On the Causative Potency Theory in Tort Law

  • Xinbao Zhang


In China, there are neither specific stipulations in law nor academic treatises in the academic circle about causative potency theory, which has been referred to only by some particular administrative regulations and judicial interpretations.


  1. Cooke J (2003) Law of tort, 5th edn, The Law Press, p 146Google Scholar
  2. Fleming JG (1992) The law of torts, 8th edn, The Law Book Company Limited, pp 192–193Google Scholar
  3. Healy NJ (2001) The basis of apportionment of damages in both-to-blame collision cases, Loyola Law RevGoogle Scholar
  4. Huang SY (ed) (2004) The understanding and application of the judicial interpretation on compensation for personal injury, The People’s Court Press, pp 63–65Google Scholar
  5. Jones MA (2000) Torts, 7th edn, Blackstone Press Limited, p 564Google Scholar
  6. Li YY (ed) (1988) Civil law, Peking University Press, p 606Google Scholar
  7. Li RY (1996) Comparative law of torts, Peking University Press, p 119Google Scholar
  8. Li W (1997) On the compensation system for motor vehicle incidents in Japan, The Law Press, p 150Google Scholar
  9. Li YH (1999) American law of torts, The Law Press, p 214Google Scholar
  10. Liu SL (trans) (2003) The draft of European torts law. In: Zhang XB (ed) Torts law review, Issue 1, People’s Court Press, pp 204–205Google Scholar
  11. Markesinis, Deakin (1999) Tort law, 4th edn, Clarendon Press, pp 788–789Google Scholar
  12. Meadows JF, Markulis GJ (1989), Apportioning fault in collision cases, University of San Fransico Maritime Law JournalGoogle Scholar
  13. Peaslee RJ (1934) Multiple causation and damage, Harvard Law Rev 47:1137Google Scholar
  14. Shi S (2000) On the law of obligations, China University of Political Science and Law, p 303Google Scholar
  15. Wang ZJ (1998) Civil law theories and case study, vol 3, China University of Political Science and Law, p 313Google Scholar
  16. Wang Y (1999) On the causation theory in the law of torts. In: Liang HX (ed) Civil and commercial law review, vol 11, The Law Press, p 481Google Scholar
  17. Wang ZJ (2001) Law of torts, China University of Political Science and Law Press, pp 187, 189Google Scholar
  18. Wang LM (2003) On the doctrine of liability fixation of the law of torts, China University of Political Science and Law Press, p 395Google Scholar
  19. Wang LM (ed) (2004) The puzzling questions on the compensation for personal injury, China Social Sciences Press, pp 165, 208Google Scholar
  20. Wang LM, Yang LX (1996) Law of torts, The Law Press, p 38Google Scholar
  21. Xu AG (1999) Law of torts in the UK and the US, The Law Press, p 90Google Scholar
  22. Yang LX (1988) Compensation for torts, Jilin People’s Press, p 114Google Scholar
  23. Yang LX (2004) On the law of torts, The People’s Court Press, p 525Google Scholar
  24. Zhang XB (1998) Law of torts in China, China Social Sciences Press, pp 122–123Google Scholar
  25. Zhang XB, Li L (2001) A discussion on the theory of joint tort, People’s Court Daily, 9 Nov 2001Google Scholar
  26. Zeng SX (2001) The theory of compensation law, China University of Political Science and Law, p 259Google Scholar
  27. Zhu WG (1996) On the theory of contributory negligence. In: Liang HX (ed) Civil and commercial law review, vol 4, The Law Press, p 400Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Renmin University of China Law School, China Legal Science Journals PressBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations