Comparing the Cases: What Do They Tell Us About Software Literacy?
This chapter reports the comparative analysis of the two case studies on media studies software (see Chap. 3) and engineering software (see Chap. 4). Common themes emerged across the cases such as students’ tendency to draw from informal learning strategies to supplement formal learning approaches, the diversity of student background and software abilities, and students’ general assumption that a tier 2 software proficiency level (see Chap. 1) would be adequate entry into a professional pathway. However, the cases differed in terms of the nature of the nuanced learning goals and aspirations of each discipline which impacted on the way course curricular, teaching, learning and assessment strategies were structured. These findings have implications for teaching and learning where software plays a central role in understanding and accomplishing disciplinary ideas and practices in tertiary and workplace contexts.
- Alexander, B., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., & Hall Giesinger, C. (2017). Digital literacy in higher education, Part II: An NMC horizon project strategic brief (Vol. 3.4, August 2017). Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
- Fuller, M. (2008). Software studies: A lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Goodfellow, R., & Lea, M. R. (2014). Literacy in the Digital University: Critical perspectives on learning, scholarship and technology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011). Code/space: Software and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Manovich, L. (2008). Software takes command (online draft). Retrieved from http://softwarestudies.com/softbook/manovich_softbook_11_20_2008.pdf.
- Peeters, J., Backer, F. D., Buffel, T., Kindekens, A., Struyven, K., Zhu, C., & Lombaerts, K. (2014). Adult learners’ informal learning experiences in formal education setting. Journal of Adult Development, 21(3), 181–192. doi: 10.1007/s10804-014-9190-1.
- Washington Accord. (2013). Graduate attributes and professional competencies. Retrieved from http://www.ieagreements.org.