metamorphosis of salamander larvae. Environ Ecol Stat 24(1):151–173MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emura T, Nakatochi M, Murotani K, Rondeau V (2017) A joint frailty-copula model between tumour progression and death for meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 26(6):2649–2666MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Emura T (2018) joint.Cox: penalized likelihood estimation and dynamic prediction under the joint frailty-copula models between tumour progression and death for meta-analysis, CRANGoogle Scholar
  16. Emura T, Chen HY, Matsui S, Chen YH (2018) compound.Cox: univariate feature selection and compound covariate for predicting survival, CRANGoogle Scholar
  17. Escarela G, Carrière JF (2003) Fitting competing risks with an assumed copula. Stat Methods Med Res 12(4):333–349MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Heckman JJ, Honore BE (1989) The identifiability of the competing risks models. Biometrika 76:325–330MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Hu YH, Emura T (2015) Maximum likelihood estimation for a special exponential family under random double-truncation. Comput Stat 30(4):1199–1229MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Moradian H, Denis Larocque D, Bellavance F (2017). Survival forests for data with dependent censoring. Stat Methods Med Res,  https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280217727314
  21. Nelsen RB (2006) An introduction to copulas, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. O’ Sullivan F (1988) Fast computation of fully automated log-density and log-hazard estimation. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 9:363–379Google Scholar
  23. Ramsay J (1988) Monotone regression spline in action. Stat Sci 3:425–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rivest LP, Wells MT (2001) A martingale approach to the copula-graphic estimator for the survival function under dependent censoring. J Multivar Anal 79:138–155MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Shih JH, Emura T (2016) Bivariate dependence measures and bivariate competing risks models under the generalized FGM copula. Stat Pap,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-016-0865-5
  26. Shih JH, Lee W, Sun LH, Emura T (2018) Fitting competing risks data to bivariate Pareto models. Commun Stat Theory,  https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2018.1425450
  27. Shih JH, Emura T (2018) Likelihood-based inference for bivariate latent failure time models with competing risks under the generalized FGM copula. Comput Stat,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-018-0804-0
  28. Shih JH (2018) GFGM.copula: generalized Farlie-Gumbel-Morgenstern copula, CRANGoogle Scholar
  29. Shih JH and Lee W (2018) Bivariate.Pareto: bivariate Pareto models, CRANGoogle Scholar
  30. Staplin ND (2012) Informative censoring in transplantation statistics. Doctoral Thesis, University of Southampton, School of MathematicsGoogle Scholar
  31. Staplin ND, Kimber AC, Collett D, Roderick PJ (2015) Dependent censoring in piecewise exponential survival models. Stat Methods Med Res 24(3):325–341MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tsiatis A (1975) A nonidentifiability aspect of the problem of competing risks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 72(1):20–22MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Zheng M, Klein JP (1995) Estimates of marginal survival for dependent competing risks based on an assumed copula. Biometrika 82(1):127–138MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takeshi Emura
    • 1
  • Yi-Hau Chen
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate Institute of StatisticsNational Central UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan
  2. 2.Institute of Statistical ScienceAcademia SinicaTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations