Advertisement

Conclusion: O Bailan Todos O No Baila Nadie

  • Liam Dee
Chapter

Abstract

The title of this chapter refers to a graphitised demand by Uruguayan dissidents: ‘Either Everyone Dances or No One Dances.’ It is this demand that frames the conclusion, by briefly examining what needs to be done to imagine and fight for a better post-art/culture future. While I acknowledge my negationary debt to dissident ‘creatives’ like Dada, Situationism and punk I also show the limits of their various projects of transcendence. Too often they rely on an emancipatory irrational essence that only needs to be tapped into and embraced for a revolutionary ecstasy to emerge. What this shows up is the lack of a conception of ludic creativity as socially mediated. Aesthetic passion does not just burst out like explosive magma, it has to be organised like every other social phenomena. This is important if we are to replace the banal metaphysics and recycled mysticism of art/culture for something better. While this conclusion does not provide specific answers it does contend that a world that is both more just and more fun doesn’t just need a better rationality to distribute the justice it needs a better irrationality to distribute the fun.

References

  1. Agamben, Giorgio. (2003) 2005. State of Exception. Trans. Kevin Attel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baudrillard, Jean. 2005. The Conspiracy of Art: Manifestos, Interviews, Essays, ed. Sylvère Lotringer. Trans. Ames Hodges. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  3. Clark, Timothy, Christopher Gray, Donald Nicholson-Smith, and Charles Radcliffe. 1967. The Revolution of Modern Art and the Modern Art of Revolution. Situationist International Online. http://www.cddc.vt.edu/sionline/si/modernart.html. Accessed 13 Nov 2012.
  4. Debord, Guy. (1967) 1983. Society of the Spectacle. Detroit: Black & Red.Google Scholar
  5. Downey, Anthony. 2014. Art and Politics Now. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd.Google Scholar
  6. Gamboni, Dario. 1997. The Destruction of Art: Iconoclasm and Vandalism Since the French Revolution. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  7. Home, Stewart. 1988. The Assault on Culture: Utopian Currents from Lettrisme to Class War. London: Aporia Press and Unpopular Books.Google Scholar
  8. Marx, Karl. (1939) 1973. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft). Trans. Martin Nicolaus. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  9. ———. (1975) 1992. Early Writings. Trans. Rodney Livingstone and Gregor Benton. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  10. O’Hara, Craig. 1999. The Philosophy of Punk: More Than Noise. San Francisco: AK Press.Google Scholar
  11. Partridge, Christopher. 2006. The Spiritual and the Revolutionary: Alternative Spirituality, British Free Festivals, and the Emergence of Rave Culture. Culture and Religion 7 (1): 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Taylor, Roger. 1978. Art, an Enemy of the People. Sussex: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  13. Trotsky, Leon. 1970. Leon Trotsky on Literature and Art, ed. Paul N. Siegel. New York: Pathfinder Press.Google Scholar
  14. Vaneigem, Raoul. (1983) 1993. The Revolution of Everyday Life. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liam Dee
    • 1
  1. 1.Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations