Toward the Sufficiency Economy Perspective: The Mass Media and Cultivation of Social Capital Among the Rural Youth in Thailand

  • Boonlert Supadhiloke
Part of the Communication, Culture and Change in Asia book series (CCCA, volume 6)


In the wake of the global financial crisis in 1997, His Majesty the late King Bhumibol Adulyadej’s Sufficiency Economy Philosophy (SE) was widely publicized and integrated into the National Economic and Social Development Plans, leading to the shift of the national development paradigm from economic development (1961–1996) to people-centered development (1997-present). In view of the wide use of the mass media and the Internet to disseminate the best practices of the SE philosophy to inspire the Thai people, this study sought to examine whether the mass media and culture facilitate or hinder the development of social capital in young people in rural areas. Based on a sample survey of 15–24-year-olds (N = 400) in all six districts of the South Eastern province of Trat in 2014, the study provided empirical evidence in partial support of the hypotheses. Among the mass media, television use appeared to enhance both interpersonal trust and group networks among rural youth while radio listening contributed to group networks and newspaper reading enhanced interpersonal trust. Use of the Internet turned out to be a useful medium to cultivate both trust and group networks in young people. Similarly, rural youth’s engagement in cultural events led them to be more trusting of others and engage in group networks. More important, television, radio, and the Internet as well as cultural engagement appeared to be a “leveler” of social capital among the less privileged socioeconomic subgroups in rural Thailand. Thus, subjected to further empirical test, SE is a valid conceptual paradigm for an integrated multimedia campaign to achieve sustainable development goals.


Social capital Sufficiency economy philosophy Interpersonal trust Group networks Mass media use Cultural engagement 


  1. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Social space and symbolic power. In Sociological theory (Vol. 7, No. 1). Great Britain: Bocardo Press.Google Scholar
  2. Coleman, I. S. (1990). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), 95–120.Google Scholar
  3. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1980). The “mainstreaming” of America: violence profile no. 11. Journal of Communication, 30(3), 10–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Khamman, S. (2012). Towards a sufficiency economy: a new ethical paradigm for sustainability. Paris: Presented at UNESCO.Google Scholar
  5. Kim, S. H. (2007). Media use, social capital, and civic participation in South Korea. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(3), 477–494.Google Scholar
  6. Kline, F. G. (1971). Media time budgeting as a function of demographics and lifestyle. Journalism Quarterly, 48, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Krupanich, P. (2014). Mass media use, social capital and civic participation of Thai youth in Trat Province (in Thai) (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bangkok University, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
  8. Lyle, J. (1971). Television in daily life: patterns of use (overview). In E. A. Robinstein, G. A Comstock & J. P Murray (Eds.), Television and social behavior. (Vol. 4, pp. 1–32). Washington, D.C: National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
  9. Mahidol University. (2006). The use of social capital for the well-being of youth (in Thai). Nakorn Prathom: Institute Population and Social Research.Google Scholar
  10. McLeod, J. M. (2000). Media and the civic socialization of youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27, 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McLeod, J. M., & O’Keefe, G. J. (1972). The socialization perspective and communication behavior. In F. G. Kline & P. J. Tichenor (Eds.), Current perspectives in mass communication research. (pp. 121–168). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. McLeod, J. M., Rush, R. R., & Friederich, K. H. (1968). The mass media and political information in Quito, Equador. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32, 575–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McNelly, J. T., & Molina, J. R. (1972). Communication, stratification and international affairs information in a developing urban society. Journalism Quarterly, 316–326.Google Scholar
  14. Ministry of Social Development and Human Security. (2005). Formulation of social capital dimensions and indicators (in Thai). Bangkok: Office of the Under Secretary.Google Scholar
  15. Ministry of Social Development and Human Security. (2006). The use of social capital for the well-being of youth (in Thai). Bangkok: Office of Welfare Promotion and Protection of Children, Youth, Less Privileged, Handicapped and Elderly.Google Scholar
  16. Nakabutra, A. (2002). Social Capital and Civic Society in Thailand. Bangkok: Social Investment Fund National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB). 1999. Unofficial translation of the Thai working definition approved by His Majesty and sent by His Majesty’s Principal Private Secretary to the NESDB on November 29, 1999.Google Scholar
  17. National Economic and Social Advisory Council (NESAC). (2007). Formulation and evaluation of sufficiency economy indicators and the economic and social report on the national performance in the direction of sufficiency economy. Ubon Rajathanee University.Google Scholar
  18. National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB). (2012). Towards a sufficiency economy: a new ethical paradigm for sustainability. Paper presented at UNESCO, Paris by Mrs. Suwanee Khamman, Deputy Secretary-General of NESDB and Secretary-General of the Research and Development Institute of the Sufficiency Economy Philosophy Foundation (RSEPF).Google Scholar
  19. Pasek, J., Kenski, K., Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (2006). America’s youth and community engagement: how use of mass media is related to political knowledge and civic activity among 14–22 year olds. Communication Research, 33, 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pongsapich, A., & Yoddamnern Attic, B. (2000). Thailand social monitor: social capital and the crisis. The World Bank, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), Social Research Institute, Chulalongkorn University and Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University.Google Scholar
  21. Public Relations Department (PRD). (2014). NCPO’s Major Guidelines for National Development. Retrieved July 14, from
  22. Public Relations Department (PRD). (2015). Sufficiency Economy: A Fundamental Principle of Thai Values. Retrieved April 23, 2015 from
  23. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: civic tradition in modern Italy (Fifth printing). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Robinson, J. P. (1972). Mass communication and information diffusion. In F. G. Kline & P. J. Tichenor (Eds.), Current perspectives in mass communication research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Romer, D., Jamieson, K. H., & Pasek, J. (2009). Building social capital in young people: the role of mass media and life outlook. Political Communication, 26(1), 65–83. D01: 10.1080/10584600802622878.
  27. Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., & Yoon, S. H. (2001). Communication, context and community: an exploration of print, broadcast, and Internet influences. Communication Research, 28, 264–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Siamwala, A. (2001). Social capital and poverty (in Thai). Paper presented at Thailand Development Research Institute’s 2001 seminar on Strategy for Poverty’s Reduction at Pattaya, Cholburi.Google Scholar
  29. Wasi, P. (1999). Strengthening community: social capital of Thailand. Bangkok: Social Investment Fund and Government Savings Bank.Google Scholar
  30. Zhang, W., & Chia, S.C. (2006). The Effects of Mass Media Use and Social Capital on Civic and Political Participation. Communication Studies, September 2006. Retrieved June 1, 2015 from

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bangkok UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations