Skip to main content

From Cradle to Classroom: Exploring Opportunities to Support the Development of Shape and Space Concepts in Very Young Children

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Forging Connections in Early Mathematics Teaching and Learning

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the growing body of evidence regarding the nascent geometrical capabilities of young children. We focus on spatial awareness and shape which are two broad concepts that underpin geometrical thinking from 0 to 8 years. In relation to each concept, we identify key indicators of informal learning trajectories, the mathematical underpinnings of these concepts and how they manifest themselves in early infancy through the preschool years and into the early primary school years. In parallel with these informal trajectories, we explain ‘big ideas’ which may include obstacles to learning or key misconceptions. Finally, we outline ways of supporting the development of geometrical understandings across the early years making reference to informal mathematics and play-based activities within the home and community setting and acknowledge the important role that language, gesture and context play in the development of children’s geometrical capacities and understandings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Athey, C. (2007). Extending thought in young children. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 843–908). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, C., & Hawes, Z. (2015). The role of 2D and 3D mental rotations in mathematics for young children: What is it? Why does it matter? And what can we do about it? ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(3), 331–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussi, M. G., & Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2015). Geometry in early years: Sowing seeds for a mathematical definition of squares and rectangles. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, S. (1996). Learning with large blocks. In E. S. Hirsch (Ed.), The block book (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for Education of Young Children (NAEYC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, B. M., Andrews, N., Schindler, H., Kersh, J. E., Samper, A., & Copley, J. (2008). The development of spatial skills through interventions involving block building activities. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 269–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, R. (1980). Exemplification and characterization moves in the classroom teaching of geometry concepts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11(1), 10–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2004). Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking, students and learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching learning (pp. 489–517). Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2006). The role of gesture in learning: Do students use their hands to change their minds? Journal of Cognition and Development, 7(2), 211–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copley, J. (2010). The young child and mathematics (2nd ed.) Washington: National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLoache, J. S., Miller, K. F., & Rosengren, K. S. (1997). The credible shrinking room: Very young children’s performance with symbolic and non-symbolic relations. Psychological Science, 8, 308–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLoache, J. S., Pierroutsakos, S. L., Uttal, D. H., Rosengren, K. S., & Gottlieb, A. (1998). Grasping the nature of pictures. Psychological Science, 9, 205–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [DEEWR]. (2009). Belonging, being & becoming—The early years learning framework for Australia. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diezmann, C., & Yelland, N. J. (2000). Developing mathematical literacy in the early childhood years. In N. J. Yelland (Ed.), Promoting meaningful learning (pp. 47–58). Washington: NAEYC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elia, I., Gagatsis, A., Michael, P., Georgiou, A. S., & van den Heuvel, M. (2014). The role of gestures in making connections between space and shape aspects and their verbal representations in the early years: Findings from a case study. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26, 735–761. doi:10.1007/s13394-013-0104-5.

