Abstract
This chapter addresses the complexity of university learning spaces by recasting them as communicative texts, that is, meaning-making environments that say something to and with students and teachers in their design and their social and cultural location . This enables a focus on the process of meaning-making between students and aspects of spatial design , in order to reveal communicative patterns which create social relations, facilitate activities, and which bring all the different elements together into a coherent whole. The approach developed here is a social-semiotic, multi-modal one, laying the foundations for a social semiotic topography of university learning space designs, which incorporates the use of physical, virtual and social learning affordances . It outlines the underlying parameters of such a topography and illustrates them in relation to one particular type of learning space, an ‘active learning space’. Ultimately, the aim is for such a topography to account for complex definitions of meaning across multiple configurations of learning situations, and to do so in a way which provides particular insights on learning spaces as communicative texts, insights which complement those which can be provided by other perspectives and which can be used to provide feedback into practice, in terms of both design and use of these spaces.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
In social-semiotic approaches to communication, especially systemic -functional linguistics, functional roles are marked with an initial capital.
- 2.
In Ravelli and McMurtrie 2016a, social distance is discussed in terms of the interactants' relation to the physical space itself, that is, what they can and cannot physically access. In this chapter, however, the focus is on how the design of the space enables relations between users.
- 3.
These variables always interact with each other, but are nevertheless independent.
- 4.
‘CATS’ stands for ‘Centrally Allocated Teaching Spaces’.
References
Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (Eds.). (2014). The architecture of productive learning networks. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
Cavalho, L., Goodyear, P., & de Laat, M. (Eds.). (2016). Place-based spaces for networked learning. New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
Chan, E., & Unsworth, L. (2011). Image-language interaction in online reading environments: Challenges for students’ reading comprehension. Australian Educational Researcher, 38(2), 181–202.
Dillenbourg, P. (2013). Design for classroom orchestration. Computers & Education, 69, 485–492.
Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. New York: Continuum.
Ellis, R. A., & Goodyear, P. (2010). Student Experiences of e-learning in higher education: The ecology of sustainable innovation. London, UK: Routledge.
Halliday, M. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London, UK: Arnold.
Halliday, M. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London, UK: Arnold.
Halliday, M., & Hasan, H. (1985). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Waurn Ponds, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). An introduction to functional grammar. London, UK: Arnold.
Hood, S., & Maggiore, P. (in press). A Lecturer at work: Language, the body and space in the structuring of disciplinary knowledge in Law. In J. H. de Silva (Ed.), Language at work in social contexts: Analysing language use in work, educational, medical and museum contexts. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. London, UK: Routledge.
Jones, P. (2008). The interplay of discourse, place and space in pedagogic relations. In L. Unsworth (Ed.), Multimodal semiotics: Functional analysis in contexts of education (pp. 67–85). London: Continuum.
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Bourne, J., Franks, A., Hardcastle, J., Jones, K., et al. (2005). English in urban classrooms: A multimodal perspective on teaching and learning. London, UK: Routledge.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London, UK: Arnold.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The grammar of visual design. London, UK: Routledge.
Lacey, N. (1998). Image and representation. New York, NY, USA: St. Martin’s Press.
Lim, F., O’Halloran, K., & Podlasov, A. (2012). Spatial pedagogy: Mapping meanings in the use of classroom space. Cambridge journal of education, 42(2), 235–251.
McMurtrie, R. (2013). Spatiogrammatics: A social semiotic perspective on moving bodies transforming the meaning potential of space. Ph.D. Thesis, School of the Arts and Media, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of New South Wales.
Mills, K. (2016). Literacy theories for the digital age: Social, critical, multimodal, spatial, material and sensory lenses. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
O’Toole, M. (2011). The language of displayed art. London, UK: Leicester University Press.
Ravelli, L., & McMurtrie, R. (2016a). Multimodality in the built environment: Spatial discourse analysis. London, NY: Routledge.
Ravelli, L., & McMurtrie, R. (2016b). A social-semiotic analysis of a redesigned university library. In L. Cavalho, P. Goodyear, & de Laat, M. (Eds.), Place-based spaces for networked learning (pp. 111–130). New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
Stenglin, M. (2004). Packaging curiosities: Towards a grammar of three-dimensional space, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney.
Unsworth, L., & Thomas, A. (Eds.). (2014). English teaching and new literacies pedagogy: Interpreting and authoring digital multimedia narratives. New York, NY, USA: Peter Lang.
UNSW Learning Environments (2016). PALS Evaluation validates new standards for active learning spaces. https://www.learningenvironments.unsw.edu.au/news/pals-evaluation-validates-new-standards-active-learning-spaces. Accessed February 1, 2017.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London, UK, USA: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ravelli, L.J. (2018). Towards a Social-Semiotic Topography of University Learning Spaces: Tools to Connect Use, Users and Meanings. In: Ellis, R., Goodyear, P. (eds) Spaces of Teaching and Learning. Understanding Teaching-Learning Practice. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7155-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7155-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7154-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7155-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)