Protection System Considerations in Networks with Distributed Generation

  • Gabriel Albieri Quiroga
  • Carlos Frederico Meschini Almeida
  • Henrique Kagan
  • Nelson Kagan
Chapter
Part of the Power Systems book series (POWSYS)

Abstract

This chapter presents methodologies to assess the impact of distribution generation on electric distribution network protection systems for an integrated network planning. The distributed generation (DG) alternative is seen as a shift in the paradigm of energy generation in the world. The adoption of renewable sources of energy for residential or commercial production brings not only environmental benefits, but also an opportunity to ease the supplying difficulties found in many countries. Despite solving some of the energy suppling problems, this paradigm change caused by the insertion of DG in electric distribution networks can bring some undesired technical impacts. The typical impacts assessed in the electric distribution networks planning involve the expansion of the network, such as losses, power factor, line loading, and voltage profiles, among others. However, a massive insertion of DG may also cause significant problems to the network protection, which involves the protection planning. In this way, it is necessary to identify potential protection issues and design means to model, diagnose and mitigate such issues. This chapter aims at describing the importance of predicting the potential impacts of high penetration of renewable sources on the protection system from electric distribution networks, in order to achieve an integrated network planning. Thus, in the beginning of this chapter it is discussed the main protection system issues that may arise from the high penetration of distributed generation, such as loss of protection coordination, overvoltage, loss of protection sensitivity, directional false tripping, unwanted fuse blowing, beside others. The chapter than demonstrates possible models utilized to assess those impacts, such as network modeling and renewable sources modeling, possible approaches such as the probabilistic and deterministic perspectives, regarding DG allocation algorithms and the possible methodologies for assessment such as scenarios or sensitivity analysis. The methodologies evaluate the protection impacts and are based on several short circuit calculations and for the probabilistic approach, the Monte Carlo Method. The results shown in the chapter may represent the calculation of such impacts for electric distribution networks. Those may contain loss of sensitivity, directional false tripping and unwanted fuse blowing impact calculations for some networks to illustrate the methodologies. To conclude the chapter, there will be more discussions regarding the results presented and the potential benefits of including this analysis on the integrated distribution network planning. In the end, the chapter illustrates the application of the presented methodologies with a case study using a real distribution network.

Keywords

Distributed generation Protection planning Integrated planning 

References

  1. 1.
    J.L. Del Monaco, in The role of distributed generation in the critical electric power infrastructure, Proceedings of the Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting IEEE, vol. 1 (2001), pp. 144–145Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C.J. Mozina, Update on the Current Status of DG Interconnection Protection-What IEEE 1547 Doesn’t Tell You About DG Interconnection Protection, Beckwith Electric Co., Inc., Ninth Annual Protection Seminar Sept. 24–28, 2006, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Nagpal, F. Plumptre, R. Fulton, T.G. Martinich, Dispersed generation interconnection—utility perspective. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 42(3), 864–872 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Barker, in Overvoltage considerations in applying distributed resources on power systems, Proceedings of Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, 2002 IEEE, vol. 1 (2002), pp. 109–114Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L.K. Kumpulainen, K.T. Kauhaniemi, Analysis of the impact of distributed generation on automatic reclosing, in Power Systems Conference and Exposition (2004), IEEE PESGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Chaitusaney, A. Yokoyama, Impact of protection coordination on sizes of several distributed generation sources, in Power Engineering Conference (2005), IPEC 2005Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.M. Brahma, A.A. Girgis, Development of Adaptive Protection Scheme for Distribution Systems with High Penetration of Distributed Generation. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 19(I.1) (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M.T. Doyle, in Reviewing the impacts of distributed generation on distribution system protection, Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting (2002), IEEEGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L.F. Ochoa, A. Padilha-Feltrin, G.P. Harrison, Evaluating distributed generation impacts with a multiobjective index. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 21(I.3) (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Girgis, S. Brahma, Effect of distributed generation on protective device coordination in distribution system, in LESCOPE Large Engineering Systems Conference on, 11–13 July 2001Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    IEEE Recommended Practice for Calculating Short Circuit Currents in Industrial and Commercial Power Systems, IEEE Standard 551-2006Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. Katiraei, et.al., Investigation of solar PV inverters current contributions during faults on distribution and transmission systems interruption capacity, in Western Protective Relay Conference, Oct 2012Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Turcotte, F. Katiraei, Fault contribution of grid-connected inverters, in IEEE Electrical Power Conference, October 22–23, 2009, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. Muljadi, M. Singh, R. Bravo, V. Gevorgian, Dynamic model validation of pv inverters under short circuit conditions, in Green Technologies Conference (2013), IEEEGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    N. Kagan, C.C.B. Oliveira, E.J. Robba, Introdução aos Sistemas de Distribuição de Energia Elétrica, ed. by Edgar Blucher, São Paulo (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G.A. Quiroga, H. Kagan, J.C.C. Amasifen, C.F.M. Almeida, E. Vicentini, Evaluation of distributed generation impacts on distribution networks under different penetration scenarios, in Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Latin America (ISGT LATAM) (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G.A. Quiroga, H. Kagan, J.C.C. Amasifen, C.F.M. Almeida, E. Vicentini, Study of the distributed generation impact on distributed networks, focused on quality of power, in International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP) (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriel Albieri Quiroga
    • 1
  • Carlos Frederico Meschini Almeida
    • 2
  • Henrique Kagan
    • 1
  • Nelson Kagan
    • 1
  1. 1.Electrical Energy and Automation Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Sao PauloSao PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Mining and Petroleum Engineering DepartmentUniversity of Sao PauloSao PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations