• Mi-yeon Hur


I wrote this book to fill a major lacuna in the existing literature by providing a comprehensive analysis of the Six-Party Talks process. Closer scrutiny of the Six-Party Talks as a “process” would provide greater analytical purchase, as a single incident never happens independently without being caused or at least constituted by previous interactions, nor ends without generating effects. Locating the SPT process in the broader context of foreign policy changes, I examine when and how the states set out to “shift” their foreign policy during the SPT, which potentially reshaped foreign policy behavior of other principal states and affected the rise and fall of the six-party framework.


  1. Archer, Margaret S. (2010) Morphogenesis Versus Structuration: On Combining Structure and Action. The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 61 (Suppl. 1), pp. 225–252.Google Scholar
  2. Bahng, Tae-seop (July, 2011) The Sino-US Tug of War Over North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons. SERI Quarterly, No. 3, pp. 121–126.Google Scholar
  3. Bajoria, Jayshree and Beina Xu (2013) The China-North Korea Relationship. Council on Foreign Relations. Available at:
  4. Beneš, Vít (2011) Role Theory: A Conceptual Framework for the Constructivist Foreign Policy Analysis? Third Global International Studies Conference, Porto, Portugal, 17–20 August 2011.Google Scholar
  5. Blumer, Herber (2004) George Herbert Mead and Human Conduct. CA: AltaMira PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Ceuster, Koen De and Jan Melissen (2008) Ending the North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Six Parties, Six Perspectives. Clingendael Diplomacy Papers, No. 18.Google Scholar
  7. Evans, Paul (2007) Constructing Multilateralism in an Anti-Region: From Six Party Talks to a Regional Security Framework in Northeast Asia? In: Shin, Gi-Wook and Daniel Snyder (eds.) Cross Currents: Regionalism and Nationalism in Northeast Asia. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hagström, Linus and Marie Söderberg (2006) North Korea policy: Japan and the great powers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Harnisch, Sebastian (2012) Conceptualizing in the Minefield: Role Theory and Foreign Policy Learning. Foreign Policy Analysis, No. 8, pp. 47–69.Google Scholar
  10. Harnisch, Sabastian (2011) Role Theory: Operationalization of Key Concepts. In: Harnisch, Sebastian, Cornelia Frank, and Hanns W. Maull (eds.) Role Theory in International Relations: Approaches and Analyses. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Hayes, Peter & others (2005) Light Water Reactors at the Six Party Talks: The Barrier that Makes the Water Flow. NAPSNet Policy Forum (21 September 2005). Available at:
  12. Hermann, Charles F. (2012) Continuity and Change in Foreign Policy Decision Making. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Holsti, K. J. (1970) National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 233–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horowitz, Shale and Min Ye (2006) China’s Grand Strategy and the Six Party Talks. American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, September 2006.Google Scholar
  15. Hughes, Christopher W. (2006) Introduction: A Multilateral Future for North-East Asian Security? In: Hagström, Linus and Marie Söderberg (eds.) North Korea Policy: Japan and the Great Powers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Kim, Jin-ha (2011) On the Threshold of Power, 2011/12: Pyongyang’s Politics of Transition. International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 1–26Google Scholar
  17. Krotz, Ulrich (2002) National Role Conceptions and Foreign Policies: France and Germany Compared. Program for the Study of Germany and Europe, Working Paper 02.1. Available at:
  18. Martin, Matthew (2009) The Six-Party Talks and New Opportunities to Strengthen Regional Nonproliferation and Disarmament Efforts. Conference Sponsored by the Stanley Foundation, the National Committee on North Korea, the Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis, and the Chinese Arms Control and Disarmament Association, Beijing, 23–24 October 2008.Google Scholar
  19. Perry, Charles M. and James L. Schoff (2004) Building Six-Party Capacity for a WMD-Free Korea. The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, Vol. 16, No. 2.Google Scholar
  20. Reiss, Mitchell B. (2008) North Korea: Getting to Maybe? In: Cronin, Patrick M. (ed.) Double Trouble: Iran and North Korea as Challenges to International Security. Westport, Connecticut and London: Praeger Security International.Google Scholar
  21. Rozman, Gilbert (2011) Security Challenges to the United States in Northeast Asia: Looking beyond the Transformation of the Six-Party Talks. In: East Asian Security: Two Views. Strategic Studies Institute.Google Scholar
  22. Shin, Sook-ok and Kab-woo Koo (2008) Embedded Conflicting Identities in the Six-Party Talks: The Complexity of Regional Security in Northeast Asia. International Studies Association Convention, San Francisco, 26–29 March 2008.Google Scholar
  23. Toloraya, Georgy (2008) The Six Party Talks: A Russian Perspective. Asian Perspective, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 45–69.Google Scholar
  24. Turner, Jonathan H. (2012) Contemporary Sociology Theory. USA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Turner, Jonathan H. (2006) Handbook of Sociological Theory. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Turner, Jonathan H. (1988) A Theory of Social Interaction. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Turner, Ralph H. (1962) Role-Taking: Process vs. Conformity. In: Rose Arnold M. (ed.) Human Behavior and Social Processes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, pp. 20–40.Google Scholar
  28. Van Ness, Peter (2008) Designing a Mechanism for Multilateral Security Cooperation in Northeast Asia. Asian Perspective, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 107–126.Google Scholar
  29. Walker, Stephen (1987) Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Wu, Chunsi (2007) The Six-Party Talks: A Good Platform for Broader Security Cooperation in Northeast Asia. Korean Journal of Security Affairs, 12(2), 109–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mi-yeon Hur
    • 1
  1. 1.Korea UniversitySejong CityKorea (Republic of)

Personalised recommendations