  • Flavell, J. H., Abrahams Everett, B., Croft, K., & Flavell, E. R. (1981). Young children’s knowledge about visual perception: Further evidence for the level 1–level 2 distinction. Developmental Psychology, 17(1), 99–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, T. B. (2000). Implications of research on children’s understanding of geometry. Teaching Children Mathematics, 6, 572–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. (2003). Why we’re so smart. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Madow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 195–235). Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, E. P., Clements, D., Zbiek, R. M., & Dougherty, B. (2014). Developing essential understanding of geometry and measurement for teaching mathematics in pre-K–grade 2. Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmeid, E., & Jackson, S. (1994). People under three: Young children in daycare (1st ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Beilock, S. L., & Levine, S. C. (2012). The relation between spatial skill and early number knowledge: The role of the linear number line. Developmental Psychology, 48(5), 1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallowell, D. A., Okamoto, Y., Romo, L. F., & La Joy, J. R. (2015). First-graders’ spatial-mathematical reasoning about plane and solid shapes and their representations. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 363–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershkowitz, R. (1989). Visualization in geometry: Two sides of the coin. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11(1), 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, K. (2001) Blocks as a tool for learning: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives in Young Children 56 (1): 6–11. Washington: National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hock, T. T., Rohani A. T., Aida S. M., Yunus, & Ahmad, F. (2015). Understanding the primary school students’ van Hiele levels of geometry thinking in learning shapes and spaces: A Q-methodology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(4), 793–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hourigan, M., & Leavy, A. (2015). What’s a real shape? Designing appropriate geometric instruction. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 20(1), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hourigan, M., & Leavy, A. M. (2016). Practical problems: Introducing statistics to Kindergarteners. Teaching Children Mathematics, 22(5), 283–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, H. (2015). Two aspects of young children’s thinking about different types f dynamic triangles: Prototypicality and inclusion. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47, 407–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knaus, M., & Featherstone, S. (2014). Maths is all around you. London: Featherstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, A., & Hourigan, M. (2015). Budding architects: Exploring the designs of pyramids and prisms. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 20(3), 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, A., & Nicholson, A. J. (2011). Baby walkers in Europe-time to consider a ban. Irish Medical Journal, 104(3), 69.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA). (2009). Aistear: The early childhood curriculum framework. Principles and themes. Dublin, Ireland: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA). (2014). Mathematics in early childhood and primary education. Dublin, Ireland: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths towards excellence and equity. In C. Cross, T. Woods, & H. Schweingruber (Eds.), Committee on Early Childhood Mathematics, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutbrown, C. (2011). Threads of thinking. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Örnkloo, H., & von Hofsten, C. (2007). Fitting objects into holes: On the development of spatial cognition skills. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 404–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillow, B., & Flavell, J. (1986). Young children’s knowledge about visual perception: Projective size and shape. Child Development, 57, 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping, R., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Hands in the air: Using ungrounded iconic gestures to teach children conservation of quantity. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1277–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pound, L. (2006). Supporting mathematical development in the early years. Oxford: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruden, S. M., Levine, S. C., & Huttenlocher, J. (2011). Children’s spatial thinking: Does talk about the spatial world matter? Developmental Science, 14(6), 1417–1430. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01088.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pytlak, M. (2015). Learning geometry through paper-based experiences. Conference proceedings of Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education (CERME9). Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, M.P., & Serrazina, L. (2015). Six years old pupils intuitive knowledge about triangles. Conference proceedings of Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education (CERME9). Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. M., & Lee, Y. J. (2004). Interpreting unfamiliar graphs: A generative, activity-theoretic model. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57, 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research. Learning trajectories for young children. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, N., & Moss, J. (2012). The more it changes, the more it becomes the same: The development of the routine of shape identification in dynamic geometry environments. International Journal of Education Research, 51&52, 28–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2004). Quality teaching in the early years. In A. Anning, J. Cullen, & M. Fleer (Eds.), Early childhood education: Society and culture (pp. 137–148). London, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R. (1969). The psychology of learning mathematics. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stannard, L., Wolfgang, C. H., Jones, I., & Phelps, P. (2001). A longitudinal study of the predictive relations among construction play and mathematical achievement. Early Child Development and Care, 167(1), 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom, J.S., & McGarvey, L. (2015). The act and artifact of drawing(s): Observing geometric thinking with, in, and through children’s drawings. ZDM Mathematics Education (Special issue: Geometry in primary school), 47(3), 465–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tovey, H. (2013). Bringing the Froebel approach to your early years practice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, K. (2005). Mathematics through play in the early years. London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, K. (2010). Mathematics through play in the early years (2nd ed.). London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzeno, L., Alibali, M. A., & Klatzky, R. (2003). Teachers’ gestures facilitate students’ learning: A lesson in symmetry. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Elia, I., & Robitzsch, A. (2015). Kindergartners’ performance in two types of imaginary perspective-taking. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(3), 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. (1986). Feature frequency and the use of negative instances in a geometric task. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(2), 130–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation. (2006). WHO motor development study: Windows of achievement for six gross motor development milestones. Acta Paediatr Suppl. Apr; 450: 86–95.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aisling Leavy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Leavy, A., Pope, J., Breatnach, D. (2018). From Cradle to Classroom: Exploring Opportunities to Support the Development of Shape and Space Concepts in Very Young Children. In: Kinnear, V., Lai, M., Muir, T. (eds) Forging Connections in Early Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Early Mathematics Learning and Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7153-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7153-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7151-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7153-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics