Rethinking Crisis Communication at a Time of Climate Change: Lessons from the Philippines

Part of the Communication, Culture and Change in Asia book series (CCCA, volume 6)


The Philippines is visited by an average of 20 typhoons a year. Hence, whenever one such disaster occurs, crisis communication should be more or less a standard procedure. The weather bureau, Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA), initiates information dissemination to the weather bureau which contacts their local stations who then coordinate with the local media, local government units, and other local entities. So, when typhoon Haiyan entered the Philippines area of responsibility in November 2013, the weather bureau provided all the necessary warnings and connected with the necessary agencies. However, the typhoon caught the country by surprise. Around 13 million people across the Visayas region were affected. More than 6300 persons perished in the typhoon, while 1031 were declared missing. Damage to property was estimated at USD 2.86 billion. The chapter, in light of this disaster, aims to rethink crisis communication at a time of climate change. It is expected that greater numbers of super typhoons will hit the country and that the usual information dissemination flow process is no longer enough to lessen their impacts. The chapter argues that crisis communication needs to be rethought in the context of climate change, and lessons can be learnt from the experience of the Philippines. In particular, crisis communication should focus more on: creating messages attuned toward the social construction of disasters; promoting dialogues rather than simply disseminating information; incorporating new media as part of the media mix; utilizing a community-based information flow parallel to the traditional top-to-bottom approach.


Climate change Haiyan super typhoon Weather information Crisis communication in Philippines 


  1. Australian Broadcasting Corporation International Development (ABCID). (2014). Disaster information providers in the Philippines. Australian Aid.Google Scholar
  2. Bankoff, G. (2004). In the eye of the storm: The social construction of the forces of nature and the climatic and seismic construction of God in the Philippines. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 35(1) (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  3. Carter, W. N. (2008). Disaster management: A disaster manager’s handbook. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  4. Climate Reality Project. (2016). How climate change is affecting the Philippines. Washington. Accessed from
  5. Cool, C. T., et al. (2015). Social media as a risk communication tool following Typhoon Haiyan. Western Pacific Surveillance and Response Journal, 6(Suppl 1), 86–90. doi: 10.5365/wpsar.2015.6.2.HYN_013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Custodio, M. S. J. A., et al. (2014). Utilization of social networking sites of Government agencies for disaster preparedness and management (Vol. 4, No. 1). Working Paper Series on ICT for Development. Dhaka: Bangladesh Institute of ICT for Development and University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  7. Erharuyi, N., & Fairbairn, D. (2003). Mobile geographic information handling technologies to support disaster management. Georgraphy, 88(4) (Geographical Association).Google Scholar
  8. Esteban, M., et al. (2015). Typhoon Haiyan 2013 evacuation preparations and awareness. International Journal of Sustainable Future for Human Security, 3(1).Google Scholar
  9. Garnett, J. L., & Kouzmin, A. (2007). Communicating throughout Katrina: Competing and complementary conceptual lenses on crisis communication. Public Administration Review, 67. Special issue on Administrative Failure in the Wake of Hurricane Katrina. Wiley and American Society for Public Administration.Google Scholar
  10. Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. (2015). United Nations office for disaster risk reduction. Accessed from
  11. Kure, S., et al. (2016). Overview of Super Typhoon Haiyan and characteristics of human damage due to its storm surge in the coastal region, Philippines. Journal of Coastal Research, 75 (Special Issue) (Coastal Education and Research Foundation).Google Scholar
  12. Ladrido-Ignacio, L., & Perlas, A. P. (1996). From victims to survivors: Psychosocial intervention in disaster management in the philippines. International Journal of Mental Health, 24(4) (Taylor and Francis Ltd.).Google Scholar
  13. Paladin, K. C., et al. (2014). Meron o Wala: A study on the usefulness of twitter during Typhoons as perceived by students of selected intramuros-based schools (Vol. 4, No. 1). Working Paper Series on ICT for Development. Dhaka: Bangladesh Institute of ICT for Development and University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh.Google Scholar
  14. Pante, B. L., et al. (2013). Participatory action research in diaster preparedness and community reconstruction. Philippine Sociological Review, 61(2). Classical Sociological Theory in Contemporary Practice. Quezon City: Philippine Sociological Society.Google Scholar
  15. Partnership for Disaster Reduction South East Asia. (2008). Monitoring and reporting progress on community-based disaster risk management in the Philippines. Bangkok, Thailand: Asian Disaster Preparedness Center.Google Scholar
  16. United Nations Development Program. Disaster preparedness and Management Innovations in the Philippines. Accessed from Accessed date: March 13, 2017.
  17. Viloria, L. S. et al. (2013). Barangay Government disaster preparedness: The case of Typhoon Sendong affected Iligan communities. Philippine Sociology Society. Accessed from

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Liberal Arts BangladeshDhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations