Introduction: Software and Other Literacies
This chapter outlines the role and significance of software in contemporary society. Drawing from the new field of Software Studies, it sets outs key concepts relevant to the study of software, including affordances, agency, human-machine assemblages, and performance to explain the ways users co-create with software. It proposes the notion of software literacy as a framework to help readers unpack the ways the affordances of software can (re)shape the ways we think and act. These ideas are then grounded in an examination of an educational research project into the ways in which students become more literate about the nature and implications of software which they encounter as part of their tertiary studies.
- Ala-Mutka, K. (2011). Mapping digital competence: Towards a conceptual understanding. Seville: JRC-IPTS. Retrieved from http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=4699.
- Alexander, B., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., & Hall Giesinger, C. (2017). Digital literacy in higher education, Part II: An NMC horizon project strategic brief (Volume 3.4). Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from https://blog.stcloudstate.edu/ims/files/2017/08/2017-nmc-strategic-brief-digital-literacy-in-higher-education-II-ycykt3.pdf.
- Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2010). Digital literacy framework. Retrieved from http://jiscdesignstudio.pbworks.com/w/page/46740204/Digital%20literacy%20framework.
- Frabetti, F. (2014). Software theory: A cultural and philosophical study. London, UK: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Fuller, M. (2003). Behind the blip: Essays on the culture of software. New York, NY: Autonomedia.Google Scholar
- Galloway, A. R. (2004). Protocol: How control exists after decentralisation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Goodfellow, R., & Lea, M. R. (2014). Literacy in the Digital University: Critical perspectives on learning, scholarship and technology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hawk, B., Rieder, D. M., & Oviedo, O. (2008). Small tech: The culture of digital tools. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Heim, M. (1987). Electric language: A philosophical study of word processing (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Hight, C. (2015). Software studies and the new audiencehood of the digital ecology. In F. Zeller, C. Ponte, & B. O’Neill (Eds.), Revitalising audience research: Innovations in European audience research (Vol. 5, pp. 62–79). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- JISC. (2014). Developing digital literacies. Retrieved from https://www.jisc.ac.uk/full-guide/developing-digital-literacies.
- Johnson, S. (1997). Interface culture: How new technology transforms the way we create and communicate. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, G., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K.-L. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108–122.Google Scholar
- Khoo, E., & Cowie, B. (in press). Trial-and-error, Googling and talk: Engineering students taking initiative out of class. In D. Corrigan, C. Bunnting, A. Jones, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), Navigating the changing landscape of formal and informal science learning opportunities. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Khoo, E., Hight, C., Cowie, B., Torrens. R., & Ferrarelli, L. (2014). Software literacy and student learning in the tertiary environment: PowerPoint and beyond. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 18(1), 30–45.Google Scholar
- Khoo, E., Johnson, E. M., Torrens, R., & Fulton, J. (2011). It only took 2 clicks and he’d lost me: Dimensions of inclusion and exclusion in ICT supported tertiary engineering education. In Y. M. Al-Abdeli & E. Lindsay (Eds.), 22nd Annual Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (pp. 166–171). Fremantle, Australia: Engineers Australia.Google Scholar
- Lankshear, C., Knobel, M., & Peters, M. A. (2016). New literacies and digital epistemologies. Retrieved from https://www.peterlang.com/view/serial/NEWLIT?v=toc.
- Laurel, B. (1992). Computers as theatre. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.Google Scholar
- Livingstone, S. (2008). Engaging with media – a matter of literacy? Communication, culture & critique, 1(1), 51–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-9137.2007.00006.x
- Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Manovich, L. (2008). Software takes command (online draft). Retrieved from http://softwarestudies.com/softbook/manovich_softbook_11_20_2008.pdf.
- Manovich, L. (2011). Inside photoshop. Computational Culture: A Journal of Software Studies, Issue One, available from http://computationalculture.net/article/inside-photoshop.
- Manovich, L. (2012). How to follow software users. Available from http://manovich.net/content/04-projects/075-how-to-follow-software-users/72_article_2012.pdf.
- Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. In International texts in critical media aesthetics (Vol. 5). NY: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
- Martin, A. (2008). Digital literacy and the “Digital Society”. In Colin Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies & practices (pp. 151–176). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Martin, A., & Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development. Innovations in Teaching & Learning in Information & Computer Science, 5(4), 249–267.Google Scholar
- McGrenere, J., & Ho, W. (2000). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. In Proceedings of graphics interface 2000 (pp. 179–186), May 15–17, 2000, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
- Oblinger, D. (2003). Boomers, gen-Xers, and millennials: Understanding the “new students”. EDUCAUSE Review, 38(4), 36–45.Google Scholar
- Peeters, J., Backer, F. D., Buffel, T., Kindekens, A., Struyven, K., Zhu, C., & Lombaerts, K. (2014). Adult learners’ informal learning experiences in formal education setting. Journal of Adult Development, 21(3), 181–192. doi: 10.1007/s10804-014-9190-1.
- Selwyn, N., & Facer, K. (2007). Beyond the digital divide: Rethinking digital inclusion for the 21st century. Futurelab. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.101.3384&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
- Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Tsatsou, P. (2017). Literacy and training in digital research: Researchers’ views in five social science and humanities disciplines. New Media & Society. doi: 10.1177/1461444816688274.
- United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2013). Global media and information literacy (MIL) assessment framework: Country readiness and competencies. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002246/224655e.pdf.
- Valtonen, T., Dillon, P., Hacklin, S., & Väisänen, P. (2010). Net generation at social software: Challenging assumptions, clarifying relationships and raising implications for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 49(6), 210–219. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2011.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vee, A. (2017). Coding literacy: How computer programming is changing writing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar